User talk:Ironzombie39

March 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Anthem of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Anthem of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was changed by Ironzombie39 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9634 on 2024-03-06T01:20:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request

For the flag you did add more context, but rather than say "civil" make it "national flag" and since its the National flag i would suppose it should be on top rather than State flags which are only shown in Gov buildings and not international meetings, country, representations and such. CtasACT (talk) 02:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Lion of Judah Flag (the state flag) was used more than the Civil Flag and thus it was the National Flag. Ironzombie39 (talk) 14:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would disagree with your point since again i gave a thread in the talk page from Scholarly sources which have clearly distinguished the difference between the Lion of Judah as (state) and the "civil" flag as the National flag, this is according to Stanley Chojnacki, a Professor Emeritus, and Whitney Smith an expert on Vexillology. And in addition: Chapter VIII Article 124 of the 1955 Constitution has clearly said the "civil" flag is the flag of the Empire which is what National flags are. And to your point of it was used more than the civil flag, that is not what is presented according to These list of official images (Elizabeth II and Prince Phillp the Duke of Edinburg and Emperor Selassie visit, Queen Elizabeth II and Haile Selassie I, Haile Selassie state visit to Yugoslavia: Arrival ceremony for Haile Selassie I, Emperor of Ethiopia, 12:00PM | JFK Library, exc...) So the overwhelming evidence is that the plain, green, yellow, red flag was not only the National flag but the flag predominately used for official state visits of the head of state that being Emperor Haile Selassie. But i would appreciate it if you placed the Plain flag ontop. CtasACT (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring -Sasanian Empire

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to get into an Edit War though. if it seems that way, sorry. Just a little frustrated that the other user was using the wrong translation for "šahr" Ironzombie39 (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Your recent editing history at Syria shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 23:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war noticeboard

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

M.Bitton (talk) 00:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 07:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gothic Wikipedia

Hello, you reverted my edit on Ostrogothic Kingdom because, in your words, "The names also come from Gothic Wikipedia". However, I searched Gothic Wikipedia (in Latin and Gothic scripts) and could not find the article to verify that the names are properly sourced there. Could you provide a link to the article? As I'm sure you are aware, Wikipedia itself cannot be used as a source for Wikipedia (or anything, really), and the source we were using for the names on English Wikipedia is no better. Wiljahelmaz (talk) 15:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here ya go. Used these to help me.

http://got.wiki.x.io/wiki/𐌰𐌿𐍃𐍄𐍂𐌰𐌲𐌿𐍄𐌰𐌽𐍃

http://got.wiki.x.io/wiki/𐍅𐌹𐍃𐍄𐍂𐌰𐌲𐌿𐍄𐌹𐍃𐌺_𐍂𐌴𐌹𐌺𐌹

http://got.wiki.x.io/wiki/𐌹𐍄𐌰𐌻𐌾𐌰 Ironzombie39 (talk) 15:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ironzombie39! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salute of the Sublime State of Iran moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Salute of the Sublime State of Iran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and I could not find additional sources, and the source provided is not a reliable source. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pbritti (talk) 23:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small Request:

A Persian of this Wikipedia Article exists with lots of sources. However, I don't know how to successfully transfer them over since I can't read the Perso-Arabic Script and might mess something up. Can you do it please? Ironzombie39 (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salute of the Sublime State of Iran (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salute of the Sublime State of Iran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 18:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 07:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 14:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since previous decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suriyah Ya, Dat al-Majdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 05:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belarusian People's Republic

Please do not edit war over the move of the page. Please use {{rename}} in the page talk instead. --Altenmann >talk 22:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Salute of the Sublime State of Iran

Hello, Ironzombie39. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Salute of the Sublime State of Iran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PIA

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict, including discussing articles on talk pages, unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

December 2024

When you edited Relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world, you left an edit summary Hitler's opposition to Zionism is related to the relations between Nazi Germany and Arab world due to the Arab-Israeli conflict that happened afterward. Because you are not yet Extended confirmed, you cannot make any edits related to the "Arab-Israeli conflict". Accordingly, I reverted your edit. Cullen328 (talk) 04:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]