User talk:Hurricane Devon

This user, User:Hurricane Devon, is under copyright probation until January 20, 2007. While this user is under probation:

They are strictly prohibited from copyright infringement; any violation should result in immediate blocking.
This probation box is to remain in place.
Until August 20, 2007, this user is to refrain from starting new articles (other than redirects).
Until August 20, 2007, this user is to refrain from uploading any new images.

This probation is a voluntary agreement entered into in order to be unblocked. See [1] and [2] for the user's agreement to these terms. Please contact Mangojuice for any questions.

unblock|I'v leaned my lesson!

Knowledge seeker has been notifed of your request. Please do not re-add the unblock template. pschemp | talk 03:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are still unblocked, but have been caught in the auto block, which has nothing to do with your actions. Please do not remove my previous message, as it is important to anyone who might need to remove the autoblock. I have unblocked again. pschemp | talk 01:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

view • edit
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Hurricane_Devon.	Wikimedia Foundation

Milky Way

Hurricane Devon
Main | Talk | Journal | Lab

My quotes will be box like this. — Hurricane Dev o n @ 19:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC) [3][reply]

edit this list
Archives
Archive 1 ( 8/26/2005 – 9/9/2005 )
Archive 2 ( 9/10/2005 — 1/6/2006 )
Archive 3 ( 1/7/2006 — 4/30/2006 )
Archive 4 ( 5/1/2006 — 8/31/2006 )

Welcome to Hurricane Devon's complaint department
— Hurricane Dev o n @ 20:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article formatting

Dear Tropical cyclone editor,

As a member of the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject, you are receiving this message to describe how you can better tropical cyclone articles. There are hundreds of tropical cyclone articles, though many of them are poorly organized and lacking in information. Using the existing featured articles as a guide line, here is the basic format for the ideal tropical cyclone article.

Infobox- Whenever possible, the infobox should have a picture for the tropical cyclone. The picture can be any uploaded picture about the storm, though ideally it should be a satellite shot of the system. If that is not available, damage pictures, either during the storm or after the storm, are suitable. In the area that says Formed, indicate the date on which the storm first developed into a tropical depression. In the area that says Dissipated, indicate the date on which the storm lost its tropical characteristics. This includes when the storm became extratropical, or if it dissipated. If the storm dissipated and reformed, include the original start date and the final end date. Highest winds should be the local unit of measurement for speed (mph in non-metric countries, km/h in metric countries), with the other unit in parenthesis. The lowest pressure should be in mbars. Damages should, when available, be in the year of impact, then the present year. The unit of currency can be at your discretion, though typically it should be in USD. Fatalities indicate direct deaths first, then indirect deaths. Areas affected should only be major areas of impact. Specific islands or cities should only be mentioned if majority of the cyclone's effects occurred there.
Intro- The intro for every article should be, at a minimum, 2 paragraphs. For more impacting hurricanes, it should be 3. The first should describe the storm in general, including a link to the seasonal article, its number in the season, and other statistics. The second should include a brief storm history, while the third should be impact.
Storm history- The storm history should be a decent length, relatively proportional to the longevity of the storm. Generally speaking, the first paragraph should be the origins of the storm, leading to the system reaching tropical storm status. The second should be the storm reaching its peak. The third should be post-peak until landfall and dissipation. This section is very flexible, depending on meteorological conditions, but it should generally be around 3. Storm histories can be longer than three paragraphs, though they should be less than five. Anything more becomes excessive. Remember, all storm impacts, preparations, and records can go elsewhere. Additional pictures are useful here. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its peak, use a landfall picture in the storm history. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its landfall, use the peak. If the landfall is its peak, use a secondary peak, or even a random point in the storm's history.
Preparations- The preparations section can be any length, depending on the amount of preparations taken by people for the storm. Hurricane watches and warnings need to be mentioned here, as well as the number of people evacuated from the coast. Include numbers of shelters, and other info you can find on how people prepared for the storm.
Impact- For landfalling storms, the impact section should be the majority of the article. First, if the storm caused deaths in multiple areas, a death table would work well in the top level impact section. A paragraph of the general effects of the storm is also needed. After the intro paragraph, impact should be broken up by each major area. It depends on the information, but sections should be at least one paragraph, if not more. In the major impact areas, the first paragraph should be devoted to meteorological statistics, including rainfall totals, peak wind gusts on land, storm surge, wave heights, beach erosion, and tornadoes. The second should be actual damage. Possible additional paragraphs could be detailed information on crop damage or specifics. Death and damage tolls should be at the end. Pictures are needed, as well. Ideally, there would be at least one picture for each sub-section in the impact, though this sometimes can't happen. For storms that impact the United States or United States territories, this site can be used for rainfall data, including an image of rainfall totals.
Aftermath- The aftermath section should describe foreign aid, national aid, reconstruction, short-term and long-term environmental effects, and disease. Also, the storm's retirement information, whether it happened or not, should be mentioned here.
Records- This is optional, but can't hurt to be included.
Other- The ideal article should have inline sourcing, with the {{cite web}} formatting being preferable. Always double check your writing and make sure it makes sense.

Good luck with future writing, and if you have a question about the above, don't hesitate to ask.

Hurricanehink (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #1

Number 1, June 4, 2006

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary of the activities of the WikiProject over the past month and upcoming events over the next month. In addition monthly tropical cyclone activity will be summarized.

You have received this as you are a member of the WikiProject, please add your username in the appropriate section on the mailing list. If you do not add your name to that list, the WikiProject will assume you do not wish to receive future versions of The Hurricane Herald.

Storm of the month

Typhoon Chanchu was the first typhoon and first super typhoon of the 2006 Pacific typhoon season. Forming on May 9 over the open western Pacific Ocean, Chanchu moved over the Philippines on the 11th. There, it dropped heavy rainfall, causing mudslides, crop damage, and 41 deaths. It moved into the South China Sea, where it rapidly strengthened to a super typhoon on May 14, one of only two super typhoons recorded in the sea. It turned to the north, weakened, and struck the Fujian province of China as a minimal typhoon on the 17th. The typhoon flooded 192 houses, while heavy rainfall caused deadly mudslides. In China, Chanchu caused at least 25 deaths and $480 million in damage (2006 USD). Elsewhere on its path, strong waves from the typhoon sank eleven Vietnamese ships, killing at least 44 people. In Taiwan, heavy rainfall killed two people, while in Japan, severe waves killed one person and injured another.

Other tropical cyclone activity

Tropical Storm Aletta existed in the eastern Pacific Ocean from May 25 to May 29, peaking as a 45 mph tropical storm.

New and improved articles

New storm articles include: Typhoon Joan (1970), Hurricane Bonnie (1986), Tropical Storm Matthew (2004), Storm of October 1804, Typhoon Chanchu (2006) and Cyclone Olaf.

New non-storm articles include: Tropical cyclone rainfall climatology, Dvorak technique and List of Bangladesh tropical cyclones.

New Featured articles: 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, Hurricane Mitch, Hurricane Irene (2005) and Hurricane Claudette (2003)

Articles which became A/GA class: Hurricane Katrina (A), Effect of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans (A), Hurricane Felix (1995) (GA), Cyclone Percy (A), Labor Day Hurricane of 1935 (A), List of New Jersey hurricanes (A), Hurricane John (1994) (A), Tropical Storm Isabel (1985) (GA), Tropical Storm Odette (2003) (GA)

New articles and improvements wanted

An article is requested on subtropical ridge
The current collaboration of the fortnight is Hurricane Gilbert, please help improve this article.
Improvements are requested to Indianola Hurricane of 1886, Hurricane Camille and Hurricane Andrew.
The WikiProject is likely to submit Hurricane John (1994) and Hurricane Katrina to Featured Article Candidates in the near future, so please help improve them to featured standard.

Member of the month

This isn't the generic barnstar, we just don't have a WPTC star yet…

The May member of the month is TitoXD. The WikiProject awards this to him for his brilliant work in improving articles. TitoXD joined the WikiProject in October just after it had been founded. Since then he has contributed substantially to many articles, for example Hurricane Nora (1997), which is currently a Featured Article Candidate. He is also actively involved in the assessment of articles and so helps to improve many more articles.

Explanation of content

If you have a topic which is not directly related to any specific article but is relevant to the WikiProject bring it up on the Newsletters talk page, and it will probably be included in a future edition of The Hurricane Herald.

These two sections are decided by the community on the newsletter's talk page:

Storm of the month: This is determined by a straw poll on the page. While all storms will be mentioned on the newsletter, the selected storm will be described in more detail.
Member of the month: Nominations are made on the talk page, voting is by secret ballot; read the talk page for details. The winner receives the WikiProject's barnstar (when we make it).

Main Page content

2005 Atlantic hurricane season appeared on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on June 1.
Hurricane Floyd will appear on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on June 17.
Entries from Dvorak technique, Typhoon Joan (1970), Typhoon Chanchu (2006), and Storm of October 1804 appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know column during May.
Entries from 5 other articles relating to tropical cyclones had appeared in the Did you know column earlier in 2006.

Storm article statistics

Grade	April	May	June
FA	7	7	10
A	4	5	7
GA	0	3	5
B	62	66	82
Start	154	177	168
Stub	13	12	10
Total	240	263	282
percentage ≥Less than B	69.6	71.6	63.1

The assessment scale

The cyclone assessment scale is one of the bases of the new assessment scale for Version 1.0 of Wikipedia. It splits articles into several categories by quality, to identify which articles are "finished" and which ones still need to be improved.
The assessment scale by itself counts of several grades:
- FA: reserved for articles that have been identified as featured content only.
- A: this grade is given to articles that are considered ready for Wikipedia:peer review. The way to get this grade assigned to an article is by asking other cyclone editors at the WikiProject's assessment page.
- GA: reserved for articles that have passed a good article nomination.
- B: these articles are "halfway there", and have most of the details of a complete article, yet it still has significant gaps in its coverage.
- Start: articles that fall in this category have a decent amount of content, yet it is weak in many areas. Be bold and feel free to improve them!
- Stub: these articles are mostly placeholders, and may in some cases be useless for the reader. It needs a lot of work to be brought to A-Class level.
The way to use these assessments is by adding a parameter to the WikiProject template on the articles talk page ({{hurricane|class=B}} as an example). This feeds the article into a category which is read and parsed to create an assessment table, summary and log.

Welcome back

Glad to have you back, Devon. I've unblocked you for now; I hope you will be able to work with the other editors. If you have any questions about what's appropriate, please ask me. And please remember not to insultor or be mean to other editors—we're all here to make Wikipedia better. Consider this sort of a "probation" period. Be nice, OK? — Knowledge Seeker দ 03:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thansk, yet i'm still blocked! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 04:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cleared another autoblock. Try it now. — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nopw, still blocked! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 12:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still blocked here! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 01:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting annoyed here! Please unblock me. — Hurricane Dev o n @ 23:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unblocked now, thanks! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 19:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

redirects

When moving a page, like you did with Rho-2 Cancri, please check for double redirects like 58 Cancri and fix them--Kalsermar 01:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

I am quite disappointed that after I unblocked you, you promptly returned to copying material from other web sites. To take another's work in this manner is both unethical and illegal, and it places Wikipedia in a precarious legal position. Devon, I like you, but by copying material in this manner, you are just creating more work for other users to check over your edits and revert them if they find you copying material. Other people shouldn't have to watch over your edits, Devon. If you're unable to contribute to Wikipedia without plagiarizing other material or violating international copyright law, then I'm afraid you can't be a contributor here. This behavior is not acceptable, and I've reblocked you indefinitely. I'm sorry. — Knowledge Seeker দ 18:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know it was copyrighted! Thanks you so much. F.Y.I. blocking me dosn't make me learn my lesson, all dose is is makes me angry (especially at you). With users like you (not calmly taking my actions) are making me think of going perminent wikibreak. I don't want to leave wikipedia, but i'll have no choice. UNBLOCK ME NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 01:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trying to punish you or teach you a lesson; I am trying to keep copyrighted material out of Wikipedia. I previously tried discussing matters with you and you just demanded to be unblocked. I unblocked you and you went right back to the same behavior. I realize that perhaps you still do not understand copyright principles and I am willing to take time to explain it to you. I will not, however, unblock you until I am satisfied that you understand the principles involved and will not continue to copy material from other sources. Please do not add the {{unblock}} template again. Wikipedia policy (as well as federal law) does not permit copying material in this manner. If these terms are not acceptable to you, then I'm afraid you'll have to find another web site to which to contribute. I don't wish to be harsh but copyright violations are not acceptable, and this really is not negotiable. I can't unblock you if you copy material like this. — Knowledge Seeker দ 21:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I QUIT. I'd rather be in New Oreans through Hurricane Katrina then be a user on this website. Unblock me so I can delete my personal information (NOT YOU, ME!) I want to delete my data, Not you, not another user, Me! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 00:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that, Devon. I'd like to keep you as a contributor, though not if you're copying material from other web sites. I'd be happy to remove your personal information or even delete your user page if you like, but I can't unblock you. We can't allow copyright violators to edit. I'm sorry, Devon. — Knowledge Seeker দ 01:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to still be a user, but not a major one. Please unblock me, I sware on my dog's grave that I won't copyvio again. I've done some reading about said subject. I couldn't beleve the lawas I was breaking! I feel very ashamed, I deserve to be blocked. I promiss if you unblock me i'll never copy articals from copyrighted articals again and take pride in my editing. Please don't make me kiss your ass and call it ice cream! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 14:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pleased you are willing to learn about and respect copyright and are wish to remain contributing to Wikipedia. Let's take some time to discuss copyright and other matters and how these are applied on Wikipedia. I do want to make a couple matters clear first. Repeat copyright violators are normally blocked indefinitely. I'm willing to take the time to help you understand these matters, but don't expect to be unblocked in the next couple days. Last time I gave you the benefit of the doubt and unblocked you before making certain you understood all the issues, and it didn't take long for the old behavior to resume. I understand that you may not have realized what you were doing, so this time we're going to talk first to be absolutely certain you understand what's involved. I hope you will be more amenable to discussion than later time. Also, you should try to work on your anger a little bit. The outbursts of the last couple days really aren't appropriate. We all get angry from time to time; my advice is to stay away from Wikipedia when you're angry. When you cool off, you can return. Finally, flattering me is not necessary, nor will it be effective. I try to be reasonably rational; as you may have seen, insults aren't effective either. Let's stick to the topics at hand, OK? And let's take our time this time. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I feel like a monster. But quick question. What happened to my Archive box? Why was it deleted? — Hurricane Dev o n @ 14:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like an administrator thought you wanted it deleted, perhaps based on your earlier comments. I restored the archive. I want to explain two related concepts: plagiarism and copyright. I don't know how much you already know, so I'll start with basics, and I'll simplify it somewhat.

Plagiarism is presenting someone else's work as your own. It emphasizes more of the ethical violation. For instance, if you copy part of an encyclopedia article into your word processor and submit it as your school report, you're committing plagiarism. "Literary theft" is another term for this. A journalist was in the news some months back for copying parts of Wikipedia articles into his news articles, without crediting Wikipedia as the source. That is, he was presenting the article as wholly written by himself. This is unethical, and the journalism regards this as a violation of journalistic integrity, which is quite serious (I believe the reporter in question was fired). It's plagiarism even if you aren't selling the product; the act of pretending that someone else's work is your own is plagiarism. So be sure that for instance, when you're writing a school paper, you don't copy material from other sources. It won't be that hard for a Web-savvy teacher to discover that you didn't write the work yourself.

Copyright is a legal term; it refers to who has the right to copy, publish, and sell the work (either all or in part). It doesn't matter whether you admit you didn't create the work. For instance, the band U2 or their recording label owns the rights to the song "With or Without You". This means they can decide how the song can be copied or sold. It would be illegal for me to make a copy of the song or CD and give it to my friend, or for me to make the song available over the Internet. The former is not as serious, but in the second situation, making their copyrighted work available for many people is a serious copyright violation. It doesn't matter that I'm not pretending that I made the song myself. It's not my song to give away. By giving it away for free, I would distribute it to people who otherwise might have paid for it. In the extreme case, one person could buy the CD and just make copies for everyone else in the world who wanted it. Also, it doesn't matter if there is an explicit copyright notice on the work. Under U.S. copyright law, intellectual works are automatically copyrighted by the creator. So, for instance, the sentences I'm writing here are automatically copyright by me. Now the copyright holder may decide to release certain rights to his work. For instance, I might create an image and specify that anyone can use it for noncommercial purposes, that is, as long as they don't use it to sell something or for any sort of business purpose. This is how it's licensed. Most movies that you buy are licensed only for home use (watch the license information at the beginning). It would be illegal to sell tickets to people for them to come watch the movie. Another license is the GFDL. This is what we use on Wikipedia. While I retain the copyright to what I write, I release it under the GFDL, so that others may reuse it, provided they credit me with writing it. People don't have to grant any rights at all; this is called "all rights reserved".

So when you copy material from other web sites, you are often committing both plagiarism and copyright violations. On the one hand, you are taking someone else's work and pretending it's your own, which is unethical. And even if you credit them or list them as a reference, you're still using their creative work without their permission, which is a copyright violation; this is illegal (and unethical as well, in most people's opinions). Doing so damages the credibility of Wikipedia and opens it up to legal problems as well.

Do you understand this so far? And do you understand why the other users are so concerned? They're not doing saying those things to punish you or make you angry. They're doing it because they care about Wikipedia, the law, and being fair. — Knowledge Seeker দ 00:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OMFG. Now I feel like a criminal. I'm so sorry! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 16:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I's so sorry about my past behavior. I'd like to come back as an editor on this site. If you can forgive me though?
— Hurricane Dev o n @ 00:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry it's taken me a while to get back to you. I've been thinking about your situation over the past few days, and I've decided that I'm not comfortable removing your block. This is not a decision I've made lightly, and I'd like to explain.

I like you, and I've enjoyed your presence here. Enthusiastic editors are great to have around. But it's been a problem for you to follow policies here. It's one thing not to be familiar with Wikipedia policies, but once they're explained to you nicely, with links for more information, there really is no excuse for you to continue in the behavior. This has been a problem from when you first started here under your previous username, making inappropriate page moves that I had to sift through and undo. But the copyright violations are far worse, both because of their illegality but also because they are much harder to catch. I am quite busy at work these days and don't have time to mentor/supervise you. And it would be quite unfair and selfish of me to unblock you, forcing other editors to double-check all your contributions and revert the ones that are copyright violations. They have other tasks to do. It's especially disturbing because I already tried to get you to stop this behavior with my previous block; once I unblocked you you promptly resumed copying material from other web sites.

Everyone can make mistakes, but the really problematic behavior has been how you handle conflicts. Other users made good-faith efforts to explain to you why your actions were wrong or what to do differently. At best, you ignored them and continued the behavior, but in many cases, you got angry with them, harrassed them on their talk pages, or added them to a "users to kill" list. This is not the way to treat your fellow editors. And you shouldn't have to be repeatedly blocked to get you to discuss or change your behavior. And instead of discussion, you reacted with anger, stating you'd rather be a hurricaine victim than contribute here, and threatened suicide. This is not appropriate; it creates a lot of work for other editors and it is quite taxing.

I normally am quite generous with "second chances", but I am dismayed by the lack of effectiveness our previous discussions have had, that I've had to reblock you in order to converse with you. And as I mentioned earlier, I am just too busy right now to properly supervise you. If you wish, you may request unblocking via the {{unblock}} template or by communicating with administrators via e-mail (privately or over the mailing list) or on IRC. To any reviewing administrator: you may use your judgment in evaluating this block. If you feel comfortable unblocking and supervising Hurricane Devon, you may feel free to do so; consultation with me is not required. You are welcome to contact me for further information or rationale. Outside parties may wish to see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Hurricane Devon for context. — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like a monster for my past behavior. But I will promis you that if you unblock me again, i'll never use copyrihted stuff again. I'm very sorry about that, but... I don't know. I know I've been a bad person and friend, but I'll do better in the future. Please trust me. — Hurricane Dev o n @ 01:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone unblocks it should be done in the spirit of WP:AGF --Containment Unit 09:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unblock|I've learned my lesson, I'd like to get my dignaty back}}

I've learned my lesson know. I'd like to make my name good, not bad. Please unblock me KS. — Hurricane Dev o n @ 14:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to take the responsibility for unblocking you if you agree to the following three conditions. First, I think you should agree to be on probation for the next six months. During that time, you keep a box prominently displayed at the top of this page that explains you are on probation for copyright violations, and that explains you should be blocked for any copyright violations. Second, within the first week of your unblocking, you should go through all your old contributions that still exist and mark them with {{db-author}} so that they can be speedily deleted. A lot of them are still out there, and you can help clean up the mess. Third, for the next month, refrain from starting new articles or uploading images. If you agree to this, leave a note here agreeing to it, and I'll unblock you. Mango juice^talk 15:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But i'ved leared my lesson. I won't copyvio stuff again. The point of being unblocked is to clean my name, not tell everyone els i'm a bad person. I'm not going to delete the popular articals i've copyvioed in, i'll fix and get rid of it but not delete it. And I'm not going to stop editing for a month. I'm willing to be on probation but not be a prisoner from this website.

FYI. theres about 20 people in my building that are also members and they complain to me that they are also blocked because they have the same ID code. Think of them. — Hurricane Dev o n @ 17:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I wasn't very clear. What I want you to mark for deletion are the copyvio images you uploaded, and any articles that started out as copyright violations and only you have edited. As you can see from the messages below, there are still lots of images you've uploaded that are problematic. And I don't want you to stop editing for a month, rather, just don't upload any new images or create any new articles for a month. The reason for this request is that most copyright violations happen when people upload images or create new articles. There are plenty of articles out there in need of improvement. Mango juice^talk 06:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but a few things to tell you. One, all copyvio works i've uploaded have been deleted or being put up for deletion. Two, ok for the month thing. I've been through a lot. Please unblock me know. — Hurricane Dev o n @ 12:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fair enough. I'm going to add the box to the top of your talk page here describing your probation. I realize those images have been "put up for deletion" but it's a lot of work to verify copyright status, and they can be deleted more quickly if you agree to it, because of criteria for speedy deletion G7 which says "any page for which deletion is requested by the original author, provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author and was mistakenly created." Tell you what, to save you the effort, if you can tell me which ones you agree are copyright violations that should be deleted, I'll start deleting them. Mango juice^talk 13:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but i'm still blocked! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 15:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Weird. I'm going to block you for one minute; see if it works after that. If not, you may just have to wait for 24 hours. If you're still blocked, can you post what it says when you try to edit? Mango juice^talk 18:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still blocked. Pleade unblock me. — Hurricane Dev o n @ 01:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock removed. Try again. --pgk^(talk) 07:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, now I'm unblocked. I promis to be a good editer and follow the rules. — Hurricane Dev o n @ 12:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see it's working now. Returning to the mess cleanup; would it be okay if I delete all the images under the heading "Unfree images" below? What about the ones under "Public domain images"? Mango juice^talk 02:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #2

The July issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images

You uploaded the following images in Category:Hurricane Devon's uploads as "fair use", however you did not provide a fair use rationale. They are now listed on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 July 8.

Chaos syndrome 14:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfree images

You uploaded the following images in Category:Hurricane Devon's uploads as public domain, however the license at [4] says that permission is required for publication. They are now listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#8 July.

Chaos syndrome 14:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following images also violate licenses, though you claim they are public domain. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#8 July for more information.

Chaos syndrome 14:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain images

You uploaded the following images in Category:Hurricane Devon's uploads as public domain. However, checking the source reveals no indication of this. They are now listed on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#8 July.

Chaos syndrome 14:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Image information

Template:Image information has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. howch e ng {chat} 20:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hurricane Devon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for something I wasn't told was wrong, and on another website!

Decline reason:

There are extensive discussions on your talk page documenting the efforts of multiple users, including me, to explain the nature of and problems with copyright violations. It's also documented on the image upload pages as well. — Knowledge Seeker দ 09:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are again indefinitely blocked for violating your probation. On July 23, 2006, you uploaded Image:VCG.jpg. You claim the copyright holder allows this to be used for "any purpose" but I couldn't confirm this on the website. Regardless, you agreed not to upload new files for a month, so you're blocked again. I will not unblock you; if another administrator wishes to, they'll have to take responsibility for your constant copyright violations. Mango juice^talk 19:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded that image on wikicommons, not wikipedia!!! You blocked me for doing something on a different website? That's against my wikipedia probation? If so, I'm sorry but you didn't tell me this was for every wiki-site. I only thought it was for wikipedia. I'm sorry, please unblock me. You can't unblock me for something you didn't tell me or for doing something thats part of my Wikipedia probation on wikicommons! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 23:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'M SORRY:( I DON"T WANT TO BE PERMENTLY BLOCKED! I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT I DID WAS WRONG. PLEASE DON'T PERMENTLY BLOCK ME!!! — Hurricane Dev o n @ 23:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The point of your probation is to keep your from violating copyrights. You did it again. Uploading a copyrighted image to commons is even worse than uploading it here, because it then becomes that much more difficult to clean up the mess, and because the tainted file can then affect other wikipedias, not just English. Besides, it's clear you were gaming your probation, uploading the file through commons so it wouldn't show up here. I no longer believe you actually care about our copyright concern, you were just saying that before to get unblocked. I don't know why you like violating copyright so much, but as far as I'm concerned, I'm not unblocking. Mango juice^talk 02:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying, Mangojuice. Devon, you violated copyright again despite Mangojuice's warnings and my explanations. If you didn't know it was wrong, despite Wikipedia's and Commons' policies, and despite our explanations, then you really can't be editing here. Even without the upload prohibition, this copyright violation, after all we've been through, is enough for me to say that you shouldn't be editing here anymore. Especially since in the short time you were unblocked, you made several other questionable edits, including editing an article to report that you had suggested a name for a galaxy. You may not realize why that's inappropriate, but it's really too much for other users to have to clean up after all this. Given the failure of two trial probations (actually three, I suppose), I must ask that any administrator considering unblocking you discuss the matter with me (and probably with Mangojuice) first, and to read these discussions and the RFC. I've enjoyed talking with you, Devon, but I don't think contributing to an encyclopedia's the best activity for you. — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:M108.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:M108.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Angr 09:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template edits

Please make sure your edits to templates do not break large numbers of articles. Your recent edits to Template:Galaxy left ugly wikicode on display in every article using the template. I've reverted it back to how it was before your edits. Chaos syndrome 16:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Maffei.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Maffei.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shizhao 02:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:BetaLyrae.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BetaLyrae.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 10:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:IotaHorologii-b.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:IotaHorologii-b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 19:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cet-s.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cet-s.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 22:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rocko

I found this http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:_NvpjptJFmEJ:www.thethingsiwant.com/gifting/cview.php4%3FITID%3D482077+%22Rocko+James+Wallabee%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5 - It's a clothing site that also mentions Rocko's full name. WhisperToMe 15:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Aldrovanda1.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aldrovanda1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 17:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:NGC 6822.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:NGC 6822.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 18:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Mira illustration.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mira illustration.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nilfanion (talk) 20:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation article Gliese 581 b

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, Gliese 581 b, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! Chaos syndrome 10:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #3

The August issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LMC.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LMC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree images

The following images that you uploaded or altered have been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the images' copyright status cannot be verified, they may be deleted. Please go to the image pages to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of these images (if you have any), if you are interested in them not being deleted.

Thank you. Chaos syndrome 20:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:M98.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:M98.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 20:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:M58.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:M58.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chaos syndrome 20:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The usual drill... again...

Image:Leoi.gif, Image:UMa-north.gif, WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 20:44, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NewHorizons@Jupiter.jpg, Image:Dwingeloo 1.jpg, Image:Dawn dm.jpg, WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 20:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DeltaTri.jpg, WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 20:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)][reply]

Some more, now on WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 21:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...and another one Image:GalaxyM60.jpg. See WP:PUI. Chaos syndrome 21:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, let's try again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hurricane Devon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to make a good name for myself

Decline reason:

Sorry to say, but this isn't your second chance. It's not even your third chance. Your best move at this point might be to just return under a different name and make a good name, there, if you can avoid the same disruptive behaviors. -- Luna Santin 21:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Hurricane Devon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

71.98.198.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

copyright violation

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Hello. I'm a user that has made a bad name of not just wikipedia, but himself. I would like to make a good name for myself. And to do this appologize to everyone i've done wrong to. Knoledge seeker and Mangojuicetalk, You've looked to me with good intentions but I crushed them with lies. Chaos syndrom, you care about me and I a did was almost made you quit yourself.

My "vacation" has givin' me a positive attitude. I'm not going to force anything to anyone, but if you can find it in your heart to forgive me and give me a second chance. — Hurricane Dev o n @ 12:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed your unblock-auto request, since you aren't autoblocked. Anyone wanting to unblock this guy please talk to me first: despite his good intentions, I myself am not willing to take a chance on trusting him again. Mango juice^talk 18:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NewHorizons@Jupiter.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NewHorizons@Jupiter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Conscious 08:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Antennen-galaxies2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Antennen-galaxies2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 18:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:SCR1845-6357--22.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:SCR1845-6357--22.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Image information

Template:Image information has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Extrasolar Planet small

A tag has been placed on Template:Extrasolar Planet small requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Andromeda Footer

A tag has been placed on Template:Andromeda Footer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Devon of NuclearVacuum?

I think this user has abandoned this user ID,
and is now using the user ID User:NuclearVacuum.
Either that or he has become a sockpuppet master.
GabrielVelasquez (talk) 21:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new task force - ESA

Hello,

I've noticed that you are active in the area of space exploration. I just wanted to let you know that a European Space Agency task force has been set up to improve the presently very poor condition of articles about ESA and related topics. If you are interested, please join the task force here. We sure could use your help. Thanks.U5K0 (talk) 11:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dionemap.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dionemap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:26, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Np

Template:Np has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 04:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Devon for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ~Nerdy Science Dude 13:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Travel Management Company

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Travel Management Company, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.linkedin.com/companies/travel-management-co..

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Travel Management Company

A tag has been placed on Travel Management Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~Nerdy Science Dude 13:12, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Website-short

Template:Website-short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Leaderdog2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Leaderdog2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Website listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Website. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Website redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Magioladitis (talk) 22:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ssc2006-05b.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ssc2006-05b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tort1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tort1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 00:52, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Hurricane Devon! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NGC 4038 Group

The article NGC 4038 Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. No significant coverage in studies, not in a catalogue of note (not actually in the NGC catalogue, just named after it), nothing visible to the naked eye, and no sources before 1850 were found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 20:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SN 2006F

The article SN 2006F has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:NASTRO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Geminga.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Geminga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plutonian-system-size.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Plutonian-system-size.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. House Blaster^talk 13:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]