User talk:Mccapra
It is approximately 8:25 PM where this user lives (BST). [ ] |
|
||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Help on Johnny Partin
[edit]hello i was wondering if the edit i just made on the page im creating Johnny Partin is better for the copyright issue i had because i reworded everything that is now in the artical and i wanted to know if its better
Paytonisboss (talk) 19:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Paytonisboss: hi if you scroll down on this link you can see which pieces of text you still need to reword in order to remove that issue. Keeping quotes as they are is fine though. My issue when I reviewed the page wasn’t copyright however, it was whether the subject is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Mccapra (talk) 21:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Mccapra Thank you for explaining however its been a hot topic around where i live specifically in the Tri-Cities, Virginia area so thats why im making it many people at my workplace who arent wikipedia editors were asking me if i could make a page about it however i still view this as its not relivent to the majoraty of viewers so i get why you did what you did Paytonisboss (talk) 22:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Notability of Kurdistan Islamic Relations Movement
[edit]I don't really get what the problem is. Sure, it's not a big party, but neither are, for example Mieterpartei, Socialist Equality Party (Germany) or WiR2020. The page cites an article by Rûdaw, the largest news network in Iraqi Kurdistan, which has published numerous articles specifically about the party (proof). Most examples in Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) are talking about companies, there aren't really specifications for what makes a party notable. But there clearly is significant coverage, the coverage is independent, there are multiple sources (even if not that many since it's a stub). So yeah, explain to me how I can convince you of the notability. - Ermanarich (talk) 11:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- hi thanks for your message. Generally, if a party is contesting elections, the benchmark for notability is whether it has succeeded in getting anyone elected. This party won <1% of the vote so is nowhere near that. Recycled press releases saying it was founded, held a congress or elevated a leader don’t make it notable. It is possible that much wider and more extensive press coverage could make it notable, but I don’t see that at the moment. All the best Mccapra (talk) 11:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- As I said, there are numerous articles on Wikipedia of parties that haven't got anyone elected. Furthermore, the project page on notability doesn't mention getting a candidate elected is a benchmark for notability.--Ermanarich (talk) 22:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Lezgistan is a state of one people (Lezgins). Lekia (also known as the Lakz, and this is a more correct name) is a state of 10 different peoples (Aghuls, Rutuls, Tsakhurs, Budukhs, Khinalughs, Tabasarans, etc.). Why did you delete my edit and redirect (Lekia -> Lezgistan)?
The state of Lekia (Lakz) was mainly located on the territories of modern Russia and Azerbaijan. Lezgistan (the conventional name of the Lezgin state) was located on the territory of modern Russia. In the Russian and Azerbaijani Wikipedias, there are two separate articles for these terms: ru-wikipedia: (ru-1) Лакз(=Лекия)/Lakz(=Lekia) and (ru-2) Лезгистан/Lezgistan; az-wikipedia: (az-1) Leq_çarlığı (Lakz) and (az-2) Ləzgistan)
- hi thanks for your message. I redirected the article not because I thought the two subject were the same, but because the Lekia article wasn’t properly sourced. It needs inline citations throughout, relating the sources you’ve provided to the individual statements in the article. I’m afraid it is not ready for encyclopedia mainspace without that. If you wish I can move it to draftspace so you can add inline citations and when that’s done I can re-publish it. Mccapra (talk) 07:53, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! OK, please move it to draftspace. DigitalSpace (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done and there’s now a link to it from your talk page. Mccapra (talk) 08:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You! DigitalSpace (talk) 08:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done and there’s now a link to it from your talk page. Mccapra (talk) 08:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
"Shattered Island (Skylanders)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Shattered Island (Skylanders) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1 § Shattered Island (Skylanders) until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC678 07:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
[edit]Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks I responded a while ago. Mccapra (talk) 03:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Prod
[edit]The article Pilgrimage centres in Ernakulam district has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Only 1 item in this list is notable. Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No decent target for redirection.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Bearian: thanks but not one of mine. I just deorphaned it in 2018. Mccapra (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
[edit]January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Italo-Prussian Alliance
[edit]Hi! Not sure if it was OK to decline your speedy-deletion request there, but reasons given in my edit summary. Do please let me know if you want me to reverse that call (but sort of hoping you won't). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Justlettersandnumbers: thanks for your message. I assumed that since the other article got into mainspace first it would have priority, but I agree mine is better written! I see you’ve redirected the other article and hopefully that will stick. Anyway it’s a lesson to me not to keep faffing around in user space for months on end when I’m translating. All the best Mccapra (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, good! The first-in-mainspace thing carries little weight for me – those OKA editors are paid, and should be creating new pages only in draft space, not sure why they think they don't need to. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)