User talk:Hotwiki/Archive 13
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Hotwiki. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
Removal of information on Dance covers, linking of choreography to composition in the genre, multiple promotional videos
Respectfully, I do not agree at all with your removal of an entire section of relevant, carefully thought-through, and significant material, which is supported by numerous quality references. I work in the industry, albeit on another continent, and have observed a significant shift in music consumer tastes, and positive reception of new types of music products, with specific changes to the music industry generally; Korean music makers have made significant changes to marquis products, such as the MTV type music videos (in the industry we used to call these "promotional videos"), and create derivative products with broad appeal, particularly international appeal. This particular group, Momoland, while not having the stature of a BTS or a Black Pink, nonetheless has been one of the trendsetters for the industry generally. The group was formed in 2016 at a time when cost of production of music videos had dropped exponentially compared with cost years earlier, and the cost of distribution had dropped to zero (through YouTube), while the user base of TikTok and Instagram Reels was exploding. Uniquely, this group not only had three fluent anglophones, they are the first group feature not only an American, but an Irish American with an Irish name, as well as another who was fluent in Mandarin, as well as English and several other languages. They not only made popular dance covers, but were themselves copied in dance covers from at least twenty countries. This group is an excellent example of how Korean music creators have evolved, and I would argue transformed the music industry as we know it. This past week Universal Music announced made its earnings announcement, and of the five acts they mentioned, three were Korean, one was Japanese, and only one American. This is relevant to both fans and the music industry itself. You left in the article dates an album came out, or that a group donated a certain amount of rice to a charity as relevant, yet part of the global transformation of the industry is not only relevant, it is even more relevant than the majority of the text in the current article. I plan to revert your edit, but did not want to do so without having a civil discussion. Wiki is more than just a bunch of lists. Respectfully, Kops2222
Adding OTT info on select pages
Hi! We would like to add additional info on First Yaya and Agimat ng Agila as they are also available on iQiyi (iQ.com or iQiyi app). Hope you can allow us to add these in the pages. Thank you!
First Yaya - https://www.iq.com/play/zsao6kiyjt?frmrp=home&frmb=focus_banner_1&frmrs=click Agimat ng Agila - https://www.iq.com/play/25v64uz4f35?frmrp=home&frmb=R:37824992012&frmrs=2
GMA iQiyi announcement - https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/showbiz/chikaminute/785645/gma-shows-are-coming-to-iqiyi-here-s-everything-you-need-to-know/story/ https://www.clickthecity.com/tv/article/93563/gma-network-partners-with-iqiyi-to-bring-more-filipino-programs-online/
AhMjuwX (talk) 04:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sounds like a promotional tactic. Wikipedia isn't the place to promote streaming sites.TheHotwiki (talk) 08:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Pepito Manaloto
Why do you restored my edits? MaccWiki (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't restore your edits. You just repeated information that was already posted in the article so I removed it.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
My edits is not a false information, so please dont remove it. MaccWiki (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- You also added unreferenced cast members and please use the edit summary.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Cherry malvar is one of the cast of pepito manaloto, but why you remove it. MaccWiki (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Again post a reference. Simple.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
But why, i don't have to prove it, because i watch her every saturday. MaccWiki (talk) 14:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Alot of cast & characters in this article, has no reference. MaccWiki (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- There are rules in Wikipedia. If you are questioned for adding unreferenced edits, you must back them up with an actual reference. Or else you could be reported for not posting references. TheHotwiki (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- And just because the section lacks references, that doesn't excuse you for not posting references.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- There are rules in Wikipedia. If you are questioned for adding unreferenced edits, you must back them up with an actual reference. Or else you could be reported for not posting references. TheHotwiki (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Please don't remove my edits, because we both inform people, don't be selfish MaccWiki (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Learn to post references. Now please can you move forward to other things instead of calling editors "selfish" for following the rules. TheHotwiki (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JustifyMyLoveSample.ogg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Hotwiki. Thank you.AngryHarpytalk 12:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GMA Regional TV Weekend News title card.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Jollitown
I have simply added the genre, which is variety show, on the Jollitown Kids Show. It is not your mere average "informative" show. Are you even a Filipino? I've said that on the edit summary.
- You failed to add a reference.TheHotwiki (talk) 12:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Partners Mel and Jay title card.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Pepito Manaloto July 16, 2021
I fixed that section and then you messed it up again, you should give other editors the privilege to edit that page. You always change it even if the source I entered is correct. That section got even more messy because of what you did. Please fix it. MaccWiki (talk) 13:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't mess anything. You are the one adding poorly sourced references, like IMDb and Bing. You are also not following Mdy format. Anyway, I added more references to further fix the article. TheHotwiki (talk) 13:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
I just divided it into 2 parts, the original and the prequel cast, but you remove it. I just want to arrange them properly so people don't confuse, but you remove it. Then you merge the old cast and present cast which is not right. Are you even a filipino or not? MaccWiki (talk) 13:12, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
The past revisions is much more informative, but it change a lot. MaccWiki (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Take it to the talk page of the article and wait for a consensus. Wikipedia is a collaborative site.TheHotwiki (talk) 13:15, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of GMA Network News for deletion
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GMA Network News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GMA Network News title card.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Source
Hi I'm here again, MaccWiki. I can speak and read a little bit of english, but it's so difficult to understand some paragraphs. Can you explain to me what is the acceptable sources to put on an article, can you give me an example?. And what kind of sources that shouldn't put in the article?. I will wait for your reply, thank you. MaccWiki (talk) 10:08, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Read Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Don't use fan sites and message boards.TheHotwiki (talk) 10:29, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Sandbox
Hi again!. It is ok that added (My Sandbox) on my own userpage. Just asking. MaccWiki (talk) 11:33, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- Your sandbox is your sandpage.TheHotwiki (talk) 11:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
So it's ok? MaccWiki (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- it's ok.TheHotwiki (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Cast of Pepito Manaloto
Why you removed those cast i added. MaccWiki (talk) 00:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- The references you added didn't mention those actors are regular or recurring cast members.TheHotwiki (talk) 01:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- The others cast of the show has also have a ref but didn't mention those actors and actresses are regular or recurring cast members. And you didn't remove them. MaccWiki (talk) 02:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Which references are you talking about? TheHotwiki (talk) 09:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- The others cast of the show has also have a ref but didn't mention those actors and actresses are regular or recurring cast members. And you didn't remove them. MaccWiki (talk) 02:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Joshua Dionisio is not a cast member of the show according to the source you added. MaccWiki (talk) 06:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Then delete it then.TheHotwiki (talk) 11:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey
User:Geraldo Perez has been here for a long time. Please don't put warning templates on their page--they deserve an actual note. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- And so am I. It was a level 1 warning template anyway and it wasn't added in his talk page for no reason.TheHotwiki (talk) 02:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Feels?
Why is that T of "the" not counted as the first letter? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- @HueMan1: You could have googled it as it is common knowledge. Anyway, try reading Alphabetical order#The_and other common words.TheHotwiki (talk) 18:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JumpForMyLoveSample.ogg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1 for 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Santos.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:"Mama" by the Spice Girls (sample).ogg
A tag has been placed on File:"Mama" by the Spice Girls (sample).ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
- state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
- add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Binksternet (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
HELP! (Long-term abuse: User:Russel641)
A high-threat vandal user named Russel641 has been disruptively damaging all the Wiki articles related to Philippine television (including all the drama series and TV programs aired on ABS-CBN, GMA, and TV5), as well as editing IBC shows too. The user Russel641 is stealth active since late April 2021. Russel is refactoring (editing) talk page comments and warning contents, as well as ignoring all the warning messages from several admins and other users. Currently, I also see that all the articles of ABS-CBN dramas have been edited by Russel641 by adding the "and was replaced by (*name of program*)" signs.
I can't instantly revert all of over 150+ edit contributions of Russel641, so I hope that someone would report that user with perfection and extreme caution. -136.158.42.180 (talk) 08:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Report it to the administrators.TheHotwiki (talk) 09:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
The file File:AllSaintsLadyMarmaladeSample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sample of All Saints' remake/recording insufficiently supported by critical commentary. Merely used to identify the recording. May fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
File:PromiscuousSample.ogg listed for discussion
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of current GMA Network contract artists for deletion
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current GMA Network contract artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
I need your help can you review the article I created for Joaquin Domagoso.
Good day, I would have asked for help because someone proposed a deletion in the article I created, he said no because he is the mayor's son, this is not a basis to say that he is an actor and he doesn't have any significant roles on television. I also have a list of shows and series that he voted for me not to be deleted and someone also helped, I hope you can help me thank you. --7starunited (talk) 13:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
November 2021
Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Artikulo 247 have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. scope_creepTalk 21:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- What is this warning about? I created an article for a TV series that is set to premiere in 2 months (January 2022). Articles for upcoming TV series are common in Wikipedia. The references I added also came from different sources, not just the website of the TV network that will broadcast the TV series.TheHotwiki (talk) 21:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the sources are announcements of casting and don't constitute any analysis of how notable the program is. There is no analysis offered whether even to consider watching it. You have made it the case that by its mere existance makes it worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia, making it no more an inclusion in a directory. The only saving grace of the article is the series will air in 8 weeks. Stating that uncoming articles are common is really not ok. In the last two days, I saw an article that was airing until late 2023. What an absurd situation. Why not wait until the series is out, find out if it any good and then post the article? scope_creepTalk 12:35, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- If a series isn't out til late 2023, I wouldn't make an article to begin with. While I made sure, when creating the article for Artikulo 247, that there would be references including from third party sources to back up the article. The series is written in a neutral state, and all information in the article are backed up with a reliable source. The series already has begun filming which is also mentioned in the article. TheHotwiki (talk) 12:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- They're fan site sources, there is genuine references in there but a lot of seem to be clickbait sites, image and fan sites. Can I ask you something. I notice that a lot of these series articles with the same format are all made by GMA. Are you being paid to create these crystal ball articles, or do you work there, or know somebody that works there? The reason I ask is the terrible junk article you created, re above and is now at Afd. Also the images your posting, for example at To Have & to Hold (Philippine TV series), in the immediate top, below the lede, doesn't seem to follow the guidance offered by the manual of style, on this. Why is that? Of the 10'000's of tv and film articles that I have reviewed, none of them have that format of image, so prominently displayed. Why is that? scope_creepTalk 14:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- First of all, what are these fansite sources? SunStar and The Manila Times are newspapers in the Philippines. Philippine Entertainment Portal is a website owned by Summit Media. GMA Network has its own news agency. I've been using them in Wikipedia for years and no one told me those are fansites. I also don't appreciate being accused of "being paid". I have no connections to GMA Network. I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006. The article nominated for AFD (List of current GMA Network contract artists), wasn't created by me. I edited it recently (October 2021) and added references as it was outdated and lacked references. The last time I edited that article, before I revamped it was way back in 2018. You can check the page history of that article. While the photos of the actors added in TV articles, are added for identification. Other articles such as American Idol and The Real Housewives of Orange County have done this.TheHotwiki (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- That is coolio, thanks for that. But currently you look as though your trying to promote these people on Wikipedia. The Philippine Entertainment Portal is a clickbait site, the SunStar and The Manila Times, I've no doubt are extremly excellent papers, they are, but they take part in clickbait in the entertainment and culture section's as much as any other newspaper. You shouldn't be the GMA news agency, if your writing about their series, except to prove it exists. I never accused of anything, I simply asked in the simplest way possible. I understand the need for colour and images to provide depth and zhuzh it up a bit, but when your article's follow a format that makes themselves looks like clickbait, it is natural to become a wee bit suspicious, particularly since they all look the same. That would raise suspicion in anybody. You also put a huge number of edit's into List of current GMA Network contract artists. That article was a straight up subversion of the Wikipedia of Terms of Use. The article at American Idol follows the guidelines at WP:MOS exactly. There is no comparison here. Those judges in the American Idol are not displayed in the same manner that your doing so prominently, immediately under the lede. It is unacceptable and can't go on. Please follow the guidelines, like everybody else. I plan to check your work for a while. scope_creepTalk 15:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promote who? I rarely edit the Wikipedia articles for Filipino artists and personalities related to GMA Network. You can look up at the Wikipedia pages of the artists appearing in Artikulo 247, and you won't see an edit from me. I edit the Wikipedia article for shows appearing in GMA Network. But I don't edit every Wikipedia page related to GMA Network, as I'm selective to what I edit. I also have other interests, which are easy to spot in my user page/contribution page.TheHotwiki (talk) 19:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- That is coolio, thanks for that. But currently you look as though your trying to promote these people on Wikipedia. The Philippine Entertainment Portal is a clickbait site, the SunStar and The Manila Times, I've no doubt are extremly excellent papers, they are, but they take part in clickbait in the entertainment and culture section's as much as any other newspaper. You shouldn't be the GMA news agency, if your writing about their series, except to prove it exists. I never accused of anything, I simply asked in the simplest way possible. I understand the need for colour and images to provide depth and zhuzh it up a bit, but when your article's follow a format that makes themselves looks like clickbait, it is natural to become a wee bit suspicious, particularly since they all look the same. That would raise suspicion in anybody. You also put a huge number of edit's into List of current GMA Network contract artists. That article was a straight up subversion of the Wikipedia of Terms of Use. The article at American Idol follows the guidelines at WP:MOS exactly. There is no comparison here. Those judges in the American Idol are not displayed in the same manner that your doing so prominently, immediately under the lede. It is unacceptable and can't go on. Please follow the guidelines, like everybody else. I plan to check your work for a while. scope_creepTalk 15:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- First of all, what are these fansite sources? SunStar and The Manila Times are newspapers in the Philippines. Philippine Entertainment Portal is a website owned by Summit Media. GMA Network has its own news agency. I've been using them in Wikipedia for years and no one told me those are fansites. I also don't appreciate being accused of "being paid". I have no connections to GMA Network. I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006. The article nominated for AFD (List of current GMA Network contract artists), wasn't created by me. I edited it recently (October 2021) and added references as it was outdated and lacked references. The last time I edited that article, before I revamped it was way back in 2018. You can check the page history of that article. While the photos of the actors added in TV articles, are added for identification. Other articles such as American Idol and The Real Housewives of Orange County have done this.TheHotwiki (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- They're fan site sources, there is genuine references in there but a lot of seem to be clickbait sites, image and fan sites. Can I ask you something. I notice that a lot of these series articles with the same format are all made by GMA. Are you being paid to create these crystal ball articles, or do you work there, or know somebody that works there? The reason I ask is the terrible junk article you created, re above and is now at Afd. Also the images your posting, for example at To Have & to Hold (Philippine TV series), in the immediate top, below the lede, doesn't seem to follow the guidance offered by the manual of style, on this. Why is that? Of the 10'000's of tv and film articles that I have reviewed, none of them have that format of image, so prominently displayed. Why is that? scope_creepTalk 14:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- If a series isn't out til late 2023, I wouldn't make an article to begin with. While I made sure, when creating the article for Artikulo 247, that there would be references including from third party sources to back up the article. The series is written in a neutral state, and all information in the article are backed up with a reliable source. The series already has begun filming which is also mentioned in the article. TheHotwiki (talk) 12:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stories from the Heart. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. scope_creepTalk 23:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Scope creep: I'm confused by this warning? What is this about now?TheHotwiki (talk) 00:29, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Adding number of seasons on infobox
Why did you remove my edit for adding number of seasons for Prima Donnas? They will have a second season and number of seasons are added to the info box if the season has been aired. Season one is already finished and season 2 is on the way so I don’t understand your removal from the info box. 58.69.105.140 (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Season 2 hasn't aired fyi.TheHotwiki (talk) 16:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Please add 1 on number of season on the info box of The World Between Us since season 2 will release on November 22. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.69.105.140 (talk) 23:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah just no, because thats misinformation. The series took a break, it doesn't mean its returning for a 2nd season.TheHotwiki (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Speedy deletion nomination of Dapat Alam Mo!
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dapat Alam Mo!, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.gmanetwork.com/gtv/news/dapat_alam_mo/about. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 04:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
The file File:ControlYourselfSample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficiently supported by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
File:All I Have (Jennifer Lopez song - sample).ogg listed for discussion
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Makulay ang Buhay
Hello, Hotwiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Makulay ang Buhay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Twice singles discography
Look at the Wikipedia page for The Feels it is in the Formula of Love: O+T=<3 or even better use any music streaming service The Feels is in the Album. Lightoil (talk) 11:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- So? it isn't the title track/single of the album, thats "Scientist".TheHotwiki (talk) 13:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- The single version of the song isn't even included in the physical edition of the album. Thats a single? Make it make sense.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
It is still a single in the album just because it is not in the physical album does not mean it not a single. An album can have more than one single not just the title track. Lightoil (talk) 03:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Please provide a statement from Jyp Entertainment in which it said The Feels is a single from Formula of Love: O+T=<3. We aren't going to base it in your own opinion.TheHotwiki (talk) 04:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
It is not my opinion that The Feels is a single, Twice released it as a single and added it to the album digitally. Furthermore, there is no we only you other pages on Wikipedia accept the fact that it is a single in the album. Lightoil (talk) 16:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thats just your assumption that it was a single. Feel free to find a reliable source next time.TheHotwiki (talk) 20:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Question
Hi Hotwiki, not sure if you're able to answer my queries. I'm curious on what is considered as multinational boy/girl group and what isn't, take Kep1er for example and compared to Twice. For instance, Kep1er has 3 foreign members (2 Japanese and 1 Chinese) while Twice has 4 foreign members (3 Japanese and 1 Taiwanese), however for the former, the lead listed the group as multinational girl group while Twice is just girl group hence how does the multinational term works given that Kep1er is active in South Korea only with no planned activities in Japan nor other countries as far as I'm awared of. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Just clarification, I'm not planning to change Twice lead section but would like to understand more on, how the multinational term works. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll: I think both girl groups are first and foremost seen as K-Pop artists, especially their main market is South Korea; with their songs mostly sung in Korean language. TheHotwiki (talk) 14:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Hotwiki Yes both girl group main market is South Korea, but what about the multinational term usage is it's correct/appropriate for inclusion on Kep1er? — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll: I really don't know what to say, since I haven't edited on Kepler's wikipedia page. But in my opinion, regardless whether half of the members aren't from South Korea or not - iirc they were formed in South Korean survival show, and the group is based on South Korea.TheHotwiki (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Hotwiki No problem thanks you for your opinion. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll: I really don't know what to say, since I haven't edited on Kepler's wikipedia page. But in my opinion, regardless whether half of the members aren't from South Korea or not - iirc they were formed in South Korean survival show, and the group is based on South Korea.TheHotwiki (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Hotwiki Yes both girl group main market is South Korea, but what about the multinational term usage is it's correct/appropriate for inclusion on Kep1er? — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Paper9oll: I think both girl groups are first and foremost seen as K-Pop artists, especially their main market is South Korea; with their songs mostly sung in Korean language. TheHotwiki (talk) 14:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lookatme-ukregularcd.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
First Lady mainspace
Please return the First Lady series article to main space since the show will release on February 2022.
https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/showbiz/chikaminute/818277/sanya-lopez-goes-from-yaya-to-royalty-in-trailer-of-first-lady/story/?amp — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.54.102.0 (talk) 07:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Please reply thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.54.102.0 (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
The voice of Popo in Jollitown is Charmaine Cordoviz
https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/people.php?id=15925 and iMDB said so. The professional voice actor said on her Facebook profile that she created the Anime News Network page and all the information there is true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrabbyPatty1999 (talk • contribs) 11:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Your personal assumption about me is unnecessary and unwarranted. Also learn to find a reliable source. Not a fansite and certainly not IMDb.TheHotwiki (talk) 12:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
The file File:JessicaTakeMyBreathAwaySample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficiently supported by critical commentary, or easily conveyed in text. Not contextually significant to the song (or recording).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JustifyMyLoveSample.ogg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
The file File:FreeMeSample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficiently supported by critical commentary, or easily conveyed in text. Not contextually significant to Free Me (Emma Bunton song).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
New discussion at Talk:Wowowin
Hello Hotwiki, you may consider checking out the discussion that I opened at the article's talkpage. Thanks! VictorTorres2002 (talk) 04:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
The file File:MaybeSample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Portion of song Maybe (Emma Bunton song) not adequately proven as contextually significant to the whole song itself. Possibly easily conveyed in text.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
Thank for formatting the dates of the ref I have provided, I'll try to not forget formatting. I have a question if is it really necessary to format the date of the ref to mdy manually if the article is already using mdy template? —Ctrlwiki (talk) 11:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Regarding your edits
Hey, you've mass semi reverted edits such as this with the edit summary of "Unnecessary". Ignoring the fact that this specific edit of yours introduced MOS:LAYOUT issues (moving down the short description template, removing the extra line before the stub template), your edits are just unhelpful. Having consistent spacing helps when reading infobox templates. That is also how Template:Infobox television's own guideline says to use it. Please stop with your edits and discuses it on the template talk page. Gonnym (talk) 09:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Ways to improve Raising Mamay
Hello, Hotwiki,
Thank you for creating Raising Mamay.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the show in reliable sources when available
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Atlantic306 (talk) 01:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Ways to improve False Positive (TV series)
Hello, Hotwiki,
Thank you for creating False Positive (TV series).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the series in reliable sources when available
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Atlantic306 (talk) 21:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
I Heart You, Pare!
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Sumanuil. 02:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- You should use the edit summary as well, as you failed to explain your edits in that article. Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 04:13, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I DID EXPLAIN. TWICE. Sumanuil. 04:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- If you look at your contributions page, you don't use the edit summary for your every single edit. Please politely take this advice and move on, thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 05:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
But I did for those. Read them or not, they're still there. Sumanuil. 06:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- look at your contributions page, you don't use the edit summary for your every edit. Your first edit in that article was unexplained. Are you going to keep this discussion going because you can't let it go or you simply just want to have the last word? Okay. Move on and use the edit summary.TheHotwiki (talk) 06:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
I made the mistake of assuming that no one would revert it without checking what it did. Silly me, assuming others do their due diligence. And so what if I didn't explain other edits? Those aren't in question. But you are right that I should move on. This could go on indefinitely and that doesn't do any good. So I will. Sumanuil. 07:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Ways to improve Jose & Maria's Bonggang Villa
Hello, Hotwiki,
Thank you for creating Jose & Maria's Bonggang Villa.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the series in reliable sources
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Atlantic306 (talk) 17:01, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Hotwiki
Thank you for creating Bolera.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 19:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Your definition of "digital-only discography"
As you said on Twice's discography talk page, you literally said that if a single has been included on digital only album, it doesn't count as single. I'm wondering where you get this definition? -GogoLion (talk) 07:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Because the Feels wasn't a single from Formula of Love. JYP Entertainment never labeled it as a single from that album fyi. How is it a single when the single version is not even included in the physical edition? TheHotwiki (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LoveSample.ogg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Pepito Manaloto part 2
hey. I just defended you lol. I support you. 49.144.72.74 (talk) 09:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
GMA Regional Newscast
Hi I would like to seek assistance in editing/cleaning the articles of all GMA Regional Newscasts, there some users who are posting unnecessary information in the article.
Thank you. CommanderPhoenix (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Wall Philippines title card.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:The Wall Philippines title card.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HiwilmsTalk 10:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
File:WhatIAmSample.ogg listed for discussion
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
South Korean girl groups
Am on a break from Wikipedia atm so won't see reply till tomorrow. But I wanted to pop in to ask if u thought about going to ANI because of the edit warring on that page? Considering u went to increase pp and were told to warn the user but go to ANI if they resumed edit warring. And I left an edit warring notice on their talk but they carried on anyway with u having to deal with it? Stephanie921 (talk) 19:34, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think I could send a report to ANI about whatis happening in that article. I only want an article protection for that article, which I don't understand why it isn't protected yet to ip users.TheHotwiki (talk) 20:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Had some spare time to reply to this. Why don't you think you could send an ANI report? They're edit warring seems like it would at least get them temp blocked. And if u don't want that I suggest going to increase protection again and explaining why u only want protection, not ANI Stephanie921 (talk) 20:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sending a report to ANI is too much effort for me, especially with different IP users involved.TheHotwiki (talk) 20:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Had some spare time to reply to this. Why don't you think you could send an ANI report? They're edit warring seems like it would at least get them temp blocked. And if u don't want that I suggest going to increase protection again and explaining why u only want protection, not ANI Stephanie921 (talk) 20:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ah ok, I get u Stephanie921 (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
File:IfThatWereMeSample.ogg listed for discussion
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
September 2022
Hello I'm Noobguy33. I just saw about the edit in the State of the Nation that you removed the edit of a IP or user I guess so I reverted to the IP's edit but I reverted to your edit because he owns Philippine television wikipedia right? Instead of reverting it you should add reference because I also saw that in my old edit in Frontpage: Ulat ni Mel Tiangco you literally reverted my freaking edit because it was "Trivial". If you don't do anything right, just stop editing articles about the Philippine television, I know that non-Filipinos can edit Philippine television articles because there is no rules of editing about Philippines (Television articles, Politician articles, or Transport articles about the Philippines) but please, just stop owning the aforementioned articles. But I didn't asked you to stop editing Philippine television articles. Noobguy33Talk 01:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Resorting to personal attacks and telling your fellow editors to "shut up" isn't a good look. I suggest you refrain going low, or you will be reported to the administrators.TheHotwiki (talk) 03:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
I apologize. But please, just stop owning Philippine television articles especially on GMA Network programs because you are owning it. But I didn't asked you to stop editing the article. Everyone can edit the articles about the GMA Network related articles but ok I won't edit the articles that you are owning. I will focus on editing about the Transport, the Celebrities, the Politicians. I guess everyone especially the IPs are probably mad at you because they think (like me) that you own the articles. Noobguy33Talk 09:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- I am not owning anything. Please stop attacking me before I report you, thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 06:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm not attacking you but I apologize for what I did though. Noobguy33Talk 04:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Speaking of my mistaken removal...
I supposed to 'restore' the All-Out Sundays main hosts when I removed Christian Bautista (What I remembered in the previous revisions, both Alden Richards and Julie Anne San Jose are only listed)
My apologies. PJ Santos (talk) 09:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Do not remove my subject.
Can you just refrain from removing my topic in your talk page? WikiCentral24 (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- You are trolling my talk page, for posting unexplained warnings. Do this again and you will reported straight to the administrators. Also, this is my talk page, I can remove things and especially troll messages if I want to.TheHotwiki (talk) 07:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Abusive admin
I gave the attribution using the templates you yourself sent me and i stopped making my own Plots since you didnt like them either so what do you want for real? Thank you Bradleyk360 (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not an administrator and please refrain from personally attacking editors.TheHotwiki (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
But you are abusive? You mislead me and remove my content falsely accusing me for weeks. I dont want to attack you but you are a little unfair? Bradleyk360 (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
You make pages less attractive
I dont know what is your issue with GMA Network but you clearly Dont know that you consistently acting like the boss of their pages for TV Shows deleting premises again and again doesnt Help. The pages are not attractive without a plot. You can block me, i will still edit until you do so. You are abusive and make no sense, everyone has a right to contribute. I Made these Plots myself first but you so didnt like them that you deleted them and lied about me copying. Now that i actually learn how to Attribute and do it, you complain again. Did you not ask me to make attributions? Since 2005 is a long time being on the Internet annoying people. You should consider take a break for everyone's peace of mind. Bradleyk360 (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
The file File:NeverBeTheSameAgainSample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
justification for sample usage not well illustrated in the song article. sample unnecessary to help readers contextualize and understand the whole song. the sample's role similar to the article's: promoting (awareness of) and marketing the song just by song title and artist's name, both searchable. may fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
File:MyHeartWillGoOnSample.ogg listed for discussion
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
License tagging for File:The Clash season 5 title card.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Clash season 5 title card.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Someone in Eat Bulaga! article added Alden Richards as the former cast...
There is a editor (obviously not me) added Alden Richards to the former host of Eat Bulaga. I accidentally added dash on it and I removed it because it was unreferenced. Did I do wrong or not? WikiCentral24 (talk) 14:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Hotwiki!
Hotwiki,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 04:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 04:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Maria Clara at Ibarra
How is it fake news. The one I added was an official source and not its tabloid section. So please put my edit back please.
https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/arts-and-culture/2023/01/25/2239907/last-4-weeks-maria-clara-ibarra-writers-reveal-plot-twist-not-rizals-novels 122.54.102.0 (talk) 13:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for The Real Housewives of Atlanta
The Real Housewives of Atlanta has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Picture and audio format of LIVE broadcasts on GMA Network
Why the warning and reverts, @Hotwiki? I'd like to ask you a few questions for clarifications:
- Have you seen LIVE broadcasts of GMA in 4K? If so, which platform? (cable, streaming, etc.)
- Have you heard LIVE broadcasts of GMA in 5.1 surround sound? Which platform too, if there's any?
By LIVE, I mean newscasts and particular shows.
I think that you may have misunderstood and cited a similar article regarding GMA's second phase on digitization.
Though they have the capability, there are still no implementation of this on their live broadcasts nor their live-streams.
With regards with their TV series and other shows (such as "Mga Lihim Ni Urduja"), I would gladly accept that they could be produced in 4K and surround sound since they underwent post-production.
GMA is broadcasted across the country and it is an evident public record that they are still in SDTV on television and in HDTV quality on live-streams. They also do not offer any 4K feeds with 5.1 sound even on cable or on-demand platforms. I don't get why I need citation more than you do on insisting that detail.
Let's discuss this. Let it be known that I don't mean any harm to the page and I assure you that I am editing in good faith.
P.S. I also wish they are broadcasting live in 4K and 5.1 but that's almost impossible even in developed countries. FrostFleece (talk) 11:31, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Stop using your assumptions in Wikipedia. How about finding reliable sources? Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 11:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Whoa, did you even read? I'm trying to discuss this as civil as I can. Get off your high horse. Please also provide sources; it applies to you too.
- Don't be high-maintenance, @Hotwiki. FrostFleece (talk) 11:54, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- You have failed to provide a single reference to any of your edits and thats why you are being reverted. The next time you edit war, you will be reported straight to administrators for edit warring and changing content without posting a reliable source.TheHotwiki (talk) 12:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- You are failing to see my point, @Hotwiki and I am sorry. You keep greeting me with warnings and unfriendly responses so I engaged too. As I said, I want this resolved as civil as possible. I am simply trying to make you understand in full detail, so PLEASE, hear me out.
- Let's discuss one more time on this:
- Now, while this article states that GMA is undergoing upgrades, it does not mean every show is in 4K now. Only select shows make it to Netflix which you are trying to insist that every show is made to comply with Netflix standards. (I've seen your kind remark on your edits.)
- To make even a stronger point Eat Bulaga! and other news programs such as 24 Oras is not on Netflix and is never made for the platform. This alone is strong evidence. To reiterate once more, I am talking about LIVE broadcasts.
- To add, TAPE—Eat Bulaga! producer—is a blocktimer for the network and a separate entity.. GMA News is also struggling to have LIVE regional content in 16:9 HDTV.
- Now, why I do not have "sources"
- You can simply turn on the television and see for yourself. It is common knowledge. I cannot lie for something that is publicly known and shown.
- Only you insist that I find "sources" for picture and audio format. Virtually all Wikipedia pages for TV shows does not necessarily require any citations for these parameters.
- Though there are content produced in 4K. GMA Network does not officially offer any 4K broadcast with 5.1 surround sound feature nor stream LIVE 4K content online. To state the obvious, GMA content on Netflix are not LIVE if you insist.
- FINAL POINT : Sure, we will get there; for now, we simply wait for tangible information on actual 4K and 5.1 broadcast. I. would. love. that. too!
- To make it clear again, I am editing here in good faith nor start a war with you. If you insist on your threats and behavior, I will also gladly take this discussion to the next level and I do not want that for both of us. Please don't take this reply as a threat but more of a friendly discussion.
- @Hotwiki, please do not bite the newcomers. Thank you. FrostFleece (talk) 14:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Again where is your reference? You are not a representative of GMA Network to just change things in the article of their shows and expect editors here to just allow you to get away with unreferenced edits. Learn to post references. You will be reported the next time you make an unreferenced edit.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- ARE YOU REALLY READING MY REPLIES? I've listed my reasons above. IN BULLET FORM for easier understanding.
- You are not a representative of GMA either to police and gatekeep these pages religiously. What if I am a representative? Do I need your approval too?
- Let me say this once that your edits are nothing but pure assumptions from that article. You are full of threats instead of discussing things civilly. Your talk page shows it all. FrostFleece (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- I've read everything and its not an excuse for you not to post a reference. So again, attach a reference to your next edit. Follow the rules. Thank you. If you have any questions, feel free to contact an administrator. This will be my final response to you in my talk page.TheHotwiki (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Again where is your reference? You are not a representative of GMA Network to just change things in the article of their shows and expect editors here to just allow you to get away with unreferenced edits. Learn to post references. You will be reported the next time you make an unreferenced edit.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- You have failed to provide a single reference to any of your edits and thats why you are being reverted. The next time you edit war, you will be reported straight to administrators for edit warring and changing content without posting a reliable source.TheHotwiki (talk) 12:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Stop using your assumptions in Wikipedia. How about finding reliable sources? Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 11:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 01:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sarap at Home title card.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Kylie Minogue videography
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kylie Minogue videography, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kylie Minogue videography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Kahn.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Updating chart positions
Hotwiki, I just reverted an IP editor for not changing the source when they updated the peak on Padam Padam (song). I expected better of an experienced editor than this. I understand you may have forgot, but please don't forget in future. Ss112 07:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, I'm gonna fix it when I look up the sources posted in the article.TheHotwiki (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dobol B sa News TV title card.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Underage (TV series) title card.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sarap Diva title card.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of artists with the most UK top-ten singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN for deletion
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Re: Saksi edits
Hey. I'm currently finding sources for those content you keep on removing. I think 24 hours is not enough for finding sources. A more diplomatic approach is to just add "citation needed" instead of removing content. -WayKurat (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Also, not every sentence in this article needs sources. You should check TV Patrol as it contains a lot of trivial content. -WayKurat (talk) 02:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- @WayKurat: I will just go ahead and report you to the administrators as you don't know how to work well with other editors. All the changes I've done in that section was all reverted by you. Also you have reverted the article more than 3 times in 24 hours, which is a clear violation of Wikipedia:3RR.TheHotwiki (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Hotwiki: Don't shoot yourself in the foot. You insinuated an edit war by removing that content while I'm in the process of finding sources. -WayKurat (talk) 03:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- And after 24 hours, there was none. And it is still not valid reason to revert back unreferenced content / trivial content. Every change I made in that section (which goes back to 2020, 3 years ago) were reverted by you. You had all those years/months to add more references fyi to back up those unreferenced content you keep restoring for some reason. I will discuss more of this when I filed a report. TheHotwiki (talk) 03:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Hotwiki: Don't shoot yourself in the foot. You insinuated an edit war by removing that content while I'm in the process of finding sources. -WayKurat (talk) 03:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- @WayKurat: I will just go ahead and report you to the administrators as you don't know how to work well with other editors. All the changes I've done in that section was all reverted by you. Also you have reverted the article more than 3 times in 24 hours, which is a clear violation of Wikipedia:3RR.TheHotwiki (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GMA Headline News title card.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:News at Seven title card.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
The article Centerstage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2020
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you removed miniseries? The source I added there was reliable so yes some gma dramas don’t end in a year but if a reliable source said miniseries I think that’s to put miniseries in there since that’s the rule of sources in Wikipedia guidelines. Let me understand please. 120.28.185.206 (talk) 13:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I already explained why in the article through my edit summary why is it removed. Just because GMA Network labeled it as a "miniseries", it doesn't mean Wikipedia article should mention it, when in fact most GMA series only last for less than a year. Its trivial and does nothing to the article. Please read Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a newspaper, you don't need dictate every word from GMA Network's press releases in Wikipedia.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
I'm In Love With My Boss
World Premiere: Jan. 15, 2024 on GMA Afternoon Prime replacing "Fast Talk with Boy Abunda" on its timeslot SeanPedia (SP) (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- You're telling me this because?TheHotwiki (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Asawa ng Asawa Ko moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Asawa ng Asawa Ko. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FULBERT (talk) 00:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Asawa ng Asawa Ko has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
FULBERT (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Lilet Attias: Attorney-at-Law has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Lilet Attias: Attorney-at-Law until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Spaces between entries on discographies
Hotwiki, nobody has ever had an issue—or if they have, nobody has ever expressed it—with "which lines to edit" on discographies. Besides, entries are already separated with |-, which distinguishes each. The spaces were inconsistently applied and look odd, like somebody's added a blank line by mistake. There really is no visual benefit to adding them where they weren't previously, and I also don't think it's necessary and seems overly fiddly to remove quotation marks from scope="row" and scope="col" when MOS:DTT tells us to format them that way. I could be wrong, but AFAIK, the quotation marks help differentiate the value for the scopes for table software. For example, removing the quotation marks around the values of the table after class= results in plainrowheaders not being able to be applied, so the quotation marks have benefits where you might not expect them to. Thanks. Ss112 07:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Again, as I explained before in one of those articles, those "spaces" were added in the editing box, so editors would have an easier time to spot things when editing the article. The Red Velvet and Twice discography pages are full with external links that. Personally speaking, I had a hard time spotting the next entry (album/single/song). The spaces made it easier. Also those extra spaces don't even show up in the article itself anyway. Only those who edit the article will see the extra spaces. So I don't see the need for you to make it a big deal by removing them all. As for removing quotation marks, they aren't needed. They were removed and didn't damage the article.TheHotwiki (talk) 07:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I think you mean citations, not external links. I've never had a hard time distinguishing each entry and I can't say I've seen any concerns raised anywhere else (talk pages, edit summaries) by other editors that would justify the need to start introducing spaces to table code where they were not previously. You are not the only editor of these articles and this appears to be solely for your personal benefit, when I and at least one other editor that I've noticed have removed them. As for removing quotation marks, I say if it's not broke, don't fix it—nor change it. There's no need to take away things like that. Ss112 11:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- You were/are the only one that had/have an issue with those changes (extra spaces/removing of quotation marks). I don't remember anyone aside from you, directly voicing their disagreement towards me with those extra spaces. Also didn't you already remove those extra spaces and I didn't react when you removed those and I didn't add them back when you removed those. So why in the world are you stressing me out in the talk page, to the extra spaces that you already removed anyway? Also take your advice, those changes didn't break the article for you to be fixing/changing them. Fyi, I'm editing using my cellphone, and like I said, "personally speaking", it was hard to spot. If thats hard to understand, then we can just agree to disagree. You already removed those extra spaces and I didn't argue by the way, to bring those back, for you to be barking on my talk page like as if I did something so offensive to the article. What happened to assuming good faith to other editors? You are acting so agressive in my talk page and I don't appreciate it.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- May I add. Nkon21, removing extra spaces last month in the Twice singles discography[1] - that editor actually didn't address me in their edits, about extra spaces. I didn't think that editor had issues with those "extra spaces". Unlike you SS12, that editor only deleted few extra spaces and I brought back those extra spaces for the consistency of the article. When you removed those extra spaces in Red Velvet discography last month[2], I have yet to make any changes to that article since then fyi. Today, in Twice singles discography[3] when you deleted those extra spaces, I also have yet to make any changes to that article since then. It just seems so out of the blue, you are suddenly bringing this up now in my talk page, when you already removed those "extra spaces" anyway. The Red Velvet extra spaces erasure was already last month. In both articles, I didn't say anything (until you posted in my talkpage) when you removed those extra spaces, and I didn't try to revert your edits as well for you to be having a reaction. TheHotwiki (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't feel I'm being aggressive nor "barking", and I'm certainly not here to "stress you out". I'm not saying all of this as if you had taken issue with my edit(s) nor did I say that you didn't make the edits in good faith. But just because someone is editing in good faith doesn't mean another editor can't or won't disagree with their edits. Regarding "I am the only one who had/has an issue with those changes", Nkon21 directly went to the trouble of restoring all the quotation marks and you reverted them removing spaces between chart names and between some singles, which certainly tells me they had an issue with them not being there and gave me reason to think you may revert or take issue with my edits, so I came here to address it. That's what I was referring to with "at least one other editor". Concerning "take your [own] advice", I was undoing a change you made that didn't need to be made because it wasn't broken in the first place. I know and you've explained why you made the edits, there's no real need for the discussion to go on, but I'm only saying this in the hopes you don't introduce such changes to other articles unnecessarily. That's my reason for being here. The last thing I want to say is I am sure you can do a lot more beneficial things then spending your time, as I'm sure it took quite a bit of time, to remove every instance of quotation marks in scope="col", scope="row" and row- and colspan values when it doesn't need to be done. Ss112 15:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Its not an issue in my opinion. Me adding extra spaces and removing quotation marks in the table, didn't damage the article and I had good reasoning for it. Also, like I've already said, you already removed those extra spaces and I didn't do anything about it. TheHotwiki (talk) 15:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- What was the "good reasoning" for removing the quotation marks? You even said it doesn't make a difference, so I don't see the need to spend time removing them. Ss112 15:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I removed quotation marks (" ") because the colspan/rowspan still work without them, and it makes the editing box look cleaner. Are you actually having problems with the removals of those? Like I've said it doesn't affect the articles, for you to be making this, a big deal. I'm not also edit warring with you in those articles, for you to be having a reaction. So do you want to keep adding quotation marks when using colspan/rowspan, when I know it doesn't make any difference?TheHotwiki (talk) 15:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- ?? I was only talking about you removing them, not me "adding" them. They are present in almost all instances of users creating tables. I'm confused. I think this discussion has worn out its use. I don't think you need to spend time removing something what you admit makes no difference. I don't think it looks neater; I think it looks better with them present, and for any potential issue with the HTML formatting down the line I think it's better to retain them. That's all. Thanks. Ss112 15:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I removed quotation marks (" ") because the colspan/rowspan still work without them, and it makes the editing box look cleaner. Are you actually having problems with the removals of those? Like I've said it doesn't affect the articles, for you to be making this, a big deal. I'm not also edit warring with you in those articles, for you to be having a reaction. So do you want to keep adding quotation marks when using colspan/rowspan, when I know it doesn't make any difference?TheHotwiki (talk) 15:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- What was the "good reasoning" for removing the quotation marks? You even said it doesn't make a difference, so I don't see the need to spend time removing them. Ss112 15:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Its not an issue in my opinion. Me adding extra spaces and removing quotation marks in the table, didn't damage the article and I had good reasoning for it. Also, like I've already said, you already removed those extra spaces and I didn't do anything about it. TheHotwiki (talk) 15:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't feel I'm being aggressive nor "barking", and I'm certainly not here to "stress you out". I'm not saying all of this as if you had taken issue with my edit(s) nor did I say that you didn't make the edits in good faith. But just because someone is editing in good faith doesn't mean another editor can't or won't disagree with their edits. Regarding "I am the only one who had/has an issue with those changes", Nkon21 directly went to the trouble of restoring all the quotation marks and you reverted them removing spaces between chart names and between some singles, which certainly tells me they had an issue with them not being there and gave me reason to think you may revert or take issue with my edits, so I came here to address it. That's what I was referring to with "at least one other editor". Concerning "take your [own] advice", I was undoing a change you made that didn't need to be made because it wasn't broken in the first place. I know and you've explained why you made the edits, there's no real need for the discussion to go on, but I'm only saying this in the hopes you don't introduce such changes to other articles unnecessarily. That's my reason for being here. The last thing I want to say is I am sure you can do a lot more beneficial things then spending your time, as I'm sure it took quite a bit of time, to remove every instance of quotation marks in scope="col", scope="row" and row- and colspan values when it doesn't need to be done. Ss112 15:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- May I add. Nkon21, removing extra spaces last month in the Twice singles discography[1] - that editor actually didn't address me in their edits, about extra spaces. I didn't think that editor had issues with those "extra spaces". Unlike you SS12, that editor only deleted few extra spaces and I brought back those extra spaces for the consistency of the article. When you removed those extra spaces in Red Velvet discography last month[2], I have yet to make any changes to that article since then fyi. Today, in Twice singles discography[3] when you deleted those extra spaces, I also have yet to make any changes to that article since then. It just seems so out of the blue, you are suddenly bringing this up now in my talk page, when you already removed those "extra spaces" anyway. The Red Velvet extra spaces erasure was already last month. In both articles, I didn't say anything (until you posted in my talkpage) when you removed those extra spaces, and I didn't try to revert your edits as well for you to be having a reaction. TheHotwiki (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- You were/are the only one that had/have an issue with those changes (extra spaces/removing of quotation marks). I don't remember anyone aside from you, directly voicing their disagreement towards me with those extra spaces. Also didn't you already remove those extra spaces and I didn't react when you removed those and I didn't add them back when you removed those. So why in the world are you stressing me out in the talk page, to the extra spaces that you already removed anyway? Also take your advice, those changes didn't break the article for you to be fixing/changing them. Fyi, I'm editing using my cellphone, and like I said, "personally speaking", it was hard to spot. If thats hard to understand, then we can just agree to disagree. You already removed those extra spaces and I didn't argue by the way, to bring those back, for you to be barking on my talk page like as if I did something so offensive to the article. What happened to assuming good faith to other editors? You are acting so agressive in my talk page and I don't appreciate it.TheHotwiki (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I think you mean citations, not external links. I've never had a hard time distinguishing each entry and I can't say I've seen any concerns raised anywhere else (talk pages, edit summaries) by other editors that would justify the need to start introducing spaces to table code where they were not previously. You are not the only editor of these articles and this appears to be solely for your personal benefit, when I and at least one other editor that I've noticed have removed them. As for removing quotation marks, I say if it's not broke, don't fix it—nor change it. There's no need to take away things like that. Ss112 11:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Again, as I explained before in one of those articles, those "spaces" were added in the editing box, so editors would have an easier time to spot things when editing the article. The Red Velvet and Twice discography pages are full with external links that. Personally speaking, I had a hard time spotting the next entry (album/single/song). The spaces made it easier. Also those extra spaces don't even show up in the article itself anyway. Only those who edit the article will see the extra spaces. So I don't see the need for you to make it a big deal by removing them all. As for removing quotation marks, they aren't needed. They were removed and didn't damage the article.TheHotwiki (talk) 07:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Shining Inheritance (Philippine TV series) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shining Inheritance (Philippine TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Shining Inheritance (Philippine TV series) for deletion
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shining Inheritance (Philippine TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Cast of some GMA shows
Why are the roles of the cast of some GMA shows (i.e. Spooky Nights; skip to section "Siyam") not listed in the articles? RMXY (talk • contribs) 00:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't create that article and its cast/characters section. Also there's a talk page for the article of that show. Discuss it there. TheHotwiki (talk) 00:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
GMA drama series articles
It would be nice if you add links to the GMA drama series genres in their articles since it’s already common to do so on a tv series article. If you’ve seen all tv series articles of different countries both the article and info box has links so it can be made. 120.28.248.11 (talk) 14:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Philippine television drama is already linked in the opening line of those articles to begin with. Also, genres are also linked in the infobox and the lead section already has too many links. No need to plaster the lead section adozen of links. TheHotwiki (talk) 14:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Pahiram ng Sandali
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pahiram ng Sandali, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indio (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Morales.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ringardiumleviossa (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Regarding full stop.
@Hotwiki, I think we should remove the period from the honorary members in List of X-Men members. I am not going to edit war with you so I am leaving a discussion at your talk unlike previous talks about this in Talk:List of X-Men members. Removing pronouns I get it but not removing full stop? Recently commas were removed between months and years because it was correct grammatical rule. If you have anything like wikipedia rules pages that say we can put full stop in the table even after just words or description, then it is good to stay there. Though I think removing full stop will be better from grammar perspective. Sewnbegun (talk) 06:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- The two word description is fine as it is, so as the period. Leave it as it is. Hotwiki (talk) 06:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is not fine and it is just a full stop, why can't we remove it on the basis of grammatical rules? Sewnbegun (talk) 06:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agree to disagree. Its such a minor detail. Let it go, thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 06:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sure I will but let me get confirmed by questioning here first. Sewnbegun (talk) 06:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agree to disagree. Its such a minor detail. Let it go, thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 06:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is not fine and it is just a full stop, why can't we remove it on the basis of grammatical rules? Sewnbegun (talk) 06:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)