Jump to content

User talk:Herodyswaroop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Herodyswaroop, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 09:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha (March 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Herodyswaroop! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


How to fix unsigned comments?

1. Add the template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{2}}}|{{{2}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{2}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{2}}}|contribs]])

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Herodyswaroop! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:08, Wednesday, April 26, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together
[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to G. Janardhana Reddy. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir, Will try to strengthen the article by adding more content and referrence. Herodyswaroop (talk) 06:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Herodyswaroop! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:04, Friday, May 5, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha (May 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please compare and combine draft and article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Robert McClenon I don't know, how to merge it. can you plz explain or share an article regarding it - Herodyswaroop (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You can edit the article to add any information that is currently in the draft but not the article. There is no special procedure for the merge. Just edit the article boldly. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok @Robert McClenon - Herodyswaroop (talk) 06:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chittam Maharani has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chittam Maharani. Thanks! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:34, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chittam Maharani (September 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OLI 09:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha

[edit]

Hello, Herodyswaroop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hi @Explicit, As I got the merge notice. I have added the content on the main article. And thanks for deleting the draft. Thank you. -Herodyswaroop (talk) 07:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use the history of an article to find the last good known version

[edit]

Hi, Herodyswaroop! You can always use the history of an article to find the last known good version of an article & then restore that. 92.50.99.194 had vandalized the Lauren Hutton article, but the previous version was okay. Peaceray (talk) 17:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh understood, Thank you @Peaceray Herodyswaroop (talk) 07:41, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on V. V. Lakshminarayana

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page V. V. Lakshminarayana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chittam Maharani

[edit]

Hello, Herodyswaroop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chittam Maharani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prasannavadanam moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Prasannavadanam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Liz Read! Talk! 06:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Liz, thanks for your suggestion, I don't want to add the plot and other details as it is thriller. Let it be in drafts, will develop it. Once the movie is off the theatre's. Thank you.
- Herodyswaroop (talk) 13:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karthik Tallam moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Karthik Tallam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 00:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, will try to work on the draft and will update you - Herodyswaroop (talk) 13:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Clearfrienda Hi Sir/Madam, I actually took this subject to be written on Wikipedia, for the reason.
  1. https://www.business-standard.com/india-news/cambodia-job-scam-60-rescued-2-days-after-stranded-indians-stage-revolt-124052200564_1.html. Many of the indian students where stuck in the Cambodia, with a job fraud. Though it came in new by july. From April there was talks about it on Social Media. From the same time, I came to know about "Honarary consuls" who were appointed by countries to solve the issues, Then i found about this subject, Who stays in our country. But can directly, talk to king of cambodia on official capacity. He has proper notable articles, official websites and documents. I took utmost care, to follow wiki guidelines to frame the article. I used citations bots as well to get the best output. Its been still in drafts, I tried to speak about in IRC channel, but unfortunately today servers were not working. I would love if you can look into the matter, Thank you - Herodyswaroop (talk) 06:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I won't re-review your article but I can give you a few suggestions:
  • To meet the general notability guidelines, the subject must have significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. A good number to look for is 3 in-depth independent, reliable sources about the subject. Those sources should also be independent from each other. A good place to look for sources, in my experience, is Google news. If you find 3 articles in 3 reliable newspapers entirely about the subject, then you're probably in good shape.
  • Make sure, especially because the subject is a living person, that all statements can be verified with an inline citation.
  • Make sure that the article is written in the neutral point of view that you would expect to see in an encyclopedia.
Unfortunately Articles for Creation is very backlogged right now — there are almost 3000 drafts waiting for review at any given time — so it could be a while (I'd say no more than 2 months from now). Don't be discouraged, though, there's lots of stuff to do on Wikipedia, and you could always start another article in the meantime. Let me know if you have any other questions. Happy editing! C F A 💬 15:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vinay Maloo (executive)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vinay Maloo (executive) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BoraVoro (talk) 07:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vinay Maloo (executive)

[edit]
Notice

The article Vinay Maloo (executive) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Whpq (talk) 11:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- @Whpq Brother, I am bit confused. You mean to say that I can edit the article right?. But I shouldn't delete the tags? Herodyswaroop (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It means that you provided no source at all for the article which is a biography about a living person. Another editor has added a source. You can continue to edit the article. -- Whpq (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vinay Maloo

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vinay Maloo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pridemanty (talk) 08:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vinay Maloo moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Vinay Maloo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers Thank you sir, Will add more citations and proper detailing based on Wikiguidelines. And then shift the article. Thank you. Herodyswaroop (talk) 11:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinay Maloo 2 (July 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Note: The draft is largely identical to Draft:Vinay Maloo which was created by another user and was declined in AfC in April.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 16:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are two problems with the sourcing: 1) a lack of reliable, independent, and secondary sources; 2) several sources that are clearly paid promotion, including multiple copies of the same recently published promo piece. --bonadea contributions talk 16:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vinay Maloo 2 has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vinay Maloo 2. Thanks! – bradv 18:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pottel moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Pottel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because not ready for mainspace. only if released. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DareshMohan (talk) 00:40, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @DareshMohan Will work on this article, as mentioned by you " Only if released or If we get a release date" and submit for mainspace. Meanwhile will pickup some other genre and will work on it. Thank you. - Herodyswaroop (talk) 08:34, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karthik Tallam (September 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OhHaiMark were:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fitpass moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Fitpass. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Please read WP:CITEKILL and WP:ORGDEPTH. There are plenty of sources, but almost nothing that's independent and secondary, and very little depth.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 10:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pottel (October 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 10:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea Hi Sir, Gone through the Wikipedia movie notability guidelines.
  1. A movie should have fixed release date - So, i have added references to it.
  2. A critic should mention about the movie - https://x.com/taran_adarsh/status/1843275192438870471
So, cited above link.
3. Movie should be a film of Major actor/actress. I have mention the protagonist Ms.Ananya nagalla who is top heroine in the concerned industry.
Before resubmitting the article, just guide me. If my understanding of the guidelines are proper.
Thank you. Herodyswaroop (talk) 07:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fitpass for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fitpass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fitpass until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

bonadea contributions talk 20:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Teri Baaton Mein Aisa Uljha jiya

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Herodyswaroop. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teri Baaton Mein Aisa Uljha jiya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pottel (October 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 18:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pottel

[edit]

after release when reviews are released. It will be notable. DareshMohan (talk) 07:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the category of Upcoming films? Like I have seen few articles like Matka (film), Can I do? Herodyswaroop (talk) 07:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Prasannavadanam

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Herodyswaroop. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prasannavadanam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Murivu (Film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Create films with only 2+ reliable reviews. For now, you can expand Draft:Murivu. DareshMohan (talk) 07:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DareshMohan No reviews found actually, Only low media mentioned. But loved it, when watched so. Added it. Will try to find the reviews. Atleast in some malayam papers and will submit. - Herodyswaroop (talk) 08:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, there was a review [1]. Best of luck... A film with many production sources will suffice. DareshMohan (talk) 08:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://nettv4u.com/movie-review/malayalam/muriv added this review . @DareshMohan - Herodyswaroop (talk) 10:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is Draft:Murivu (Film) and Draft:Murivu. Can you do Template:Db-author on the first one? There is only need to have one article not two. DareshMohan (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DareshMohan Did it, as said - Herodyswaroop (talk) 07:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nice -- it is article now. please expand plot. DareshMohan (talk) 09:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okie - Herodyswaroop (talk) 06:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DareshMohan Its still in draft, submitted for review. Herodyswaroop (talk) 07:15, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a huge discussion about it here User_talk:Jeraxmoira#Murivu. Since the film doesn't have two reviews and the editor who created it is under question, it is unclear about the article. DareshMohan (talk) 07:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DareshMohan Lol, Bro but one doubt. Are you investigating the sockpuppets? Or They have put sockpuppet investigation on you. - Herodyswaroop (talk) 08:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But issue with small movies is, poor guys. They dont have Pr and even money to get their Pr done, even review. But with OTT's we find many such good films.
Thats the reason i pick such films or actors to be written on Wikipedia. But big movies even before movie shooting starts they will have wikipedia page how? - Herodyswaroop (talk) 08:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Such is Wikipedia policy hence why most people only use Wikipedia and don't edit Wikipedia. For sure, Wikipedia is similar to the Tip of the iceberg. The more you edit here, the more problems you will see. Without a doubt, any film with two reliable reviews can get article but if not, just enjoy the movie and move on. 08:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murivu (November 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
2 or more multiple reviews please.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 15:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RangersRus Couldn't find 2 reviews, as the film was low on PR. So, I think no other go. Leaving the draft. - Herodyswaroop (talk) 15:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahkot (film) has been accepted

[edit]
Shahkot (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:05, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Committee Voting

[edit]

@Jayanthkumar123 @DareshMohan @Ab207 Hi, any Indian Wikipedians or Good Editors to whom I can vote. So, that it would be for a larger good.

As many usernames in the candidates list are very new to me and seems not from India - Herodyswaroop (talk) 08:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know much about these elections, so I might not advise you about it. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devendra Rajesh Kothe (November 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Devendra Rajesh Kothe instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 11:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HitroMilanese Hi, while editing the draft only, came to know that, the article already exixts. Can i get the template, to remove the draft? - Herodyswaroop (talk) 11:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The content of this draft, along with its history, is currently being discussed for potential merging with an article in the mainspace. Therefore, it may not be appropriate to delete it at this time. However, the draft creator has the option to request its deletion under WP:G7. Regards. Hitro talk 11:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it, you can do as per the guidelines. thank you - Herodyswaroop (talk) 12:06, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of free South India

[edit]

Hi @DareshMohan @Jayanthkumar123 @Ab207, Hey, Hi I have seen a newly created account spunning articles about,

  1. Anti north India Sentiment. 2. Nativism and regionalism I have observed even his userpage clearly mentions to free south india from north india. Though I am also south indian, I personally dont want such posionous content on Wikipedia. As firm believer of wiki guidelines, what should I do to bring to admins to notice? P.S: Whenever I am having a doubt, I am always intend to ping you guys, Is it a normal practise or will it come under sockpuppet? Please help with the both, Thank you - Herodyswaroop (talk) 07:32, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karthik Tallam (December 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Resubmitted without any improvement, previous decline still stands.

I should probably be rejecting this outright, it is extremely unlikely that an honorary consul is notable in any sense, but let's give it one more chance.

Please cut down on the WP:REFBOMBING, that short lead paragraph certainly does not require 13 citations!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okie, doing that - Herodyswaroop (talk) 08:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Herodyswaroop. Thank you for your work on Rahasyam Idam Jagath. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000 Thank you very much sir, I want to work more on Wikipedia. I am very curious to know about Wikidata and Wikibase as well. -Herodyswaroop (talk) 15:23, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year - 2025

[edit]

@DareshMohan @Jayanthkumar123 Happy new year, to my mentors both of you.

On a fun note, Jayanth bro is not leaving any small films too. Whatever I watch in prime or netflix and I think, this week I will write about this. Jayanth would have written, that already. Lol. - Herodyswaroop (talk) 10:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year :) Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 12:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vinay Maloo 2

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Herodyswaroop. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vinay Maloo 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As the draft has multiple issues and doesn't cater Notability. You can remove - Herodyswaroop (talk) 08:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Herodyswaroop&oldid=1266808280"