User talk:Haste1066

Welcome!

Hello, Haste1066, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.

Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!

P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.

Conflict of interest

Since you contributed File:John Borling and Wife.JPG, an intimate portrait of Borling and his wife, which you claim as your own work, I presume that you are closely related to Borling. You should read and understand Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy (as well as the policy on autobiographies, if that applies). Writing about yourself or subjects close to you is strongly discouraged due to the difficulty of mainting a neutral point of view. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Library work

On my user talk page you wrote "I work for a military Library and we do this for any notable officers we have texts or artifacts of. for a military Library and we do this for any notable officers we have texts or artifacts of." I note that General Borling is the only topic about which you've written. What other subjects has your library covered? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 01:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haste1066, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Haste1066! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Louise Elisabeth Robertson

Hi, I'm Megalibrarygirl. Haste1066, thanks for creating Louise Elisabeth Robertson!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I did a search for sources on this author and didn't come up with any reviews of her work. I am also having trouble finding additional sources to expand the article. If you have additional references from reliable sources, please add them or this article will face deletion. The author may be WP:TOOSOON.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aunt Bessie's Pork Chitterlings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aunt Bessie's Pork Chitterlings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:180:11F0:A1F5:62DB:9D7F:C96B (talk) 15:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Aunt Bessie's Chitterlings"

Aunt Bessie's Chitterlings, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. . Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 17:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CSaaS

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CSaaS, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://esgsuccess.com/what-we-do-csaas/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Refspam and paid editing

You've been adding refspam to articles since January. Please stop. If you are being compensated to edit Wikipedia, or you have any other sort of conflict of interest, you must declare it. If you are being compensated, you are legally required to disclose that as a condition for having a Wikipedia account; see WP:PAID for more details. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Louise Elisabeth Robertson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louise Elisabeth Robertson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Elisabeth Robertson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]