User Talk:Freedoxm

User page User talk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Estonia–Syria relations has been accepted

Estonia–Syria relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Ratnahastin (talk) 02:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

A Reverted Edit of Mine

Hey, I'm here to talk about an edit of mine that you reverted in Pooh's Heffalump Movie due to lack of a source. It was about the sentence, "Featuring characters from A. A. Milne's Winnie-the-Pooh stories, the film is the fourth theatrical animated film in Disney's Winnie the Pooh franchise and Disneytoon Studios' sixth adaptation of Winnie the Pooh stories, following Pooh's Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin (1997), Seasons of Giving (1999), The Tigger Movie (2000), A Very Merry Pooh Year (2002), Piglet's Big Movie (2003), and Springtime with Roo (2004)". I changed the word 'sixth' to 'seventh' in my edit. I didn't think a source was needed for this change because the number of Winnie the Pooh movies by DisneyToon Studios listed was six; first is Pooh's Grand Adventure, second is Seasons of Giving, third is The Tigger Movie, fourth is A Very Merry Pooh Year, fifth is Piglet's Big Movie, and sixth is Springtime with Roo. After that, we have Pooh's Heffalump Movie, making a total of seven, so a source isn't needed in this case, just some observation. Anyway, I just wanted to clear this up and I assure you that I bear no ill will to any misunderstanding. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:F9D5:A67:D333:4618 (talk) 06:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Alright, sorry about my misunderstanding. I'll revert it now, thanks for reminding me. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 06:25, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nauvoo Pageant (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ktkvtsh were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nauvoo Pageant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Freedoxm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

@Ktkvtsh: I already know that as three submissions I requested were accepted, but thanks for reminding me! 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Ok. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Edit Rejection

Hello and thank you for reviewing my edits I made to John Scott page. I have familiarized myself with the Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines regarding contributing as well as the Neutral point of view guidelines. That's why I made the edits.

The edit I made was to remove the dramatic language and replace it for a more neutral and factual tone. It simply indicates that something is receiving more focus or interest from people, without implying too much about the nature of the attention or its impact. Using the phrase "taking the ice hockey world by storm" is a hyperbolic expression which doesn’t fit with Wikipedia’s Neutral point of view guidelines.

Can you please approve my changes or at least explain more about why you feel the hyperbolic expression is necessary in this particular case? JazzyOxygen (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello @JazzyOxygen, thank you for your section over here. I reverted your edit because I don't think that taking the ice hockey world by storm is not neutral, and that replacing it with gaining attention also makes the article a little bit less-tuned. However, you are correct- what you did was also neutral. As a result, I have re-reviewed your edit, and it is now accepted. Please keep in mind that I have a policy here at my talk page that if I have started a discussion on your talk page, don't move it here for organizing reasons (so that it's more easily readable & in one place. If you want to feel free to familiarize yourself at the notice at the top of the talk page). Feel free to reply at your talk page where I notified you about your edit. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 23:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Got it. Thank you! JazzyOxygen (talk) 23:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

No problem. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 00:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)