User talk:Dogcow

/Archive1

Excel Saga 19

I own the volume too. The last couple have only been showing ISBN 13 on the information page, but each still has an ISBN 10. The ISBN 10 number for volume 19 is 4785929146. I thought that would be more appropriate since the rest of the page is in ISBN 10. Grapeofdeath 12:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kansai-ben

Great, thanks man. Just H 22:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yoghurt

I want to start out by saying I'm really sorry that this happened - I did my best to stop it, but sadly I have been overruled by 4 people who are obsessed with name changing (regardless of whether or not I agree with them), and there is a new debate on the Yoghurt talk page about the move - I just felt it would be best if most people who had voted in the past knew about this.daniel folsom 00:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gits-ssc.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gits-ssc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 15:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rainier.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rainier.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of 攻殻 on Talk:Ghost in the Shell

Hi. I just recently saw Innocence and Episodes 3 & 4 of GitS:SAC (and got hooked!) and added the pages here to my watchlist. I noticed your question about the translation of kōkaku from back in April and provided an answer there. Hope it helps! --SandChigger 16:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ffx2-fanime2005.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ffx2-fanime2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fma-fanime2005.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fma-fanime2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 12:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Modification on population of Meguro, Tokyo

The new population figures inserted by me were taken from the official website. I think there are something inconsistent in the official figure. --Wrightbus (talk) 11:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is now fixed because I just ignored in counting foreigners into total population. --Wrightbus (talk) 17:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That, my friend, is a GRAWP-sock.

He bombs us every few days. HalfShadow 03:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Spagetti Monster

There's a discussion on commons about the FSM pictures, you helped to aquire. Perhaps you want to join--Yamavu (talk) 21:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jupiter (mythology)

Bark bark bark. Moo moo moo. Talk page. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 15:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Futanari

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Stillwaterising (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at WP:NOTCENSORED and I'm reading this clause "Obviously inappropriate content (such as an irrelevant link to a shock site, or clear vandalism) is usually removed quickly. Content that is judged to violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, or that violates other Wikipedia policies (especially neutral point of view) or the laws of the U.S. state of Florida where Wikipedia's servers are hosted, will also be removed." This policy actually supports removal. - Stillwaterising (talk) 03:09, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vari-Lite

In response to comments at the top of the Vari-Lite page and in its Revision History...

I registered to edit the Vari-lite page, because it was (for once) a subject I actually knew something about, having worked extensively as a freelancer for the European and German offices from 1990 - 2002.

Please rest assured, that this account was NOT set up as a "single purpose" account for the editing of this article and that, should I happen to find other articles to which I can make verifiable contributions, then I will log in and do so.

Please also note that, although I tried to convey some of the excitement that surrounded the development of the company's earlier products (for they were exciting times indeed), the article was certainly not intended to be an advert for the brand and I believe that I made an honest attempt to add some balance, by noting some of the problems encountered in certain models; e.g. The poor output of the VL3, the unreliability of the VL4, problems in Europe with the C3 dimmer module, the toxicity of the material used in the VL5 Arc liquid lens and overall problems with the VL7, which led to its effective commercial failure and early withdrawal by many distributors and rental partners. I also pointed out in the final section, that the company's products were not based on wholly new ideas and that other, similar systems were under development at the same time.

There were a couple of other, darker aspects of the company's history that I could have included; such as the allegations that the company was deliberately overvalued by its management for its NASDAQ floatation and the (at the time) notorious "Vari-lite Attitude"; but these are largely anecdotal and difficult to research / verify from where I am today - so I left them out.

I was aware, as I first-time contributor, that there might be a some issues with what I had written and that my knowledge of the subject was incomplete; but did my best to add as many sources as possible. I also made a post on the Lightnetwork forums, inviting other lighting industry professionals to correct and contribute to this article; but sadly nobody has come forward so far.

I hope that what I've written will inspire others to improve and complete the article, in line with the high standards set by Wikipedia and look forward to reading their contributions.

Best Regards, Tex Arcana (talk) 09:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Tex Arcana[reply]

Operation Payback

Hi. Do you have a source for this edit? Not sure if it belongs there --Neo139 (talk) 17:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Neo139 (talk) 20:04, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Horihone Saizō for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Horihone Saizō, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horihone Saizō until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Farix (t | c) 17:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ladytron

Thank you for adding the copypaste tag (and providing the source too!) on that article. I realised that the content in the biography section was copied from http://www.amazon.com/Ladytron/e/B000APIJ1C and I've removed it. Minima c (talk) 08:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:FAR and galleries

Actually, there have been two requests at Japan's FAR that the gallery be removed. You're welcome to discuss there if you believe it should be retained. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 13:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2

Hi. When you recently edited Schmaltz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chandler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dogcow. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dogcow. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dogcow. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dogcow. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kerorofig.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kerorofig.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 04:20, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaori Moriwaka

The article Kaori Moriwaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unref blp

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]