User talk:DecrepitlyOnward
Welcome!
Hello, DecrepitlyOnward, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 01:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:23, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 2
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
All I can say for the moment is WOW!!! Have been scanning, but looks impressive! Ceoil (talk) 07:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- I attest. Great job. – zmbro (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ceoil and zmbro, thank you so much. Especially you, zmbro–I've looked up to your expansions of the Bowie album's (who is one of my favorite artists). Again, thank you both. DecrepitlyOnward (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- (Just for the future's sake, zmbro, the duplicate citations were an artifact of using VisualEditor, and I'm not quite sure why as I'm not too familiar with how the template's and VisualEditor work but instead of duplicating the same citation it just showed up as using the same citation multiple times. I'll try to check everything in source from now on–it's not like I'm not familiar with source, it's just that I prefer the WYSIWYG feel of VE.) DecrepitlyOnward (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- All good I was the same way initially. I still use VE for some things but I find source editor much easier for the grand scheme of things. – zmbro (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- (Just for the future's sake, zmbro, the duplicate citations were an artifact of using VisualEditor, and I'm not quite sure why as I'm not too familiar with how the template's and VisualEditor work but instead of duplicating the same citation it just showed up as using the same citation multiple times. I'll try to check everything in source from now on–it's not like I'm not familiar with source, it's just that I prefer the WYSIWYG feel of VE.) DecrepitlyOnward (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ceoil and zmbro, thank you so much. Especially you, zmbro–I've looked up to your expansions of the Bowie album's (who is one of my favorite artists). Again, thank you both. DecrepitlyOnward (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Editing the GAN page...
[edit]Is generally futile, because Legobot will overwrite any changes you make. Luckily, you fixed the problem on the article talk page and Legobot picked that up. (t · c) buidhe 08:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah...to be fair, it was severely late in the night in my time, and I do faintly remember reading that Legobot overwrites any changes you make...my apologies. DecrepitlyOnward (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of White Light/White Heat
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article White Light/White Heat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zmbro -- Zmbro (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 2
[edit]The article Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 2 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Come Over When You're Sober, Pt. 2 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 23:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of White Light/White Heat
[edit]The article White Light/White Heat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:White Light/White Heat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zmbro -- Zmbro (talk) 00:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
WP:RX
[edit]Hi, I saw your request at RX for that massively-titled article :) but you removed it before I was able to respond. Do you still want it? SN54129 16:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- I reverted it because I found the sources elsewhere, so I realized that it was useless--thank you for reaching out though. DecrepitlyOnward (he/they, fine with any, use as you wish) (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Public Strain
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Public Strain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Public Strain
[edit]The article Public Strain you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Public Strain for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Public Strain
[edit]The article Public Strain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Public Strain for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Epidural blood patch
[edit]On 6 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Epidural blood patch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that observations of a car tire being repaired helped develop the epidural blood patch? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Epidural blood patch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Epidural blood patch), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Velvet Underground (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard Smith. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Hey nice job on developing the Public Strain article - I was pleasantly surprised to see it change suddenly into a much more informative article that a great album like Public Strain deserves. One might say that the article is no longer an eyesore. I EDIT NAKED (talk) 20:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC) |
The Velvet Underground (album)/GA1
[edit]Hi DecrepitlyOnward! The GA review for The Velvet Underground (album) is finished and is on hold There are two issues: confirmation of details in the main source used, and making sure that the lead and the main body match - see Talk:The Velvet Underground (album)/GA1 for details. SilkTork (talk) 12:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- The GA review has been closed as not listed. You may re-nominate the article if you wish at any time, provided the issues raised have been addressed. SilkTork (talk) 07:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)