User talk:Clare Nassanga

This is Clare Nassanga's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Clare Nassanga!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Omonuk (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interviews, what Omonuk has said or written or are affiliated with him are primary sources so cannot be used to establish notability and should only be used sparingly. Sources that do not mention Omonuk are not useful. Also, all the footnotes are bunched at the bottom but they need to placed next to claims they are supporting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Omonuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clare Nassanga! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Omonuk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Omonuk. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Omonuk (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Thank you for changing to the family name.

I see examples of WP:CITEKILL, such as "and more.[19][20][21][22][23][24]". Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each. More reference for a single point do not help.

Look at areas like "Omonuk has also spoken at various podcasts", which are only useful in establishing notability if the podcasts are about what he said by others, nit just that he spoke and what he said. Look at the prior review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Omonuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Omonuk (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Omonuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk • contribs 21:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Omonuk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Omonuk. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Omonuk (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Omonuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Clare Nassanga. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.
On Wikimedia Commons almost all of the pictures you have uploaded are being qeried. Some are obvious copyright violations, others require their licences to be resolved. That is being discussed there and will not be discussed here. It is a technical licencing matter.
Here, I am interested in the two that remain, which you declare to have been taken by you. Potentially, you asked Omanuk to pose for you; you also state on Commons that you have received material from Omanuk. Is Omanuk known to you, and thus do you have a conflict of interest, please? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

He is not known to me. I just saw the kind of work that he does and thought of making an article about him. I requested him to send me photos via email plus more relevant information that i needed to create the article. Clare Nassanga (talk) 10:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I affirm that I do not have any conflict of interest and its why i seek guidance. Is it prohibited to request for photos from the subject you are requesting the information from.

I also did not request for any payment from the subject. Do i also have to request for a payment. Clare Nassanga (talk) 10:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have stated clearly that you do not have a conflict of interest and are not compensated for your work. Thank you. That is all that is required under the rules 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting photographs is fine. However, they must be freely licenced by the copyright owner. That is unlikely to be the subject of the photo.

Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via c:COM:VRT

Without the correct licencing by the copyright owner, the pictures on Commons will be deleted. That needs to be discussed on Commons. Wikipedia is not concerned with Commons business 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Omonuk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Omonuk. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theroadislong,

I have tried to be neutral with the article Draft:Nicholas Omonuk and was hoping to hear from you if the language is abit neutral now. Kindly advice please. Clare Nassanga (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong will only notice this message if pinged. MediaWili software has many foibles and this is one of them. If you look at the structure of this message you will see how the ping is formed. Help:Notifications will tell you all you may wish to know. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Omonuk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Omonuk. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Omonuk (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Omonuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Omonuk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Omonuk. Thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Omonuk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Omonuk. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Omonuk (June 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SafariScribe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: N-O (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:N-O and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 04:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Omonuk (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CFA were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interviews do not count towards notability. Please don't WP:REFBOMB citations as it makes it less likely for your draft to be accepted. You don't need 8 citations after a single claim.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Omonuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 17:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Omonuk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Omonuk. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]