User talk:Catfish Jim and the soapdish/Archive 8
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I was hoping you might help with the photo of The Jealous Girlfriends. There is one photo in the infobox, which is fine. The other photo in the article not only has a watermark on it (that would need removing anyway) but my focus is the right hand part of the picture of Holly Miranda, who doesn't have a photo on her page. Can you slice it so we have a photo of her alone? That would be a big help. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Picts/Pictish stones
I just wanted to say that brochs (Jarlshof, Mousa and Clickhimin) are illustrated on the right location as in reality is the case in Scotland. Also: Carnac, Stonehenge, New Grange, Hadrian's Wall, Traprain Law (Votadini) on various locations, etc. The artist used his large library for that. I knew him personally. I thougt it to be a nice idea to mention that in the articles on Wikipedia. My books about the subject are accepted by the Royal Library. Richard Feachem, author of "Prehistoric Scotland", was, when I visited him in Wales, pleased with my book about this subject. When you don't want to change the text, it doesnot matter for me. It is up to you.Romeinsekeizer (talk) 13:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- The presence of a book in the Royal library (Koninklijke Bibliotheek?) doesn't give it any authority as a reliable source with regards to this subject. It's a book about a comic book character, and not a history textbook.
- I have a first edition of Feachem's book (1966). While I rate his opinion (in reliable sources), he died in 2005, aged 91. I imagine he was quite old when you visited him. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 14:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
I visited Richard Feachem (Dick) in 1999, 2000 and 2001 in Wales (Llandre= church in bottomland). Our last contact (on the phone) was in 2003. He was surprised to find Jarslhof, Mousa and Clickhimin (brochs, built by ancestors of the Picts, in Dutch comic books. Just as Hadrian's Wall, New Grange, Stonehenge, Carnac and Traprain Law. He was even more surprised to find the Pictish symbols in it, like crescent and V-rod. I gave him my book about this subject. I still think it is a pity not to mention that in Wikipedia (Picts/Pictish stones. The Royal Library doesnot accept all books. There is a selection. I have "Prehistoric Scotland"(1969 and reprints). I helped him with the 1992-edition. We were both archaeologists and good friends.12:59, 31 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romeinsekeizer (talk • contribs)
- It's an interesting story, but I still don't think it's an appropriate topic/source for a historical treatment of the Picts. You clearly have a strong opinion about it... perhaps you should start a discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medieval Scotland and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard to judge what the general consensus is. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
Picts, etc.
See number 5Romeinsekeizer (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Article "Pictish stones": see: www.google.com and write: congash stones and choose: highland council and you will find the same conclusion as I did some years ago.Romeinsekeizer (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Romilly Allen noted that they formed an entrance into an enclosure in 1891. [1] p427 Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:57, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your information. Success. I go on with my next book.Romeinsekeizer (talk) 16:39, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
-------^^^^^^^^-------
SAY WHAT???—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 513,830,878) 23:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Your back!
Welcome back. Would you like to resume mentoring me? I can get started patrolling pages.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 520,030,737) 12:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Cyberpower, I'm not "back" as such. I am not intending to spend any significant amount of time on Wikipedia in the foreseeable future, other than the occasional piece of content editing. You're doing well by yourself and probably don't need a mentor. Good luck. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 14:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Would you like me to complete the task of patrolling the pages anyway or should I just leave it?
P.S. At least you're here and editing. Better than being gone.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 520,101,058) 20:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Would you like me to complete the task of patrolling the pages anyway or should I just leave it?
- I think it would be a useful learning experience for you (which was the intention in the first place). Pay attention to what the closing admins do with your CSD nominations, whether their closing rationale (if they delete) matches your CSD category. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 11:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well, seeing how my BRFA was a complete and utter disaster, I'm taking a break for now.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 520,491,564) 22:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- I think it would be a useful learning experience for you (which was the intention in the first place). Pay attention to what the closing admins do with your CSD nominations, whether their closing rationale (if they delete) matches your CSD category. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 11:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
And yes, welcome back (kinda)! Bruvtakesover (T|C) 19:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
My brother!
Hey! Nice to see you! I was hoping you might do something for me? Someone was kind enough to give me a barnstar, (it's on my talk page) and I was hoping you could add it to my user page with the same format you already implemented there. Grateful for your help as always! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 02:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Done! Catfish Jim and the soapdish 11:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | ||
Thanks for appreciating my role in the Wikipedia and besting my discovery of wonderful photos by creating an awe-inspiring tiny fairy icon for my userpage Leahtwosaints (talk) 17:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks. I'm not sure who the other is who also edited my userpage. I'm not territorial or whatever, but one of the little stars partly obscures that little fairy image. Can you fix that and also add the new one to that row of boxes next to the infoboxes, too? I never told you this, but I think it's one of the most beautiful things I've seen on the Wikipedia, along with your kindness and support in so many ways. Please have a look again at the page when you get the chance. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 17:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Leah... I'm afraid I can't take credit for creating the fairy, although I did put it there. I think User:Bob_the_Wikipedian might be the creator. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 18:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- Either way, it's beautiful and all the work you have done for me stands as a testament to your kindness. I'll happily redo the barnstar for you-- if I gave you all the ones you deserve, it would cover your whole talk page, since you became both and outstanding Admin. and my hero! BTW, I found some interesting things for editors to put on their userpages here, Wikipedia:User page design center, though I suspect you may already be aware of it. xoxox --Leahtwosaints (talk) 11:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well, thank you Leah. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 12:27, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
Regarding deletion of page
Regarding deletion of Page R. H. Sankhala
Delete it if its as per the Wikipedia policies to delete it. What I know about notability is that notability of researcher is through his published works and as per my knowledge, Journals etc normally do not cite references of a research paper by a non-notable person. If these are the Wikipedia policies, delete it immediately. And if you are considering to do a discussion, firstly cite all the sources which were added by me and other people, as I fetched them with a lot of hard work. Prakashpanwar (talk) 17:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Scientific publications by themselves do not establish notability in the sense it is used in Wikipedia. Please have a read of WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. Sources have be reliable as per WP:RS and have to be about the subject itself in order to establish notability. Please limit further debate to the AFD page. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 18:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
SON..S?
Hi Catfish Jim and the soapdish,
What do the abbreviations mean at the top right of your talk page (S / O / N / S%), if I may ask? ..and this RFA, if I may raise a brow?
Sincerely,
Sam Smolders (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Sam, RFAs are requests for adminship, which is the process that established wikipedia editors go through to get administrator tools. The box at the top right is a summary of RFAs that are presently ongoing. S = number of editors who have stated that they support that particular request for adminship, O = oppose, N = neutral. I have that box on my talk page to alert me to RFAs. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 19:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Catfish Jim and the soapdish,
I was really curious and now I understand! ... or... at least I think I do. I have many more questions, but I'm sure they can wait many many... many months (or years), for that day that I have a dream about world domination learning more. Thank you for clarifying that.
Sincerely,
Sam Smolders (talk) 03:36, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ask away, Sam. I'll do my best to answer. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 08:12, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. When you recently edited Dundee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dundee High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for your support at my RfA. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- You'll do fine. Just keep going as you are and dabble with the tools from time to time... that way you won't accidentally delete Wikipedia. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 18:47, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. When you recently edited River South Esk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strathmore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
RfA
I'm considering RfA now, and you have participated in a discussion with me previously. [2], so I would invite you to participate in a discussion on my talk page now, before I make a final decision. Dennis Brown (talk) (contrib) 17:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
A cup of coffee for you!
for helpful, constructive imput in designing a Judo technique infobox — Jdcollins13 (talk) 13:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC) |
RFA help
Thanks for the RFA Help!
- Responding for the sake of archiving. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 14:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Sent you a wiki email, and also...
And also, can you set up that auto-archive bot thing to automatically archive my talk page? It would be very helpful! Don't forget to check your email too. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 09:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
It is beautiful!!
I love the new userpage!! If I could jump through this monitor, I'd plant at least one big SMOOCH on your forehead! One more question-- is there a way to make it obvious that the links that you and I placed to the page you created with the list of names of people whose photos I uploaded? I don't want the occasional surfer to think that tiny gallery I placed of a few especially nice pics to assume that's all I have provided. I was looking at all the little awards for articles brought to GA or FA status. It's ironic that on every article I worked upon to the same end, all have had their articles de-listed! Examples are Cat Stevens, Natalie Maines, and others. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 18:37, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- It's very nice and better organized. I think b/c I messed with it also, that a couple things were left out. See here from weeks ago-- it has a section with the blue tab that, when clicked, had my most-used editing tools. Also I had two self-created sandboxes which aren't the one generally displayed at the top of the pages. Have a look here, unless I am mistaken [3]. Last, that little gallery, I'd prefer to have the pictures in rows of four rather than five, if possible. Cam we fix these? Ir is nice.
Beatles infobox
There is a Straw Poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 02:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Re: Mahthu Uchitpe
Hi. I don't have a problem with downgrading the speedy to a PROD, but just wanted to point out that the part I thought made it obvious is actually here. (Specifically, "Another student Matt Uchitpe said his love of the video game game FIFA forced him to go to the library.") --Paul_012 (talk) 12:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Jim!
Thanks for your offer, I would be happy to learn anything you are willing to teach me. — GabeMc (talk) 01:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
Talkback
Message added 15:54, 4 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yasht101 15:54, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 06:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yasht101 06:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
My list
Please don't mind if I add your name to my hate listYasht101 05:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- You got me there... Catfish Jim and the soapdish 11:48, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
more requests for help
Hi- I wonder- can you set up the auto-archive talk thing on my talk page in Commons the way it is here in Wikipedia? It would be a relief. The other thing- I just noticed that on the GA-ranked article for James Blunt the second photo there still has a watermark that needs to be removed. I can't believe they missed it. Could you take it off, or do you know someone who would be willing to do it? (Damn if I don't need to meet some people with all that photoshop stuff that really are Commons workers!) Thanks so very much from your biggest fan! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 07:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
Vandalism continues
The 6 year long campaign continues. We need you to report back to WP:SCO and discuss this blatant breach of WP:VERIFY and WM:NPOV. --Mais oui! (talk) 08:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I'm going to have to duck out at this point as I've no time to commit to Wikipedia right now (unforeseen). I suggest you take up the discussion at User talk:Tim!#Removal of Scotland from country categories Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I hope it's OK to drop you a line via email? Let me know. Blessings, --Leahtwosaints (talk) 13:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
Sgt. Pepper straw poll
There is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 23:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Paul McCartney FAC
The Paul McCartney article has now been thoroughly copyedited top-to-bottom by numerous editors including User:Lfstevens, a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. If you can find the time in your busy schedule, please consider stopping by and taking a look, and hopefully, !voting. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 04:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- Featured content: Taking flight
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
The Signpost: 23 July 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics
- Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans
- Featured content: When is an island not an island?
- Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
- News and notes: FDC portal launched
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts