User talk:Brandmeister (old)

; Archives
	Archive I; Archive II; Archive III; Archive IV; Archive V; Archive VI; Archive VII; Archive VIII;

This user may have left Wikipedia. Brandmeister (old) has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Free work

Hi, I saw that you made an edit to Shroud of Turin. Could I talk you into doing more clean up on the Science section? My goal is to get the "junk tags" removed from the top after clean up. I can even suggest a 10% salary increase if you would help... just kidding. But your help will be really appreciated. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 21:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Valery Meladze

I have nominated Valery Meladze, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valery Meladze. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Guy (Help!) 18:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not inviting debates and reverts

Hi, First let me say thanks for your help on the shroud article. I wanted to tell you my opinion about how things sometimes turn into unnecessary debates in Wikipedia. It is a matter of tone more than anything. As an example, I know for sure that some people like D'Adamo but some think he is in a minority. If we position his ideas as "true" some day, someone who has just had 3 beers, starts reading the page, and says "that is nonsense" and not only deletes that but starts to view the entire page as biased and starts to rip apart even the parts that are balanced. Just yesterday, an angry IP started to type on the page that Max Frie was not accused on faking pollen samples, etc. And he made a mess of the paragraph. I changed that to read just slightly differently, so another IP will not come over and start the same debate.

I think we must remember that this is the MOST controversial artifact in history. Next month several thousand people will buy Joe Nickell's book. A few will read it, get all worked up, and if the ideas of Nickell are criticized too hard in the article those of them who have had one drink too many will start an unnecessary mess. So I will appreciate your help in remembering the tone of the sentences, just as the shroud is about to get displayed and people from both sides of the table will start to get emotional. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 23:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi there; noticed your edits to today's TFA; thanks for pitching in. Just one thing I should mention: per the above guideline, we should avoid linking terms whose meaning can be understood by most English readers; arguably, "voyeuristic" and "exhibitionist" fall into that category. (Plus, in this case, the terms appear within a quotation; links in quotes are generally frowned upon too.) Thanks again, Steve ^T • C 20:42, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think these relevant adjectives are "plain English words" per WP:MOSLINK. But thanks for dropping your stance anyway. Brand[t] 20:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Request for Help

Hi there Brandmeister :), I noticed your username on Translators Available Russian to English. I was wondering if you could help with updating Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the Russian Wikipedia? Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the English Wikipedia has been majorly revamped- particularly, its being treated as a BLP now, since no ones been able to find evidence of his death. I'm sorry to say I don't know any Russian, so I'd really appreciate your help in this :), although I understand if you don't have the time. Thanks in advance!Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 06:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will assist within the next few days, but will omit the currently unreliable section on his dissappearance. Brandmeister[t] 13:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, thanks for your help! Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 18:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've just finished the correction of Russian version, Риаз Ахмед Гоар Шахи. Brandmeister[t] 19:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, thanks! Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 22:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Christ in the Desert

On April 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christ in the Desert, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1994 Baku Metro bombings

On April 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1994 Baku Metro bombings, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 00:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re Merge

please see Thirty Mile Fire re merging Hugo999 (talk) 05:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1995 Baku Metro fire

On April 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1995 Baku Metro fire, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

request of translation for Mérida, Mérida, and Feria del Sol (Mérida) in Russian

Good evening to you from Italy, writes if kindly you could translate in Armenian the articles that I have signalled you, in change I will translate you an article of your liking in Italian and his/her present dialects on Wikipedia in attends him of one certain answer of yours I thank you in advance for the help that you will give me

Mérida in Russian there is alone I would like a little inprove but not possessing the keyboard in Cyrillic I don't know how to do... you could help me? thanks of heart.... this is your gift.... the Merideña for excellence in the World.. Stefania Fernandez... it also has Russian origins. thanks for everything...sorry my bad english♥--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 17:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now translated Feria del Sol — Ферия дель Соль, but the history is written in poor English, so I translated what I understood. Mérida, Mérida already has its page in Russian, Мерида (Венесуэла). Could you translate the Mayoralty of Baku please? Thanks. Brandmeister[t] 12:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

holy crap, huge copyvio

You added a huge amount of copyvio, still on Wikipedia three years later, here. Perhaps you should repair it. • Ling.Nut 04:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should be paraphrased, I hope to fix that soon. Brandmeister[t] 14:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shusha seal

Here you go, http://wapedia.mobi/ru/%D0%A8%D1%83%D1%88%D0%B0. If its possible, could you please add the reference --NovaSkola (talk) 23:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Centurion poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Centurion poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:28, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 09:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Fimmvörðuháls fracture

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Fimmvorduhals second fissure 2010 04 02.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 03:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Massachusetts House of Representatives

Коллега, пожалуйста, не занимайтесь проталкиванием левых сайтов в качестве АИ, а то я вынужден буду ставить вопрос о Вашей блокировке за заведомо деструктивные действия. Divot (talk) 16:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Я Вам представил оригинальное изображение документа с подписью, что и требовалось доказать. Brandmeister[t] 17:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Вы мне представили какую-то картинку, загруженную непонятно кем на неавторитетный сайт. Вы прекрасно знаете, что это не АИ, не первый день в проекте. Тем более, что официальный сайт Массачусетса хранит полное молчание. Поскольку у меня нет сомнений, что Вы прекрасно понимаете что делаете, я убедительно прошу Вас не повторять подобных действий. С уважением. Divot (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ліонкінг arbitration enforcement thread

I've closed this complaint as inactionable, as Ліонкінг has never been placed on notice of the Armenia sanctions. But note that I have now placed him on notice. Thanks anyway for brining the matter to light. AGK 23:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gobustan Rome.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gobustan Rome.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rihanna-Breakin' Dishes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rihanna-Breakin' Dishes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Discussion

See if you would like to comment this --Hittit (talk) 20:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Discussion

See if you would like to comment the merge of this article. --Hittit (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings referring to your comment, the article Genocide of Ottoman Turks and Muslims was nominated for deletion by a group of editors, almost immediately, as the article was created. The AfD outcome did not support deletion and the same people immediately voted among them selves to remove it from Wikipedia main space by placing a merge tag the on the same day of the AfD result I renamed the article to Persecution of Ottoman Muslims and Turks 1821-1922 due to admin proposal and as a matter of courtesy for those who what issues with the article name. You are vey much welcome to participate in improving the article Persecution of Ottoman Muslims and Turks 1821-1922, however first we need to seek the removal of the merge tag. Your discussion at the article talk page is valuable, thank you. --Hittit (talk) 03:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning!

Hi, be careful, you are very quick in reverting others. Ionidasz (talk) 15:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Drip-Drop

Hey. Can U upload this to commons? --Interfase (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, we can't upload copyrighted images there. Do it locally. Brandmeister[t] 14:06, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Иск в АК

Иск 589. Divot (talk) 18:18, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1492 light sighting

On June 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1492 light sighting, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting if you know

Are you aware, that jumping into editing after a block was lifted from an article is count to be a pure pattern of edit-warring and tendentious editing? If not, then mind this for your own good in the future. Aregakn (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such a policy, see WP:BOLD and WP:IAR instead. Brandmeister[t] 14:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see me for a fool. Read the WP:DE again, because it was the second time you did it and it may be the last time. Let this be more official now. And you better not make the articles battlegrounds aymore and go to talk-pages. You seem to be a very experienced editor for me to be playing with you as if you are a newb. Aregakn (talk) 21:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mind AGF. Since when one edit after protection expiry is disruptive editing or editwarring? Brandmeister[t] 14:29, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The good faith in you is totally compromised with your conspiracy with many others leave alone the current conduct of yours on en.wiki. Now let this be an official warning, that the way you involved at least in several AA2 articles is a tendentious editing. It is on your discretion to read or not WP:TD to see since when engagement in edit warring right after unblock is tendentious editing.

Please engage in talks, get to the point and reach consensus before editing. And enough of claiming "per-talk" before the talk is over. Aregakn (talk) 01:35, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2 results

Hi Brandmeister (old), because you contributed to FPC's recent review, I'm letting you know that the results of the poll have been posted. We appreciate your contributions to the first stage and hope you take part in this next step, here, to move towards implementing several changes to the process. Regards, Maedin\^talk 18:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you vandalising?

Why are you deleting referenced information from the article Karabakh khanate? IsmailAhmedov (talk) 21:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Please be informed about an AE case against you. Regards Aregakn (talk) 11:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. M D Potter. Any comments? 20:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brandmeister → User:Nightbolt

Restarting discussion: Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nightbolt (talk) 11:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&oldid=368249856 there was this uncontroversial-type move request:
" User:Brandmeister → User:Nightbolt (move) — With talk, repeated log-in failure Nightbolt (talk) 11:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)"[reply]
Discussion copied from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive619#User:Brandmeister move request:
- But a look at User talk:Brandmeister gets me wondering if this move request better be looked at first. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's an odd request. A userpage of a user with 12k edits to a user with only 5 edits? I think Brandmeister's account has been compromised, but I'm not sure. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 00:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There is indeed a claim that the account is compromised, see WP:AE#Brandmeister. I don't think that the page should be moved until that is resolved. Sandstein 12:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's me, checkuser can verify that. I left my IP at AE and consulted Stifle about possible password theft. The Help section suggests moving in such cases. I would like the contribs reassignment to be done, thanks in advance. NIGHTBOLT t 16:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Continued discussion

"There is indeed a claim that the account is compromised": it is now at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive64#Brandmeister; there, click on "[show]" to make that discussion's text show. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The account (here on enwiki) almost certainly was hijacked, so he claimed at Russian Wikipedia too [1], where he connected this with an Armenian IP address. Note that Brandmeister is one of the users who were involved in the so-called Azerbaijani mailing list of Russian Wikipedia users, a list that was hacked some time ago. So not really surprising. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog | woof! 09:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Apocalypse Code poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Apocalypse Code poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Blackfoot war bonnet.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Blackfoot war bonnet.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:24, 25 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DD822.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DD822.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Abakan Coat of arms.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Abakan Coat of arms.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Max Bogdanovich.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Max Bogdanovich.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Portrait of Maurice of Nassau

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Michiel Jansz van Mierevelt - Maurits prins van Oranje-edit 1.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 05:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For your edit. Makeemlighter (talk) 05:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies ^talk 21:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Japanese military paraphernalia

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Old Japanese military paraphernalia.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Jujutacular ^talk 01:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Brandmeister,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Angel from The Song of Bethlehem.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 25, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-12-25. howcheng {chat} 10:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CathBaku.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:CathBaku.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Koenigsegg CC - 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Koenigsegg CC - 1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Maxim Gorkiy.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Maxim Gorkiy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Transheya.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Transheya.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Izabella Bavarskaya.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Izabella Bavarskaya.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerb Arbata.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gerb Arbata.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christoph Semke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christoph Semke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christoph Semke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 17:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Israfil.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Israfil.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Brandmeister (old)}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ivan Petrov.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Ivan Petrov.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Y u no be Russavia ^{ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)} 03:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sex and Pornography Day

A tag has been placed on Sex and Pornography Day, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non-notable event, seems to fit under A7

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SpyroSpeedruns (talk) 01:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sex and Pornography Day

The article Sex and Pornography Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable event.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kulik.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kulik.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Buta Palace logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Buta Palace logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rachel as Dina.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rachel as Dina.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:WJLevada.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WJLevada.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tad Sendzimir.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tad Sendzimir.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sarawak $.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sarawak $.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strategic Rocket Forces Russia logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Strategic Rocket Forces Russia logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 16:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthäus Hetzenauer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthäus Hetzenauer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthäus Hetzenauer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 16:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wisła Płock.png.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wisła Płock.png.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:24, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of We własnej osobie

The article We własnej osobie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. Has been without sources since October 2006, and after a good faith search I can't locate any substantial coverage of this album in any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ManicSpider (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:We własnej osobie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We własnej osobie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of funerals

The article List of funerals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot make heads or tails of what this list accomplishes or why it's necessary. Notability of most of these entries are questionable, remaining ones may be better served as a category.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thargor Orlando (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of funerals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of funerals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of funerals until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thargor Orlando (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GUAM logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GUAM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of World History. Bank Imperial

The article World History. Bank Imperial has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability - has only won minor awards from non-notable organizations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edward321 (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Operation Wotan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Wotan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Wotan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 04:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Babayevsky (company)

The article Babayevsky (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krasny Oktyabr Open Joint-Stock Company

The article Krasny Oktyabr Open Joint-Stock Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jenaveve Jolie

The article Jenaveve Jolie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations. Negligible reliably/independently sourced biographical content. Unbilled and uncredited roles for characters like "Female Inmate" and "Woman in Bed" fall far, far short of satisfying notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikolai Noskov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikolai Noskov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolai Noskov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 23:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jenaveve Jolie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jenaveve Jolie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenaveve Jolie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:06, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Ostvolk Medal has been nominated for discussion

Category:Recipients of the Ostvolk Medal, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Xamovniki.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Xamovniki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Komsomol 1930 poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Komsomol 1930 poster.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Presnya.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Presnya.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sovetski gerb Baku.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Sovetski gerb Baku.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shootdown listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shootdown. Since you had some involvement with the Shootdown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The History of the Galaxy

Template:The History of the Galaxy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 14:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Zhmodikov

The article Alexander Zhmodikov has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Harrias ^talk 08:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sie12.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sie12.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tycho Brahe portrait.jpg

The file File:Tycho Brahe portrait.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Coats of arms of the republics of Russia

Template:Coats of arms of the republics of Russia has been nominated for merging with Template:Coats of arms of the autonomous okrugs of Russia. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 09:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Nobel oil fields, 1900s.jpg

The file File:Nobel oil fields, 1900s.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Charles II coat of arms.jpg

The file File:Charles II coat of arms.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander Zhmodikov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Zhmodikov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Zhmodikov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Subhuman (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subhuman (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhuman (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keymaker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keymaker, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keymaker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:T. Kirven and S. J. Love.jpg

The file File:T. Kirven and S. J. Love.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, lower-quality crop of File:"First Negro Marines decorated by the famed Second Marine Division somewhere in the Pacific (left to right) Staff Sgt Ti - NARA - 535872.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cruel Restaurant .jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cruel Restaurant .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wisła Płock logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wisła Płock logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Baku raions

Template:Baku raions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 20:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Night wets.jpg

The file File:Night wets.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

low quality and unused

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Barbara Krafft. Mozart, full.jpg

The file File:Barbara Krafft. Mozart, full.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Low quality. Superseded by File:Wolfgang-amadeus-mozart 1.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Carolus I Angliae.jpg

The file File:Carolus I Angliae.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by File:Anthony van Dyck - Charles I (1600-49) with M. de St Antoine - Google Art Project.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 11:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emblem of Jerusalem for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emblem of Jerusalem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emblem of Jerusalem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iskandar323 (talk) 06:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Charles II coat of arms.jpg

The file File:Charles II coat of arms.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by File:Coat of Arms of King Charles II.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:09, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GEO logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GEO logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Firefighters' Day

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Firefighters' Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from samoaglobalnews.com/today-in-history-4-may-1999-celebration-of-international-firefighters-day. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 July 31 § Treasure troves by country

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 July 31 § Treasure troves by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. + Qwerfjkl talk 17:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 8 § Category:Explorers by ethnicity

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 8 § Category:Explorers by ethnicity on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow • talk 21:23, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarawak $.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarawak $.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Seawolf35 ^T--C 20:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]