User talk:Aronanki

Welcome!

Hello, Aronanki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 1955 African Cup of Nations, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 15:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1955 African Cup of Nations

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as 1955 African Cup of Nations, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the word "alleged" is deprecated

See MOS:ALLEGED. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, I'm Jaellee. Your recent edit(s) to the page Bundesliga appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 17:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Islamic feminism without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 18:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting article expansion support

Greetings,

Requesting you to visit articles Islamic advice literature and Draft:Aurats (word) and help expand the articles if topics interest you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 03:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Capitals00 (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Capitals00 (talk) 15:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We don't use genetic studies for any caste pages. You have totally missed the discussions right on talk page[1][2] that confirm this long standing fact. Capitals00 (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I respect Wikipedia consensus, but I must say I do not agree with this at all. You are strongly misleading people , intentionally or uninentionally, by leaving out this important context. If Wikipedia continues like this, I may have to encourage against using the site. Aronanki (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are thousands of caste pages on Wikipedia and the Wikipedia community has agreed that genetic studies can have too many interpretations and are prone to misrepresentation. That's why we don't use them. Capitals00 (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine, I do still think we should communicate somehow that rigid caste endogamy was the state of affairs in India long before the British arrived. Aronanki (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question is what constitutes Caste {still being debated academically} ? Historically many societies have had endogamy so it can not be seen as exclusive feature of caste. Another thing is endogamy has even longer history among tribes compared to caste even if we limit ourselves to subcontinent.

Population Differentiation of Southern Indian Male Lineages Correlates with Agricultural Expansions Predating the Caste System

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050269

Consider the sociological debate abt. status & how it affected understanding regarding caste and how debate is still going on after all this time.

Refer to papers -

Caste Groups Simply, Indian Status Groups

https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-bja10074

Caste and two types of status. Comparing Dumont and Weber for studies of caste today

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09584935.2023.2169904?src= Deep007 bond007 (talk) 01:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Question is what constitutes Caste {still being debated academically} ? Historically many societies have had endogamy so it can not be seen as exclusive feature of caste."

Most societies had some degree of class endogamy, yes, "caste" however generally refers to particularly rigid social hierarchies characterized by a near complete lack of mixing and social mobility such as the racial dynamics of the American South under Jim Crow or the varna-jati system historically present in India.

"Another thing is endogamy has even longer history among tribes compared to caste even if we limit ourselves to subcontinent."

Yes, and some (myself included) would argue that these tribes were/are de facto castes as well and not all that dissimilar in terms of their social identity formation from other jati groups in India. Aronanki (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Women in Islam, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Remember: Wikipedia is not censored. GenoV84 (talk) 12:04, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic feminism

Hi Aronanki! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Islamic feminism several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Islamic feminism, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 23:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly alert

This is part of similar friendly alerts issued by me to few other editors too and be assured you are not being singled out.

As such I respect you for being fairly aware in good many WP policies . This is not to say you have broken any guidelines relating WP:CTOP and WP:CT/BLP, WP:CT/GG but remaining alerted may help to avoid heat of moment editing situations.

Wish you happy editing and cheers.

-- Bookku (talk) 09:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aronanki. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]