Jump to content

User talk:65.78.144.196

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sunrise has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Geoff Who, me? 03:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Survival: The Ultimate Challenge, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:ClueBot Commons. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 07:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to Help talk:Edit summary. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Dreadstar 08:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, you're right, it was the wrong template - I've fixed it. Dreadstar 08:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to Help talk:Edit summary. Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

65.78.144.196 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That guy was being an asshole. If a person accuses me of something, aren't I allowed to argue against it? Fuck. You guys are all treating me like shit just because I'm new. That's depressing. If you're really gonna play like that, I guess I can refrain from editing this thing, and only read it, but man... The elitism on here is just disgusting.

Decline reason:

You should read our guide to appealing blocks before making an unblock request. You apparently had not done so. NJA (t/c) 09:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Am I unblocked yet?

[edit]

I think I am, but I don't feel like editing crap to test...

Ah well, I'll figure out later. 65.78.144.196 (talk) 05:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]