User talk:24.251.29.163

May 2016

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Huell Howser. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – S. Rich (talk) 15:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Drew Massey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Strawberry4Ever (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Drew Massey, you may be blocked from editing. Strawberry4Ever (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Garry Shandling, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Strawberry4Ever (talk) 11:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your edits on zh-min-nan

Hello,

Thank you for your interest in creating articles here. However the articles are too short and the content needs to be expanded.

Let me introduce to you this translation tool which can translate chinese articles into the Southern Min language. It is fairly accurate so you can use the tool to create new articles. Please ensure that your new articles content more content and words.

Thank you for your understanding. --A-eng (talk) 08:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Hoodwinked edit reverted

Hi again. I'm sorry to say that I've had to revert your edits to Hoodwinked!, as you haven't been leaving any edit summaries, and most of your changes appear to be unnecessary. If you want to continue making contributions to the article, you may do so, but please explain, either in edit summaries or on the article's talk page, what changes are being made and why. Thanks! :) --Jpcase (talk) 02:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Religious identification

Please don't indicate in an article that someone identifies with a religion if you don't provide a reliable source, as you did on John de Lancie. That is a violation of WP:BLP, one of the most important policies on Wikipedia. Sundayclose (talk) 02:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at John de Lancie, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 02:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---