User:Thingg/dashboard
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- Ashley Rokovun (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 125.165.153.182 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:59, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 125.165.153.182 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:55, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:d08:e0:ca46:961:89fe:d78:55f0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:00, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 116.255.53.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 112.208.186.53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Ronnie Alonte was changed by 112.208.186.53 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870829 on 2025-02-22T07:05:45+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 07:05, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 213.109.192.23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:19, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:281:cc81:4640:1855:c409:7a85:24bb (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 172 five times in the last 5 minutes (Section blanking, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 125.165.153.182 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1340 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user changing times, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:44, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 46.183.108.69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 125.165.153.182 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 85.206.231.133 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Geek Squad was changed by 85.206.231.133 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888344 on 2025-02-22T11:25:47+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 11:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 178.122.213.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:51, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 2800:300:6F54:9260:E9F3:CC7C:268:C5A5 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – BLP vandalism, disruptive edits, including: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Adakiko (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 112.208.186.53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – bizzare plot edits to Petrang Kabayo, including: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Adakiko (talk) 06:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Jannatul Islam jibon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Hijacking articles for self promotion. See Special:AbuseLog/40052399. Agent 007 (talk) 11:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Jildebario (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Hijacking articles for vandalism & self promotion. See Special:AbuseLog/40050501. Agent 007 (talk) 11:17, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2A05:BB80:38:2991:E1B6:B630:9161:A53C (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – disruptive editing, including: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Adakiko (talk) 12:01, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 4 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Other candidates | 11 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 31 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Random Username Generator (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Septyuu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "(ltd|pty)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:00, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 00:00, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- It's likely a false positive. It sounds like "Except you." Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:49, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Entertainment Family (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Scientologyabuses (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "abuse" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- ZOGER OFFICIAL (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Despicableme400 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "despicable" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- CarlosPratesUnofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Whirlpool 36 in. 24.6 Cu. Ft Side-by-Side Refrigerator (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Skibididopdop~commonswiki 4 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Monsters University (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Максон6 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Sportsagencybrazil (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Creativeai360 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Promoting (https://creativeaicontent.com/) in articles. See [1] and [2]. Agent 007 (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- BookLoversZone (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Promoting (https://bookloverszone.com/) in articles. See Special:AbuseLog/40053034. Agent 007 (talk) 11:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Recipesriley (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Promoting (https://recipesriley.blogspot.com) in articles only. See Special:AbuseLog/40041652. Agent 007 (talk) 11:26, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- VSBCETC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Shellwood (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Mount Sales (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Shellwood (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- HEARTParty (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (heartparty.com.au), see Special:Diff/1277060310. Annh07 (talk) 11:59, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary protection: Edit war amongst three or more registered users. Adakiko (talk) 05:44, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism Opm581 (talk) 04:38, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:33, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edits by multiple IPs appear intent on promoting one person. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unreferenced edits from IP users, plus copying/pasting already posted references and falsely masking them as references. Hotwiki (talk) 06:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent rash by IPs changing middle name to nonsense. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hate speech target. Skywatcher68 (talk) 06:43, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Riyansuhairi (talk · contribs).- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Parksfan1955 (talk) 08:04, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:49, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 6 IP edit reverts in a row. Changing IP addresses. IgelRM (talk) 08:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:44, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring between IPs regarding the order of actors' names in credits; this is the same issue that led to the previous protection on this page. High level of IP vandalism. (213.109.192.23 (talk) 08:19, 22 February 2025 (UTC))
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and general unconstructive editing. AsaQuathern (talk) 08:18, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- List of black-and-white films that have been colorized (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Parksfan1955 (talk) 10:18, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Because of the lingering ethnic and religious tension in the country and in the diaspora, unsourced edits are pile up to an extent where it gets hard to control what is right and sourced and what is not. SdHb (talk) 11:43, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:57, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There's been several IP edits to this page adding unreferenced information. They are possibly a former member of the band, or in some way connected, as they seem to be adding personal details about lineup changes. I've reverted these twice already, but they keep coming back with a new IP address and adding it all back in. Requesting Pending changes protection to hopefully force this person to create an account and engage in some discussion about referencing on Wikipedia etc. Jimmyjrg (talk) 11:52, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jolielover♥talk 12:05, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:17, 22 February 2025 (UTC) |
| 21 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:00, 22 February 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [3]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- @C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Walco1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Иованъ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. About to publish many geography stubs (manually written, differing in content, not violating MASSCREATE - see Ledenice and Zapeć for examples). Articles like Cirsium greimleri, First Vrbnik Breviary, Petər Klepəc and Veternica are more representative of my work, though. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- GanzKnusper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- AlphaBetaGamma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- AmateurHi$torian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Jannatulbaqi: Thanks for considering me :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Good quality and appropriately sourced articles. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Endrabcwizart (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request Autopatrolled permissions. I have experience in creating and editing articles, particularly in Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) and good understand on notability guidelines. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including verifiability, neutrality, and reliable sourcing. I am committed to continuous learning and will ensure that any pages I create meet Wikipedia's standards. I will handle this permission responsibly and always strive to improve my contributions.Thank you for considering my request. Endrabcwizart (talk) 18:47, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Endrabcwizart: One of your creations was recently deleted at AfD for notability concerns, and it seems Binay Shah has been tagged for similar reasons. I also looked through Nitin Chand, and in addition to the overall poor formatting, contains this sentence: "With over a decade of active work, Chand has successfully created more than 150 music videos and commercials, showcasing his expertise in the industry", which violates the neutral point of view policy. At the moment, it seems your work will continue to benefit from review from new pages patrol.If you're looking for resources to help you improve, make sure you're familiar with the content policies, and the Manual of Style would be good to start incorporating as well. It's also important to note that even otherwise reputable news organizations in the Indian subcontinent have a track record of publishing paid promotion disguised as real coverage. These are not reliable and should not be cited. For example, this source in Prakash Subedi (lyricist) is one. The Teahouse has experienced editors who can help you out if you need it, and feel free to reach out on my talk page if you have any questions about my message. Good luck! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:36, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done, per above. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- RedactedHumanoid66 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
This is a (new) alt account of User:RedactedHumanoid, and has been created with the sole purpose to edit articles that I do not want to edit on my main account (NSFW articles, etc). Most of these articles are semi-protected, so I am requesting confirmed rights so I can edit those pages. RedactedHumanoid66 (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- @RedactedHumanoid: Could you please comment here from your main account as well? jlwoodwa (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sure. I can confirm that this is an alt account of mine, and that it's main purpose is what it stated. I honestly don't really know what else to say given that my alt already said what I think needs to be said. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 02:54, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Done stwalkerster (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- ScrabbleTiles (Public) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: I would like confirmed rights so that I can make edits on this account, used on public computers. I am the user ScrabbleTiles. ScrabbleTiles (Public) (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- I confirm this is my account. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 21:28, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Done * Pppery * it has begun... 22:43, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Ali Beary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)- @Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ahecht just curious, would you object to a grant here? If so this should be declined for now. Otherwise I'd consider granting since PCR is a pretty newbie-friendly permission. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Done * Pppery * it has begun... 22:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- MPian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia and focused on editing articles, reviewing new pages & combating vandalism. I am requesting for PCR right to speeding up the review process for pending changes. I am familiar with key Wikipedia content policies, including vandalism, biographies of living persons (BLP), neutral point of view (NPOV), verifiability, and copyright compliance. I've also been involved in patrolling recent changes, where I use Twinkle tool to revert vandalism. With my experience and understanding of these policies, I believe that I can effectively contribute to reviewing pending changes. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 20:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Done * Pppery * it has begun... 22:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Vellutis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 18:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thorn6130 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Squawk7700 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I patrol recent changes, mainly for vandalism, but I also get in contact with a lot of pending changes and like to help. I am familiar with the related policies. Squawk7700 (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sackiii (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting reviewer rights to help improve the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia articles, particularly in areas related to Pakistan and some notable international articles like television shows and international cricket. I also created a page Kana Yaari directly, which is a result of my performances on Wikipedia. I have gained experience through consistent and constructive editing, and I am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies, including neutral point of view, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. I aim to assist in maintaining the integrity of semi-protected pages and contribute to the efficient review of pending changes. Currently I'm a auto confirmed user rights. Sackiii (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had an account for 3 days. — MusikBot talk 20:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not done You seem to have no idea what you are requesting. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- HKLionel (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I routinely edit (especially recently) and have a reasonable editing history for which a track record can be established (see my userpage). I have read WP:VD, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:V, WP:!, WP:C and the guideline on the reviewing process for RPC. HKLionel (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- AgerJoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to help in Reviewing pending changes as I'm familiar with all the policies and guidelines for RPC and I'm doing constructive edit regularly. AgerJoy talk 07:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Xiphoid Vigour (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting rights to intervene against vandalism. I've been patrolling recent changes & have reviewed a lot of changes. I was declined last time as my account was new. I'm familiar with all the policies of vandalism and pending changes. Regards, Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 09:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 09:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- ScrabbleTiles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I edit Wikipedia quite frequently, particularly fighting against vandalism and I think that if I had this right, it would enable me to be a more helpful and better user. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- QalasQalas (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- @QalasQalas: what would you use rollback for? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- AntiVandalism as you see this Edit and Edit2 new users vandlized account which why i need roll thanks. QalasQalas (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- PRRfan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. I've recently come across several instances where rollbacking would be faster than manually reverting nonconstructive consecutive edits. I don't patrol Recent Changes, but I am quite active and have more than 3,100 pages on my Watchlist. Thanks for your consideration. PRRfan (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Lemonademan22 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've previously requested rollback twice but I'm here a third time to ask once again. I think rollback would be much easier in loads of situations. I patrol certain pages and help maintain others, and I've had the experience of needing to revert numerous edits but since I do not have the rollback feature I have had to manually revert the changes, which take up too much time and are quit time consuming, not to mention tedious. So I am here once again to request rollback in order to revert vandalism, unconstructive edits or misinformation as well as other tid bits. Lemonademan22 (talk | contribs) 23:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Coining (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
There have been too many times when multiple rounds of improper edits/vandalism on pages I follow have required individual reversions, so having the rollback permission would be useful. Coining (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- SportscarFan2004 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I mainly edit on pages related to sportscar racing, where unregistered users often edit multiple small things (often going against the page consensus at the time) in the span of a few minutes. This role would be particularly useful to be able to rollback these edits at once. I check my watchlist multiple times a day and I am quite active in general. Thanks for your time. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 09:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oostpulus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I request rollback rights. I need rollback rights to more conveniently eliminate vandalism in English wiki. In addition, I have rollback rights on Russian wiki and I am also actively eliminating cross-wiki vandalism. I have read the rollback policy and am ready to follow it. Oostpulus (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
DYK
[edit]| Count of DYK Hooks | ||
| Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
|---|---|---|
| December 25 | 1 | |
| December 27 | ||
| December 28 | 1 | |
| January 5 | 1 | |
| January 6 | 2 | |
| January 8 | 2 | 1 |
| January 9 | 1 | 1 |
| January 10 | 5 | 1 |
| January 12 | 2 | |
| January 13 | 1 | |
| January 15 | 3 | 2 |
| January 16 | 1 | 1 |
| January 17 | 2 | 1 |
| January 18 | 2 | 1 |
| January 19 | 4 | 2 |
| January 20 | 1 | 1 |
| January 21 | 10 | 4 |
| January 22 | 4 | 2 |
| January 23 | 5 | 4 |
| January 24 | 3 | 1 |
| January 25 | 12 | 8 |
| January 26 | 5 | 3 |
| January 27 | 5 | 5 |
| January 28 | 11 | 6 |
| January 29 | 4 | 4 |
| January 30 | 12 | 10 |
| January 31 | 13 | 10 |
| February 1 | 8 | 7 |
| February 2 | 13 | 11 |
| February 3 | 18 | 13 |
| February 4 | 13 | 8 |
| February 5 | 13 | 7 |
| February 6 | 9 | 7 |
| February 7 | 6 | 4 |
| February 8 | 6 | 3 |
| February 9 | 2 | |
| February 10 | 8 | |
| February 11 | 2 | |
| February 12 | 8 | |
| February 13 | 9 | |
| February 14 | 7 | |
| February 15 | 10 | |
| February 16 | 4 | |
| February 17 | 7 | |
| February 18 | 4 | |
| February 19 | 4 | |
| February 20 | 5 | |
| February 21 | 7 | |
| February 22 | ||
| Total | 276 | 128 |
| Last updated 11:46, 22 February 2025 UTC Current time is 12:12, 22 February 2025 UTC [refresh] | ||