User:Michael Aurel
Appearance
|
It would be a vain task to enumerate all the doctrinal elements in Ficino that can be traced to Orphic influence. The Neoplatonists had demonstrated that given the will and the ingenuity anything can be shown to be Orphic, and thus they emptied the exercise of much of its meaning.
— John Warden, "Orpheus and Ficino", in Orpheus: The Metamorphoses of a Myth, p. 92.
Useful
[edit]- {{WikiProject Banner Shell|class=stub|1=
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Mythology|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Greece|importance=low}}
}} - No sources demonstrating the relevance or significance of this to the mythological figure; see [[MOS:POPCULT]].
- Theoi.com: notoriously unreliable (see [1], a hallucinatory hodgepodge)
- Robert Graves' The Greek Myths: see § Reception
- Natalis Comes: see Fowler 2013, pp. 735–7
- Evelyn-White's edition of the Theogony: see the opening paragraph of Richard Janko's BMCR review (2007.03.31) of Most's edition
- MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE (WT:CGR discussion, Infobox deity discussion)
- MOS:POPCULT (WP:IPC)
- Automatic archiving: Help:Archiving (plain and simple); User:ClueBot III/Documentation
- Tools: XTools, Sigma, Whodunnit, Petscan
- Navigation: Navbox, List, Categories, Templates