A fact from Walkiria Terradura appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that 96-year-old Walkiria Terradura(pictured) was a member of the Italian resistance movement during World War Two and a specialist in blowing up bridges? Source: https://www.anpi.it/donne-e-uomini/1494/ "Otto furono i mandati di cattura che i nazifascisti spiccarono contro la giovane donna che si era specializzata nel minare e quindi a far saltare i ponti insieme"
ALT2 ... that Walkiria Terradura(pictured), who turned 96 on 9 January 2020, was a member of the Italian resistance movement during World War Two and a specialist in blowing up bridges?
ALT3 ... that Walkiria Terradura(pictured) was an Italian partisan during World War Two who hid her father from capture by fascist police, had eight different warrants for her arrest, was a specialist in blowing up bridges and married an OSS officer?
ALT3b ... that Walkiria Terradura(pictured) was an Italian partisan during World War Two who hid her father from capture by OVRA, was a specialist in blowing up bridges and married an OSS officer?
ALT3c ... that Walkiria Terradura(pictured) was an Italian partisan during World War Two who hid her father from capture by fascist police, was a specialist in blowing up bridges and married an OSS officer?
Overall: Interesting Good Article about a partisan from Umbria, which I enjoyed reading. The article is new and long enough, is neutral, well sourced, and Earwig could not detect any plagiarism, the picture is in public domain, QPQ has been done. The only little issue is about the hooks (which are sourced as well): all three are basically variations of the same one. Being Italian, I read all the sources, where there is plenty of information for other hooks: would it be possible to write another hook independent on the first three, maybe integrating the article? Grazie :-) Alex2006 (talk) 09:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Alessandro57: Being Italian definitely gets you brownie points, however, as an honourary Piemontese, I'll excuse your support for Roma, but as a Bruin, being a Trojan is simply intolerable. :) Thanks for the review, made something trying to cover a few of the interesting points. Let me know what you think. Salve, --Goldsztajn (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Goldsztajn: Are you a Bruin? That's why this article is so short! :-) Honorary Piemontese? I hope that you are not a supporter of Juve, this would be really too much...I enjoyed the article also because my father was Umbrian and partisan too (but he fought around Spoleto): maybe he knew her! About the hook, it is slightly under 200 chars, so to be sure that our DYK censors accept it I would shorten as in ALT3b. What do you think about it?
I'll wait till this gets a green light before giving you my real opinion of Trojans! Sorry, I didn't check the character count, I'm ok with the change but can we pipe OVRA with "fascist police"? Personally, I think better to have as few links as possible, which was why I didn't mention OVRA in the first place. --Goldsztajn (talk) 17:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting Good Article about a partisan from Umbria, which I enjoyed reading. The article is new and long enough, is neutral, well sourced, and Earwig could not detect any plagiarism, the picture is in public domain, QPQ has been done. The only little issue is about the hooks (which are sourced as well): all three are basically variations of the same one. Being Italian, I read all the sources, where there is plenty of information for other hooks: would it be possible to write another hook independent on the first three, maybe integrating the article? Grazie :-) Alex2006 (talk) 09:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Alex2006 (talk) 17:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
OK, I will take the risk :-) Good to go with a (personal) preference for ALT3c. Alex2006 (talk) 18:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
