Talk:Vera Brodsky Lawrence

A fact from Vera Brodsky Lawrence appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Vera Brodsky Lawrence (pictured) hated being called the "queen of ragtime" despite being a catalyst for the revival of Scott Joplin's music?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vera Brodsky Lawrence.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Brodsky in 1943

... that Vera Brodsky Lawrence (pictured), despite being a catalyst for the revival of Scott Joplin's music, hated being called the "queen of ragtime"? Source: Ms. Lawrence is the one who dug Scott Joplin out of the dust of libraries, took him away from the specialists, and set him loose on the world. Without her, The Sting would have had music by somebody else and there wouldn't be sixteen listings of ragtime music under Joplin's name in the classical section of Schwann's catalogue. So—whether she likes it or not—Ms. Lawrence is the queen of ragtime.[1]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Women in the Etruscan society
- Comment: ~~QPQ coming later.~~ I got more and maybe better ALTs, but for now papacito needs to go sleep for the night!

Created by CurryTime7-24 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Vera Brodsky Lawrence; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @CurryTime7-24: Good article. waiting on QPQ. Though, I would like to see the alts you mentioned. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay in new ALTs. Been traveling the past week. Without further ado...

ALT1 ... that Vera Brodsky Lawrence destroyed her personal documents and made an abrupt career shift after the death of her husband? (Source: Destruction of personal effects in [2]; career shift in [3])
ALT2 ... that Vera Brodsky Lawrence played Dmitri Shostakovich's Piano Sonata No. 2 at Carnegie Hall in the presence of Andrei Gromyko? (Source: [4])
ALT3 ... that the New York Daily News said that Vera Brodsky Lawrence "dug Scott Joplin out of the dust of libraries" and that "without her The Sting would have had music by somebody else"? (Source: [5])
ALT4 ... that pianist and host Vera Brodsky Lawrence played music ranging from Béla Bartók and Dmitri Shostakovich to Alec Templeton and Duke Ellington on her CBS radio show? (Source: Bartók, Shostakovich, Templeton, Duke)
ALT5 ... that in 1938, pianist and host Vera Brodsky Lawrence played music by Sergei Rachmaninoff, Nikolai Medtner, and Duke Ellington on the same radio program?(Source: [6]) —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 02:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Onegreatjoke to respond as it has been over 2 weeks. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CurryTime7-24 and Onegreatjoke:

iii'm not seing a QPQ? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron: I thought I had added it, but it's: Template:Did you know nominations/Women in Etruscan society. However, that DYK nomination hit a snag because of some problems with its prose and sourcing. I tried to give the submitting editor time to remedy these issues and even took a stab at them myself, but I didn't get very far as it quickly became a bigger challenge than expected and I have only so much time on my hands. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

curse me and my green redirect links. :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]