Jump to content

Talk:United States Space Force

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateUnited States Space Force is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 9, 2023Featured article candidateNot promoted

[edit]

Should the discussion on why the Space Force used army/air force ranks versus naval officer rank structure be added? Jrpotts (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why would the Space Force, which was created from the Air Force Space Command, use naval ranks? Rcarter555 (talk) 00:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the same reason the Marines, part of the Dept of the Navy, use Army ranks instead of Naval ones. But also, some people (eg: these, guys, etc.) were picturing that at some point in the future, Space Force (SF) would be crewing manned craft in space to the Moon, to Mars, to the Belt, etc. (no, not like Star Trek, at least not for a loonng time, if at all). These ships would be like submarines in space, so why not have have Naval ranks. Anyway, that didn't happen, but if there is or was a discussion taking place about this somewhere, is would be entirely appropriate to add a brief note here that i t exists, along with a link to it there. (jmho) - wolf 10:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Smallest Uniformed Service

[edit]

Both the NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps page and the United States Space Force page claim to describe the smallest uniformed service of the United States. 35.142.185.91 (talk) 07:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Space Force page states that they are the smallest "armed service" which is true. The NOAA Corps is the smallest "uniformed service," which is also true. They are not an "armed service." Neovu79 (talk) 14:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

edit war

[edit]

@User:BilCat @User:Oknazevad We should make a a protected edit request to prevent this guy @2600:100e:b210:1d42:cd3c:5a1a:b046:1146 from engaging in a edit war. I don't know how to do it because I'm kind of new. Zyxrq (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is regarding the Consensus of the use of the Seal of the United States Space Force over the logo. Zyxrq (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should be able to edit the article already, as it's only been semi- protected to prevent IP users and new registered users from editing the article. That said, the article already has the seal above the logo, so no changes need to be made. It would be helpful to link to the previous discussions mentioned in the edit summaries that support having the seal above the logo in US service articles. BilCat (talk) 03:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You would need to ask @Oknazevad. Zyxrq (talk) 01:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

independent now?

[edit]

The side bar says that Space Force is still part of Air Force. If that's outdated I suggest to replace

| image                         = [[File:Seal of the United States Space Force.svg|frameless]] <br /> [[Seal of the United States Space Force]]

by

| image                         = [[File:United States Space Force emblem.svg|frameless]] <br /> [[Seal of the United States Space Force]]

Some other wikis still use the old emblem as well. Vollbracht (talk) 01:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The USSF is under the United States Department of the Air Force, not the Air Force itself. Similar to how the Navy and USMC are two independent branches under the United States Department of the Navy. - ZLEA T\C 02:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]