Talk:The Pipettes

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rose

It's been removed now so a dedicated page could be set up, but according to the previous edit "Rosay (is) originally from Tunbridge Wells in Kent". Is she? There doesn't appear to be any reference to this online.

Removed Info

And why have we lost Rose's surname and also Gwenno's from the article? Dougall and Saunders respectively, no?

I deleted them when I set the individual pages up for the girls because it's fairly specialised information, although as I'd kept the real names of the Cassettes in I was probably wrong to do so, although someone's edited them back in now anyway. Thesaint06 22:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont see any need to say that "rose tends to get the most male attention", this is irrelevent. Someone delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.229.94 (talk • contribs)

Stub-sorting. You can help!

I've added {{UK-singer-stub}} to the three singer's bios - this isn't a criticism of the articles but they do need expansion if anyone feels the urge. The article on Monster Bobby is at present a mess and reads like a badly written advert if anyone knows enough to rewrite it. Iridescent 22:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Members

Is there any need for the 'Members' section on the main article (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/The_Pipettes#Members)? All names and roles in the band are listed in the band's infobox. Pullshapes 17:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why it's needed --Nick Dowling 00:11, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cassette v Cassettes

The backing band is indisputably called "The Cassette" and not "The Cassettes", both in all official documentation and by the band themselves in interviews. I appreciate the urge to change it to "The Cassettes" as Pipettes/Cassettes sounds "right", but this is incorrect. — iridescent 17:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As recently as the SXSW Music Festival 2007, the band announced the backing band as "The Cassettes". I have included this information in the "ref" on the page itself which documented the interview mention of "The Cassette". Given this apparent disagreement/dispute, I will seek out physical documentation in Pipettes materials that can be referenced in the article. Tantek (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

trhis is well bad

No becki and rosay leave :(

but anyways, is Ani Gwenno's sister? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilyfan87 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Ani is Gwenno's sister. She introduced herself (in person after the show) as Gwenno's sister at their promo gig at The Fly Bar in London on 2nd September. Tantek (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

updated image for new line-up

I updated the image using a PD photo (that I took and contributed to Wikimedia Commons) since the previous image update from User: Desktopgirl appears to have been taken from a copyrighted source http://www.wireimage.com ("Copyright © 2008 WireImage (A division of Getty Images, Inc.) All Rights Reserved."). While perhaps the image from User: Desktopgirl is prettier, I submit that it is preferable to have an image showing the band "in action" as it were rather than just posing, especially for a movie which is only tangentially related. I will not revert User: Desktopgirl's reversion of my update, and will instead leave this to the judgment of other editors, or perhaps the expiration of the copyright warning on the image upload from User: Desktopgirl. Thoughts or opinions? Tantek (talk) 02:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External link suggestion: A look back at We Are the Pipettes

As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this article taking a look back at the Pipettes' We Are the Pipettes. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the article and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the external links section. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! [1]
Mike harkin (talk) 18:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of name

Could not find online anything concrete about the origin of the band's name. As usual in such matters, there are many myths and a lot of hearsay but little of substance. We need something more reliable. (Incidentally, the noun pipette in French means "little pipe", and, in slang, "small blowjob". So, there is perhaps some playful double entendre, there. I'm saying this because the explanation currently contained in the article comes off like OR without citation.)-The Gnome (talk) 06:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You know what it does sound like The Chipettes if you want my opion-unamed uswer

"members" timeline table

I'm not very keen on that table. I mean, it's a good idea, but it's not very well implemented (IMHO). I was thinking I might replace it with one of the below. Does anyone have any thoughts/preferences on this? If no-one is opposed to it I'll probably be BOLD and use the top one. --Bobyllib (talk) 15:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

mid-2004-April 2005	April 2005-18 April 2008	18 April 2008-12 November 2008	11 February 2009-present
Julia Clarke-Lowes	Gwenno Saunders
Rose Elinor Dougall		Ani Saunders
Rebecca Stephens		Anna McDonald	Beth Mburu-Bowie

Member	mid-2004-April 2005	April 2005-18 April 2008	18 April 2008-12 November 2008	11 February 2009-present
Julia Clarke-Lowes	yes
Rose Elinor Dougall	yes
Rebecca Stephens	yes
Gwenno Saunders		yes
Ani Saunders			yes
Anna McDonald			yes
Beth Mburu-Bowie				yes

why is there a need for a members timeline? for godsake, it's a stupid idea and people can easily know who has left and who hasn't from the information already provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.49.209 (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Complete Discography or full song listing

my_hearts_a_bomb over_heels Who Made You The Doctor Baby Just Be Yourself dance_and_boogie-butt Dirty Mind - Acoustic Version Feminist Complaints Guess Who Ran Off With The Milkman I like a boy in Uniform In The Bleak Midwinter Judy - Acoustic Version Kitchen Sink - live Magician Man Really That Bad Santas On His Way Simon Says So I'll Say Goodbye The Burning Ambition Of Early Diuretics True Love Waits Patiently For A Miracle White Christmas Your Love For Me

There is no listing of this anywhere... period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.203.141 (talk) 03:07, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on The Pipettes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Pipettes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070825165041/http://www.thebeatsbar.co.uk/ccinterviews/thepipettes.html to http://www.thebeatsbar.co.uk/ccinterviews/thepipettes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]