Talk:Super Bowl LIX

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Super Bowl LIX article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Super Bowl LIX was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 February 2025.

Wikipedia

National Football League High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Louisiana / New Orleans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

January 26 to February 1, 2025

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

NFC for logo

It has come to my attention that there are 3 different variants of the Super Bowl 59 Logo. The first one being on the article, the second one being found here, and one found here. Now, I have a screenshot of the YouTube Short's logo saved, and I am curious if we could replace the current logo from Wikimedia Commons with either one. We just need an official source to add for the NFC information. Please feel free to reply, or talk on my user page. Thank you! - Ｍｏｄｃｒｅａｔｏｒ 🏡 🗨 📝 00:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lets just use the second logo. KameronS333 (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

will anyone add the logo for super bowl lix

we saw multiple logos but they get deleted by the bot. lets use this logo here. KameronS333 (talk) 22:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Taylor Swift Performance Halftime 68.195.135.21 (talk) 12:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 16:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Results of Super Bowls LIX

Shouldn't you include the results, or are Wikipedia users going to have to do another search? Ileanadu (talk) 11:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The results for what? The game will be played on February 9, 2025. As of today (June 29, 2024), there are no results because the game has not been played yet. HCTiger9704 (talk) 14:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I would like for the following change to be made:

"Would" implies that it's not a certainty that the game will be played at the Superdome, when it's an absolute certainty at this point. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 20:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 19:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the security part, in the "there" is says " [t] cant tell if that's a mistake or intentional Drunkensailor345 (talk) 18:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks intentional, indicating that the reference has it at the start of a sentence ("There will be...") but here it is placed in the middle of a sentence so lower case "t" is substituted. LizardJr8 (talk) 19:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: I agree with LizardJr8, this is not an error. Marking this request as answered. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 16:53, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcasters

This article is missing that it will be available across NFL digital properties, not just NFL+. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/fox-sports-to-stream-super-bowl-lix-on-tubi-a-first Reddsas321 (talk) 02:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t be annoying, add the Arabic numerals

Show the number Super Bowl it is (59). 50.245.190.85 (talk) 01:32, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, possibly in the opening

“Super Bowl LIX (59) is the upcoming American football championship game of the National Football League (NFL) for the 2024 season…” Jacket2018 (talk) 23:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Except for Super Bowl 50, the NFL has never used Arabic numerals and there is no reason for Wikipedia to do so. Assadzadeh (talk) 23:19, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First Picture Caption

The caption under the first picture on this page featuring the super bowl location has the wrong date for the event as it should be the 9th or if the sentence is describing something else the date is still misleading as I do not believe there is a 29th of February this year. 98.18.167.192 (talk) 01:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Super Bowl 059" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Super Bowl 059 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 7 § 3 digit Super Bowl redirects until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Donald Trump

A photo of Donald Trump is irrelevant to this article, which should be focus on the game itself. Please do not add it until you get consensus via this Talk page. Assadzadeh (talk) 04:46, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Assadzadeh It is neither relevant nor necessary to describe the game and its outcome. Apesbrain (talk) 06:09, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct for those who only watch the Super Bowl for the halftime show and the commercials. Assadzadeh (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for In the news: Feb 9, 2025

An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events.
Notice date: 9 February 2025. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate.

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Game time was 6:41PM ET 47.41.95.22 (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 05:31, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Script

The script is real guys Causegamr1 (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the script was real, then the Chiefs would have won. Assadzadeh (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Game summary

Please fix the game summary to add citations and a better summary. I cant because its protected thingy 2600:4808:356:7E01:267A:B57B:94B:3660 (talk) 03:21, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Exchange photo of T. Swift for one of Jake Elliott

She is irrelevant to the game, but he kicked 4 FGs setting or tying all-time SB records. Most if not all of his scoring kicks came on second longer yardage attempts due to penalties committed by his teammates. His was the most accurate performance by a kicker in SB history. Apesbrain (talk) 06:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Focus of article

The focus of this article should be kept on the game itself, not all the extraneous events associated with it. When editing articles, I ask myself "If someone is reading this article years from now, are they going to care about the details listed?" For example, I have been watching since Super Bowl XX and except for a few memorable halftime shows (e.g. Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction), I can't remember most of the performers nor which celebrities were in attendance, but can tell you who won each game and to some degree of accuracy the final score.
I hope that my comments do not offend anyone, but rather start a conversation as to what should and should not be included to improve this article and others like it. Assadzadeh (talk) 07:12, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section needs to be rephrased

Hello, The lead section needs to be rephrased to be similar to the other Super Bowl articles. Can editors please move some sentences and make the lead section stand out more? Sparkbean (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]