User talk:2601AC47

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.

Start a new talk topic.

Userboxes

This user was editing Wikipedia without a registered account for a long time before they created one.

In an emergency, this user may be slapped with a trout.

1

This user refuses to apply the adjective "unique" to anything
that is not the only one of its kind!

Beware! This user is a known WikiJaguar.

This user thinks you can learn a lot by editing an Encyclopedia.

This user helped promote Dr Disrespect to good article status.

This user strives to maintain a policy of neutrality on controversial issues.

This user participates in
WikiProject Film.

This user participates in WikiProject Video games.

This user believes that laughter is a medicine that should be taken several times a day!!! ohh yeah bay- shamelessly stolen from JPxG because...

Sellout

This user watches the Super Bowl for the ads.

This user is interested in sociology.

This user HATES winter.

This user contributes to Wikipedia on a Chromebook.

This user never tries to kill time as they can always find productive things to do that occupy them

Even Jimbo (the founder) knows how to make a appearance when you ask him. In fact, alongside Beeswaxcandle, Cwmhiraeth, CzechOut, Doc James, Heddy, Nacaru, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, SirBlaze, ThunderingTyphoons, Vermont and Xaosflux, I stalk and judicature their talk pages, and altogether, wish to form a dream jury.

This user drinks tea.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Articles for improvement.

This user is a member of
WikiProject Cleanup.

This user assists at the dispute resolution noticeboard.

This user believes that we should do no harm on any biographical article.

This user volunteers at the
Wikipedia Help Desk.

This user believes that the universe began with a big bang when God said, Let there be light.

This user is a native of the Americas.

My signature (for authenticity): 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon
How I would pronounce (IPA-like): [Twɛntiˈsɪks-oʊ-wʌn-eɪ̯-si-fɔɹtiˈsɛvn̩]

#SaveBlinx (and wait for a 3rd game, hopefully by 2027 or sooner) Also, as of Jan 27, 2025, I have exactly 433 pages on my watchlist; specifically, 5 categories, 12 WPs, 14 users (counting me) and 402 articles (counting the final two remaining SB LIX teams, temporarily until Feb 10).

In order of whether I care about it:

· [Pages relating to the Shakespeare authorship question; remembered?]

MAIL ME ONLY IF IT'S ABSOLUTELY URGENT AND YOU HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE... AND IF I'M WATCHING STRANGER THINGS, PLAYING FORTNITE OR I'M BUSY IN REAL-LIFE ELSEWHERE.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 40 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Academy Awards

Hi there, could you explain a revert reason in Academy Awards. 'World of' doesn't fit it, what does it mean? Thanks. Stevencocoboy (talk) 02:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let me just say that "excellence in the world of film industry" could not really make sense and that just "excellence in the film industry" is better in describing the purpose of the awards. Yes, the world, I assumed, refers to the industry worldwide and not just in the US; but historically and more broadly, it is usually just the industry in general. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 02:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Taylor Lorenz on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

In case you're unaware, the IP you reverted at the Teahouse is a very persistent LTA that has been spamming the Teahouse (and less frequently, other Wikipedia forums) for a few months now. They tend to personalize and hound anyone that engages with them extensively; I would recommend just reverting their edits and if need be requesting page protection, there's no need for user warnings at this point. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certainly well aware... 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 20:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sesame Workshop productions

Why did you revert my revert to 198.176.113.149's edits of List of Sesame Workshop productions? They didn't provide sources for MGM dropping out of production and/or the film releasing this year (2025). 66.164.104.47 (talk) 17:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure that the reliable sources for that may say otherwise. But there's no irony to say that MGM or Amazon aren't involved in that film anyway. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 17:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first source linked in that section of the article is only about The Witches (2020) and doesn't mention the Sesame Street movie at all, the second source mentions MGM being involved, the third source doesn't mention MGM but that doesn't indicate that they dropped out. None of the sources indicate a release year and were all retrieved around 2019/2020, not 2025. 66.164.104.47 (talk) 17:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Benedito de Lira

Please review the guidelines for {{Recent death}}. This template is used to alert editors of rapid changing edits, it is not used to advertise or confirm the death itself. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Effectively, with only several edits in 3 hours, don't put it there; got it. I may add to have a minor obsession with those that're born and dead in the same years. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 16:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Sent in error. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 03:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

~~Please stop your disruptive editing.~~

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

~~If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Help desk, you may be blocked from editing. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)~~ [reply]

(I'd rather get awarded for stopping them) 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 22:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Things were changing so fast I apparently not only misclicked when reverting but warned the wrong person. My bad. Carry on. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for semi-protecting it. Which is most shameful because, well, it has been going for so long. Any chance we've found a way to, perhaps more than anything, permanently stop his access to the wiki? 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 22:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently not. This isn't the first and won't be the last tedious repetitive troll who keeps this sort of thing up for a while, eventually they get more bored with it than we are. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 23:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explain your reverts

Not helpful of the editor in question. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 03:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

You've reverted me 9 times. I'd like an explanation, thank you. Legend of 14 (talk) 19:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because... I don't think you're going to appreciate this, but they each appeared to remove information about these agencies. I know this is not going to end well for you but: Please get consensus from other editors before you do so. Otherwise, feel free to keep that up, and risk more than a few good reverts. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 19:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't explain the removal of the maintenance tags from Office of Women's Social and Economic Opportunity, Cabinet Office (Ontario) or Zee Hamid. I did not remove any content from Cabinet Office (Ontario) or Zee Hamid. Legend of 14 (talk) 19:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or Ministry of Health (Ontario) Legend of 14 (talk) 19:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I actually want to know why you did from other articles in question? 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 19:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Long-Term Care was a bad fork, so I remerged into Ministry of Health (Ontario). Office of Women's Social and Economic Opportunity has no references so I tagged accordingly. Many of Zee Hamid's sources are missing dates or access dates, so I tagged incomplete citations. Cabinet Office (Ontario) is a stub and 1/3 citations were from the government of Ontario so I tagged accordingly. Legend of 14 (talk) 19:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used edit summaries in these cases and even had talk post listing describing my edits in the case of Ministry of Health. Legend of 14 (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely don't agree. You really did so. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 19:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did what? Legend of 14 (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closures on WP:BLPN

You have closed 2 discussion on BLPN. One of these you were involved in and contains a summary I found disrespectful towards me. The second cites the first disrespectful summary. I'm asking that you remove the disrespectful summaries. Legend of 14 (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And like that'll happen... Sorry, but I'm not going to. Someone may, if there is still in any way a discussion needed. But know this: I'm not from Ontario. I care as little as everyone else not there about the articles' content so long that whether any guidelines or points from the MoS are followed.

Do know that I'm not looking for trouble myself. If, to any extent, you still do so and try to bring me to it, than so be it. I got something else in mind to cover. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 12:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if you feel that we've let you down on here (and I wish you well going forward elsewhere). But that doesn't change the fact that there were issues with your contributions; and while I'm not seen as always well-intention or respectful as I perhaps should strive to be (and I've learned over the years to be good with those I interact on the wikis I've contributed to), I think I made things clear and sufficiently to you that this was your burden (perhaps, partly, all of us too). It's truly unfortunate that you went this way and exited through the door.

When you're ready to return to Wikipedia, than let us know. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 16:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AN Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Legend of 14 (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]