Talk:Sir Julius Vogel Award

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

NOT a copyvio

Note: Parts of this page may appear to be very similar to the information given on SFFANZ's website, notably at http://sffanz.sf.org.nz/lists/awards1989-2001.shtml. These are NOT a copyvio, since I was the co-author of both these lists. In fact, substantial amounts of the information regarding the history of the awards came to Wikipedia before it went onto the SFFANZ website. Grutness...wha? 23:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC) (a.k.a. James Dignan, SFFANZ board member and associate press officer)[reply]

Partial reversion

I've largely reverted some edits to this page made by User:Dc4444 in March 2010 which (a) were inaccurate, (b) were poorly formatted, (c) were more relevant to the page on Vogel than the page on the awards, and (d) claimed things which were not backed up by the references cited. The only relevant part has been added as one line to the section on Vogel himself (now separated out as a stand-alone section). Grutness...wha? 08:40, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]