Talk:SCi Games
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SCi Games article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "SCi Games" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Requested move 20 August 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) The Duke of NonsenseWhat is necessary for thee? 20:26, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
SCi Games → SCi – WP:COMMONNAME Lordtobi (✉) 15:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Need some evidence that the short form is actually the commonname at this point, please. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Their legal name was "SCi Entertainment plc", as they were publicly traded under that name, not "SCi Games". They previously also traded as "SCi Limited" (the full name, as given on the article, was "SCi (Sales Curve Interactive) Limited") Hence "SCi Games" is not the appropriate target", rather SCi (which currently redirects there) or, if need be, SCi (company) or SCi Entertainment. Our custom search engine for video games picks up at least 27,500 results for just "SCi" when put alongside Eidos (a company they owned and later named themselves after) and exclusions, like "sci-fi", are applied. Obviously there are more far sources outside of the Eidos scope, but it's hard to properly filter them due to the short name. On the other hand, "SCi Games" just garners around nine thousand results. Lordtobi (✉) 16:19, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose SCi should be redirected to the DAB page SCI, which I expect is a far more useful result when searching "SCi". --The1337gamer (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose and redirect SCi to SCI. I agree with The1337gamer—there is hardly a primary topic in case of this title. — bieχχ (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Proposing instead that the article be moved to SCi Entertainment. The British newspaper citations actually refer to it by this name. DA1 (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yep. As I stated above, if SCi is not a feasible target (it still redirects here), SCi Entertainment is a possible alternative. Lordtobi (✉) 19:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Lordtobi: Perhaps it's best to redirect SCi to SCI, while renaming the article in question to SCi Entertainment. DA1 (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Games
[edit]Did the company publish any games? The article doesn't mention any at all. Was it some kind of holding company, or a legal entity, or what? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- Start-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles