Talk:Rationale for the Iraq War

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rationale for the Iraq War article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Military history: Middle East / North America / United States / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

United States: Government High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Western Asia: Iraq Mid‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Iraq portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iraq (assessed as Mid-importance).

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Top-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article is light on details of deception used to justify the initial invasion

**Colin Powell** with model anthrax vial. Feb 5, 2003 at the UN.

There are many more details in the articles below. I may not have time to help much with this. So others with more time may find some of the info in the articles useful, and worthy of inclusion.

Lie by Lie: A Timeline of How We Got Into Iraq. Mother Jones, Jonathan Stein and Tim Dickinson, Sept 2006. Updated since then. Coordinated campaign of lies by the Bush administration.
Lie After Lie: What Colin Powell Knew About Iraq 15 Years Ago and What He Told the U.N. By Jon Schwarz, Feb 6, 2018, The Intercept.
Lie After Lie After Lie: What Colin Powell Knew Ten Years Ago Today and What He Said. By Jonathan Schwarz, HuffPost, Feb 5, 2013. Updated Apr 7, 2013.

-- Timeshifter (talk) 00:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some more info:

The Day I Realized I Would Never Find Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. New York Times. By J.D. Maddox. Jan. 29, 2020.

-- Timeshifter (talk) 04:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Term paper by Ibrahim al-Marashi

Why is there no refence to the "sexed up dossier" that had large parts stolen verbatim from the term paper of PhD student Ibrahim al-Marashi? This was an important part of the propaganda campaign Apeholder (talk) 10:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oil as rationale

http://archive.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/01/30/bush_asserts_authority_to_bypass_defense_act/?page=2

Per this source, Bush never stated desire to control Iraqi oil resources. The assertion of authority is assumed to be the desire to build permanent military bases for security reasons. It was the Defence Act passed by the House that automatically bundled these two things together. (Ex: US has military bases in UAE, Kuwait without controlling these countries' oil resources)

From the wikipedia article: In 2008, President Bush issued a signed statement declaring he would ignore any laws that prohibited using federal funds "to exercise United States control of the oil resources of Iraq".[85]

It is dangerously misleading to assume this is evidence in support of oil as a rationale for the Iraq War.

https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/world/struggle-for-iraq-diplomacy-iraq-said-have-tried-reach-last-minute-deal-avert.html?src=pm&pagewanted=3

From the wikipedia article: According to former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, the United States did not need to invade Iraq to control the oil. The New York Times reports that in February 2003, Baghdad had offered to give the US first priority as it related to Iraq oil rights, as part of a deal to avert an impending invasion. The overtures intrigued the Bush administration but were ultimately rebuffed.[86]

This statement of Saddam more properly belongs in the "Statement against oil as rationale" since Bush rejected the offer and subsequent oil contracts were open to foreign companies, including Russian and Chinese.

We can use this then https://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/20/iraq-war-oil-resources-energy-peak-scarcity-economy. Slatersteven (talk) 15:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheney yes. See "Why we did it" for example. Jikybebna (talk) 14:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Human rights

From wikipedia article: Documents from the National Security Archive released in 2003 show that the US and Europe provided considerable military and financial support during the Iran–Iraq war with full knowledge that the Saddam Hussein government was regularly using chemical weapons on Iranian soldiers and Kurdish insurgents.

Recommend remove reference to "documents from the National Security Archive released in 2003 show" as US aid to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War was no secret

For example see book:

-Timmerman, Kenneth R. The Death Lobby: How the West Armed Iraq. New York, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1991.

-https://web.archive.org/web/20040824084457/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jksonc/docs/ir655-nightline-19920701.html

Also, should add note that US supported Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War to prevent its defeat and there was no enthusiastic support. Aid began in 1983 when Iraq was on the defensive and being invaded by Iran and this is around the time US realised Iraq was using chemical weapons in the war.

-Sciolino, Elaine (1991). The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis. John Wiley & Sons. p. 163. ISBN 9780471542995.