Jump to content

Talk:Pauline Bart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk06:40, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by AleatoryPonderings (talk). Nominated by Ktin (talk) at 23:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

What a fascinating topic. The first statement in the body was unexpected and extremely hooky, but I suspect too avant garde for DYK (sadly). All DYK requirements met, newnews, copyvio, length. GTG. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To T:DYK/P1

Career section needs reorganization

[edit]

The Career section kinda jumps around all over the place. Part of that, I understand, is due to the sources being across the time period as well. But it can and probably should be ordered chronologically where possible, rather than mentioning things like her Ph.D. work most of the way through the section after having already discussed multiple things she did 20 years later earlier in the section. Also, third level sub-sections could also be added and their titles could have year periods (such as (1952-1967)) alongside the subsection titles themselves. And the Published Works section should probably be split up into third level subsections for books and studies. And some more studies should be thrown in there. SilverserenC 17:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]