Talk:Office for the Administrative Review of the Detention of Enemy Combatants
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"a United States military body"?
[edit]Recent changes characterize OARDEC as "a United States military body". Is it really "a United States military body"? What does that mean?
It is headed by the "Designated Civilian Official". It is said to be staffed by a mixture of civilian and military staff. Does it matter, since the head is a civilian? Maybe all the other civilian workers are based in Washington.
Other than the DCO how many civilians work for OARDEC? I don't know.
Is OARDEC performing a military role? I'd say no, it isn't. Geo Swan (talk) 00:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class military history articles
- Stub-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Stub-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles