Talk:Min Hee-jin

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Min Hee-jin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Min Hee Jin dispatch

I just included the info about dispatch and the serious issues with min based on their report. I did not go much into the details because they are really sensitive here and uncorroborated as of now. I would like to know whether the info here is written objectively and any changes I should make here?

@Cinemaandpolitics, @Paper9oll, @Btspurplegalaxy, may I know what are your opinions in this? NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 08:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to answer in different points since the matter is complex.

1) I have personally no issue in adding informations that originate from a tabloid outlet, the social relevance of Dispatch is difficult to disprove, the third party reports on it confirm it.

2) Dispatch use a very scandalistic tone, it should always be putted back on simpler grounds.

3) The latest "news" are hardly new. Min discussing with other business people was the core of the beginning of Hybe points and has already been ruled as not being "breach of trust" by a court in May. Min beeing friend with the NewJeans members is also public knowledge discussed during press releases. Everything else is psychological speculations.

4) Even though I am not against an addition of those elements, I draw a line at private messages being reported on. This isn't national defense whistblowing. There is already one instance on this page of private messages from Min being shared by third parties not involved in the conversation. I believe this to be libellous, even though some other media decide to keep reporting on them. I have not removed the information the first time though, for the sake of peace.

All of this said, I'll see if your latest edit can be refined in some way. Cinemaandpolitics (talk) 15:27, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply and analysis. Grateful that you pointed it out. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 06:31, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]