Jump to content

Talk:Maryam Nawaz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryam Nawaz/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 02:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unfortunately, this article does not appear to me ready to be listed as Good Article. The biggest problem is that the article is tremendously short, and doesn't appear to make full use of its linked sources. The reader does not get a full overview of Nawaz's life, even such major events as being put under house arrest[1], or her political views. On the other hand, the article dwells on her charity work without providing a reliable source for her involvement in these projects.
  • Another problem is that the article has a clearly non-neutral tone. The family's charity work is promoted in detail without a reliable source for Nawaz's direct involvement, and Nawaz's "vital role in the establishment of higher education in Punjab" both seems unlikely and is unsourced. "respectable and renowned" is direct editorializing.
  • I'd suggest that to become a Good Article, this should be dramatically expanded from reliable sources like the ones currently cited in the article to give a fuller picture of Nawaz's life. As a politician, it's particularly important that all claims related to her come from reliable secondary sources, not from charities run by her family. Thanks for your work on this, and good luck on expanding this! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who invented this new term Punjabi Kashmiri? There is nothing common between the Valley of Kashmir and Punjab! If a person speaks Kashmiri the Punjabi can probably not even understand a word!

Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2021

[edit]

She is convicted by courts in Pakistan.it should be on wikipedia. Mzubair81 (talk) 22:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All the details regarding her case should be on Wikipedia. Mzubair81 (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 02:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2021

[edit]
Arslajab (talk) 07:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Date Of Married Is 25 Dec 1992

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.J850NK (talk) 09:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 May 2021

[edit]
MuhammadAmjad5434452 (talk) 08:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ayeza Khan

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  Ganbaruby! (talk) 09:56, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong fact and date

[edit]

In education of maryam nawaz Wikipedia write that she left medical college in 1980 and date of birth mentioned 1973. A 7years old child can't get admission in medical school. In Pakistan you need to complete 12 years of education and a child get admission in early school at age of 5. Wikipedia largly publish wrong facts. 39.50.22.225 (talk) 02:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nani

[edit]

imran talk all the about nani means maryam she is so100 years old but she is doing surgery again and again she has 2 bacha party and her face is dull like candle 2407:D000:503:1C51:C144:F394:4719:4AC2 (talk) 03:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2024

[edit]

Please change the following : under the heading of early life and education > 4th paragraph > it’s says she “eloped “ which is culturally very sensitive and derogatory, the reference provided does not make any such comments , hence this is factually incorrect. Please change it to “married”. Thank you 39.62.8.98 (talk) 18:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thank you for bringing this to our attention. S0091 (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2024

[edit]

The complete article is not objective and seems to be written to malign Maryam Nawaz Sharif who is a popular public figure and about to take charge as Chief Minister of the biggest province of Pakistan. Please have the complete article revised by an authentic contributor. Thanks Icetlives (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 00:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to merge sections

[edit]

Currently, the BLP has two sections: one dedicated to her political career and another focusing on the Panama Papers case. However, there is overlapping information between these sections. For example: information about her corruption cases is also present within the political career section and some bits about her political career is also present within the Panama Papers case section. This duplication of information can make the page less concise and may confuse readers, IMO. I suggest we move/merge the text of Panama Papers case section into the political career section. I believe this consolidation will prevent duplication of information and streamline the presentation of BLP. Share your thoughts please! Saqib (talk) 18:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SheriffIsInTown: --Saqib (talk) 23:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SheriffIsInTown: Reminding again. I value your opinion and would appreciate hearing your thoughts on this matter. --Saqib (talk) 11:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I am not in favor of merging the sections as it would just muddy the political career section. In reality, her political career is starting just now, before that she held some minor positions. The cases against her were influenced by the establishment while judiciary was part and parcel in their plan. The real target was Nawaz Sharif but to inflict maximum pain they punished his daughter. In a society like Pakistan if you want to really give a painful punishment, punish the person’s daughter. This aspect of those cases need to be covered sometimes in the future, there is plenty of material out there. I just don’t have too much interest working on Maryam’s article at this point, I was only trying to polish it for ITN which has already gone down the drain. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 12:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SheriffIsInTown: I agree with you. BTW, I've expanded the political career section. However, I believe the section should be renamed (although I'm unsure of the most appropriate title) because much of the information is unrelated to her political career. Similarly, the Panama Papers case section could be merged into it. The last few paragraphs could be placed under the political career section. What's your opinion on this? --Saqib (talk) 18:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The section is extensive, and I currently lack the time to read it thoroughly. However, I did skim through it. My initial impression is that it could be condensed; there appears to be some content that seems undue. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. I definitely need your help to fix the issues. --Saqib (talk) 08:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

@SheriffIsInTown: She is often referred to by the media as Maryam Safdar and that's her legal name too. See this. Saqib (talk) 23:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated the text in the early life section using the reference you supplied. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 00:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wrong information about her father return

[edit]

Acquittal from Corruption case it says his father never came back from London, which is wrong. Also paragraph should clearly say that court acquitted Maryam on basis of no evidence presented by NAB. It was on merit. Ranjha876 (talk) 00:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ranjha876: Thanks for highlighting. Her acquittal is already mentioned in the political career section. --Saqib (talk) 08:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Information

[edit]

The information which you have added in political career >Parliamentary debut ,last paragraph that the opposition has announced to hold parallel parliament session and accused maryam of being a fake chief minister is not evident.Moreover,there is NO constitutional permission to hold parallel session and it never happened in the history of Pakistan.Stop misguiding people and please show some request for the Chief Minister of the biggest province of Pakistan. Ali28349 (talk) 10:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ali28349: it's important to include PTI's perspective for the sake of maintaining neutrality. We're simply reflecting what reliable sources have reported, and our intention is not to mislead. Our goal is to provide a balanced representation of the information, irrespective of any anyone's preferences. And sorry we're not here to appease respected Chief Minister. --Saqib (talk) 11:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An editor on wikipedia should be unbiased,but unfortunately you are.Did I compel you to appease the CM?According to Pakistan’s Constitution,there is no grant to hold parallel parliamentary sessions.If so ,prove it please. 39.45.96.251 (talk) 11:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover,It is a biography,not an analytical debate that you will have to represent all political parties to prove your balanced nature. Ali28349 (talk) 11:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not displaying bias. I've included numerous positive aspects about Maryam on this page. When you said, "please show some respect for the Chief Minister," what exactly did you mean? Well we merely mentioned what PTI stated and what sources reported. You can always provide a rebuttal to this information, but deleting it outright isn't justified. --Saqib (talk) 11:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When did PTI announce to hold parallel parliamentary sessions?Prove it please. Ali28349 (talk) 11:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See please https://www.dawn.com/news/1817410 --Saqib (talk) 11:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Accept this huge mistake which is not supported by sources and has no constitutional grant. Ali28349 (talk) 11:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

[edit]

@SheriffIsInTown: You've often pointed out that I tend to add a lot of trivia to this BLP, so I wanted to seek your input on whether this one merits inclusion or not. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 07:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not consider it encyclopedic. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 10:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine but it has made a lot of noise. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 12:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]