Jump to content

Talk:Lynn Boylan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

There are some issues affecting succession boxes which could affect this person and several other Irish politicians being discussed at Talk:Nick Griffin and the Wikipedia:No original research noticeboard. PatGallacher (talk) 23:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lynn Boylan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

False claims on Boylans qualifications.

[edit]

false claim on qualifications. The actual qualification level is unlikely to be accurate here. Provide actual level of qualification - post grad or not? If she never did a degree, it is unlikely she did a post grad course. It could be resolved by reference to the actual qualification instead of the dubious vague descriptions. An poblacht magazine does not constitute a reliable reference and is also suspiciously vague in the article. 109.76.9.229 (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In terms of:
  • WP:RS. Whether and in what circumstances An Phoblacht may be considered reliable is covered in WP:RSP#An_Phoblacht.
  • WP:AD. If a statement is disputed, you can tag it. Please don't add your own thoughts/commentary/etc to the main Article namespace. And certainly not in a way that may cause issues with WP:LBL. (With terms like "dishonest". When "disputed" is less loaded. And when Hanlon's razor may apply.)
  • WP:CON. I, for one, am largely comfortable with the change from "went on to earn post-graduate qualifications from [UCD]" to "went on to earn qualifications from [UCD]". Effectively just striking the "post-graduate" part. Although the "journey" to the compromise wording wasn't exactly ideal.
Bye. Guliolopez (talk) 19:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]