Talk:Leahy Law
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Untitled
[edit]I think whoever is writing this page ought to change the stub label to {{US-law-stub}} . Just a suggestion. --Eastlaw 08:37, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- thanks I will do now.Travb 09:02, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Leahy Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140611062958/http://www.humanrights.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Leahy-Vetting-Law-Policy-and-Process.pdf to http://www.humanrights.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Leahy-Vetting-Law-Policy-and-Process.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718193715/http://usacac.leavenworth.army.mil/CAC/milreview/Spanish/NovDec07/mcfatespanovdec07.pdf to http://usacac.leavenworth.army.mil/CAC/milreview/Spanish/NovDec07/mcfatespanovdec07.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
ostensibly
[edit]i added the term "ostensibly" to the declarative statement that this law prohibits assistance to entities based on human rights violations, due to the State Department refusing to use the law after it was found that IDF committed atrocities in the West Bank. it is probably a good idea to discuss this here, and i will check back from time to time to see if it is challenged. Daddyelectrolux (talk) 01:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- This seems like a good change, and deserves to be mentioned in the lead. 72.14.126.22 (talk) 02:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- United States Government articles needing infoboxes
- United States articles needing infoboxes
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English