Jump to content

Talk:Kristen Bell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleKristen Bell has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 17, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Was she starred in episode 22, season 3, of Gilmore Girls?

[edit]

Was she starred in episode 22, season 3, of Gilmore Girls? 2601:282:8700:FC10:852E:CFF5:FE1:4F62 (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, she was not in Gilmore Girls. Jamsneptune (talk) 06:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awards and nominations

[edit]

The awards section needs to be updated to include the following:

2022 - Disney Legends Award - Honoree

2022 - People's Choice Awards - The Female TV Star of 2022 - The Woman in the House Across the Street from the Girl in the Window - Nominated Jamsneptune (talk) 06:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-vaccination

[edit]

Re: a current sentence in the article: "She and her husband Dax Shepard are pro-vaccination." (with two article cites): I can't come up with terrific verbiage myself, but I'm wondering if the statement could be more "She and her husband have emphasized that they are pro-vaccination in social media and elsewhere." Simply stating that a person is "pro-vaccination" seems a bit odd for an encyclopedia, unless there's a bit more there. The "more" here, which is brought out in the cites, is that they've made statements in the public forum and there has been positive and negative public reaction to the statements. EricTN (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

  • There are uncited statements in the article, and an unresolved "more sources needed" orange banner from 2023.
  • There are numerous one-sentence paragraphs in the article, which negatively affect the MOS:LAYOUT. These should be merged together and formatted more effectively.

Is anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]