Talk:Ižakovci

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 35 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Historical name

The historical name Ižekovci appears in the cited 1921 source in standard Slovenian. The Prekmurje dialect name Ižekofci appears in the cited 2009 source. Both names are clearly sourced and should not be conflated. Doremo (talk) 14:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Ižekovci/Ižekofci not historical and not dialectical name, only the orthography is another. The Ižekovci/Ižekofci name is the original, not the Ižakovci, this is forcible name. In Čepinci the original name is the Čöpenci/Čöpinci. The Novak's dictionary is a relevant linguistic book. Doncsecz^talk 14:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this video also "iz Ižekovec" (nom. Ižekofci, gen. Ižekovec). Doncsecz^talk 14:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling Ižekovci is cited in a historical standard Slovenian source and is identified as such. The spelling Ižekofci is cited as a dialect form in another source and is also identified as such. There does not appear to be a problem. Doremo (talk) 14:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, the "vc" also can be found in the Standard Prekmurian, and this is not Slovene influence, but Kajkavian. However this "v" was never clear v in the Standard Prekmurian, but "f." Doncsecz^talk 14:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]