Talk:Hide and Q

Hide and Q has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hide and Q is part of the Star Trek: The Next Generation (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 20, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
August 10, 2016	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 20, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Maurice Hurley was credited for writing the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode "Hide and Q" under a pseudonym in protest against Gene Roddenberry's numerous rewrites?

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tenth or Ninth

Are we sure of the episode numbering? 136.32.62.205 (talk) 05:24, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, it should have been 10. I fixed it. --Fru1tbat (talk) 14:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article intro says tenth but the Infobox says 9.

The episode list at Star Trek: The Next Generation (season 1) says it is episode 10. The previous episode is currently listed as 9 and the next episode is currently listed as 11. I think it I can safely also correct the Infobox to say this is episode 10. -- 109.78.194.208 (talk) 06:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hide and Q/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 05:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to note that this is part of the first season of the series.

Added to the lead. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The lead should be expanded a little to include more background information about the episode. I like the way people are writing up the articles on The Office with a note about where its broadcast, some brief background on the show, the subplots, and a little more detail about critic responses.

I think that's done. I had based it on the Office episodes but had missed out a couple of the elements. Miyagawa (talk) 14:03, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In Production: "...proved to be a turning point for the series in how scripts were produced." -- how was this?

I've expanded that line. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article should note the next time de Lancie returns to reprise the role of Q.

Done. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In "Reception," there's no information about the market share or viewership of the episode when it first aired.

Next Gen broadcast directly into syndication, so there's no readily available sources for the numbers of viewers. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You mention the guest actors in the infobox, but their roles there are not cited. Would be best if you added the roles next to the names in the "Production" section.

Done. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Star Trek: The Next Generation actor Wil Wheaton reviewed the episode for the Huffington Post..." when did this review take place? Obviously after the series ended.

Modified the line to explain that. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dup link tool returns two results: "Q (Star Trek)" and "Star Trek: The Original Series."

Should be fixed now. Miyagawa (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dab links shows no disambiguations. Checklink tool returns no errors with external links.

I am placing the article on hold pending the above comments. —Ed!^(talk) 05:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great work here too. Passing GA. —Ed!^(talk) 00:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hide and Q. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130419050017/http://www.tower.com/star-trek-next-generation-episode-11-hide-q-patrick-stewart-vhs/wapi/109139370 to http://www.tower.com/star-trek-next-generation-episode-11-hide-q-patrick-stewart-vhs/wapi/109139370

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant photo

Is it just me or does anyone else think that the image of Marina Sirtis is offtopic? She was cut from multiple episodes, it wasn't anything in particular about this episode. By the end of the season she was left wondering if she was coming back (but the Crosby and McFadden left, and Rodennbery liked Sirtis so it worked out). That it isn't specifically relevant to this episode is it? I'd suggest another picture, such as of John de Lancie, or no picture at all. -- 109.78.194.208 (talk) 06:57, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed 2001:9E8:4612:7300:B578:229F:D82:21DA (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]