Talk:Girlfriend

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Girlfriend article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 24 April 2017, see discussion.
Keep, 19 January 2008, see discussion.
Speedy Keep, 12 August 2006, see discussion.
Speedy Keep, 19 June 2006, see discussion.
Snow Keep, 4 May 2006, see discussion.
Keep, 11 April 2006, see discussion.
Keep, 28 March 2005, see discussion.
Keep, 28 November 2004, see discussion.

Gender studies Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

It is requested that an image or photograph of Girlfriend be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Proposed merge of Boyfriend into Girlfriend

DON'T MERGE.

Result of the discussion was don't merge. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The articles at Girlfriend and Boyfriend suffer from people trying to say what the word means instead of what the subject is. Boyfriend is worse, but the problem is significant in both. I recommend that we merge them into a single article, perhaps taking over the Romantic partner redirect as the name, and focusing on the encyclopedic subject. That means:

less about the word
less about other subjects that are sometimes described with the same words
less about synonyms
more about what it means to begin and end these relationships (e.g., is it a rite of passage?)
more about the social implications (e.g., is it meant to progress towards cohabitation or marriage?)
more about the demographics (e.g., age at first becoming a boyfriend/girlfriend?)
more about how the concept of being a romantic partner differs across time and cultures (e.g., in 1950s America, it was acceptable to have multiple girlfriends/boyfriends).

What do you think? WhatamIdoing (talk) 14:59, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I read both and I don't see this as being a good way of covering this. It's like merging man into woman, boy into girl, or male into female - sure, one could put the merged article under some gender neutral title, but it still would be an awkward combined article. I don't think we can make merge decisions based on content that does not yet exist, and may not exist for many years or ever, while at the same time talking about it being 'less' of the existing content, even though that stuff is still here. Sometimes encyclopedia articles are heavily or exclusively focused on words or phrases; e.g., LGBT. A major concern of mine, also, is that a merged article under "romantic partner" would be a WP:CFORK of Romance (love), which can often lead to fragmented or even contradictory coverage of a subject. All of what you say under "more about" should be covered there. Incidentally, the Romantic partner redirect should probably go to that article, not to Love. Crossroads ^-talk- 05:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per Crossroads. These are completely different terms, it's not feasible or logical to merge them. We should improve this article instead. Also, this would probably mess up the userboxes that link to these pages. Herbfur (talk) 15:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per the other two users. I understand what the OP is saying, but their suggestions can be added to the existing article, improving it in that way, rather than merging the two pages together. Also, the terms "boyfriend" and "girlfriend" have significance to the gay and lesbian communities, as they use them, so combining them would undoubtedly lead to more confusion. Historyday01 (talk) 22:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This was proposed back in August and every single comment has been in opposition. How (and why) is this discussion still open? Shouldn't an admin or the OP close this? Historyday01 (talk) 19:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, everything doesn't need to be inclusive. Inclusion may lead to confusion as the users above me stated. PyroFloe (talk) 03:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, and agree this should be wrapped up.--Surv1v4l1st ^{▌Talk|Contribs▌} 21:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

A girlfriend is a woman who is a friend, acquaintance or partner to the speaker, usually a female companion with !who! one is platonically, romantically, or sexually involved.

PLEASE REPLACE THE WORD "whom" WITH "WHO", BECAUSE THAT WORD IS TERRIBLY RAGE-INDUCING!!! 84.142.169.230 (talk) 18:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: No. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]