This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dyslexia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DyslexiaWikipedia:WikiProject DyslexiaTemplate:WikiProject DyslexiaDyslexia articles
Georgina Chapman is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
In this edit, with the edit summary of "Life and career: Duchess of Cambridge info is irrelevance as this person did not do that well in showbiz and made her "name" being married to a millionaire film producer."Pam-javelin removed a passage that said Chapman attended -- "...the same prestigious public school as the Duchess of Cambridge, the former Kate Middleton.[1] Middleton and Chapman were two of dozen women The Telegraph cited when it characterized the School as "a seed bed for grooming alpha consorts."
I think contributor completely missed the point of that passage.
Contributor wrote Chapman "made her 'name' being married to a millionaire film producer." And Middleton made her name being married to royalty. The dozen women named as "alpha consorts" were all smart women who, in spite of the impressive credentials some of them had, were more well known for who they were married to than for their own accomplishments. That's what the reporter meant when she called them "alpha consorts".
So, unless Pam-javelin, or some other contributor, can offer a convincing explanation as to why this passage should stay excised, I think it should be restored. Geo Swan (talk) 13:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, feel free to revert or change the wording - no offence will be taken.
.jpg){kind=small}
