Jump to content

Talk:Devon County War Memorial

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleDevon County War Memorial is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 20, 2018.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 8, 2016Good article nomineeListed
October 12, 2016WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
December 31, 2016Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 3, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Devon County War Memorial is hewn from a single block of granite quarried on Dartmoor, the largest that its architect Edwin Lutyens was able to acquire?
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Devon County War Memorial/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 21:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Will review tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it customary to use capital letters for "War Crosses"?

Generally no, but in this case "War Cross" is Lutyens' name for the design of his 15 cross-shaped war memorials so I've treated it as a proper noun (the sources do likewise). I'll get round to turning into a blue link at some point. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I shortened some of the longer sentences but I can't find much fault with this at all, good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Perfectly satisfactory for GA. Hope to see more at GAN!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Afternoon! I just read your article and wanted to give you some feedback! I think the article was very informative. Your resources were reliable which helped me feel comfortable with the info and your credibility. I wouldve loved a translation to the Latin inscription on the memorial. In summary, I think you did a great job posting and presenting the info in a professional and unbiased manner! Nmateo1997 (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.