Talk:Bible Adventures
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bible Adventures article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Bible Adventures" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The game is for children to play--NOT ADULTS!
[edit]You need to add that it's mainly for KIDS!
...Since WHEN is Seanbaby a reliable source? Quote from Gamespy or someone more official, credible, and reliable...
-- JBF —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfritzyb (talk • contribs)
- I can't say I understand why it is imperative that it be stated that this game is for kids. --Thaddius 15:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
--- I'd say it's not worth mentioning that the game is for kids, especially since most games at the time were released with that audience in mind. I'd also say that the Seanbaby reference is acceptable not as indicator of the quality of the game, but rather as trivia. Col.clawhammer 00:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- What does this have to do with anything? Xizer 08:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Irrelevant Topic
[edit]Whether or not that this game was made for kids is irrelevant to the article; also keep in mind that Wikipedia is also not mainly for kids; in fact, it's the exact opposite.
With that being said, the original unsignee is correct that Seanbaby is not a reliable source, and is probably, as aforementioned, included as trivia, which is nonetheless discouraged per Wikipedia guidelines. Even then, more official sources, e.g. IGN, Gamespy should be used if applicable. (Keep in mind that you will not find much at all for reviews online of unlicensed NES games made 15+ years ago.) MuZemike (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Bible adventures.jpg
[edit]
Image:Bible adventures.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Do we
[edit]Do we need the ref to Menace Beach? It confuses me. Lots42 (talk) 13:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Not Part of WikiProject Nintendo
[edit]This game was not released by Nintendo nor by its 2nd or 3rd party developers, which is a requirement for an inclusion of a game into WikiProject Nintendo.
I will remove the WikiProject Nintendo reference. MuZemike (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Copyright infringement?
[edit]I'm going to remove the copyright infringement claim. It's unsourced and isn't appropriate without verifiability. (Writing an unauthorized game isn't copyright infringement and neither is zapping 10NES.) Kufat (talk) 23:41, 27 November 2009 (UTC)