Jump to content

Talk:Berkshire Women cricket team

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 19 October 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There’s no consensus to move at this time. Best, (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


– To fit with the convention of every other countries' domestic teams, and international teams: e.g. Railways women's cricket team, Victoria women's cricket team, South Africa women's national cricket team. Even more so with the Project Darwin reforms from next year, with teams more likely to be presented as, for example, the women's cricket team of Somerset interchangeably with the men's cricket team of Somerset, rather than a separate entity called Somerset Women. I assume this is likely to be pretty non-controversial, but using RM anyway due to the number of pages involved. Mpk662 (talk) 13:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Without having checked, any that are the official or common name now should be kept. If that changes in the future then they can be moved at that point but it would be WP:CRYSTAL to move on the basis that something might become more common after something happens next year. Thryduulf (talk) 12:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Moves

[edit]

Some of these pages have now been moved, against the result of the above discussion. I've raised a technical RM to move the Essex women's team bak to its original name, but does there need to be a further discussion now? Bcp67 (talk) 16:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be titled as Essex women's cricket team and not Essex Women cricket team. Pkr206 (talk) 16:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do you guys agree?: @Joseph2302, @Bs1jac, @Godknowme1, @Goodknowme, @PEditorS10, @Cric editor, @WikiEditPS, @MNWiki845, @Vestrian24Bio? Pkr206 (talk) 17:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My view is same as it was in the RM: wait until the seasons start. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:08, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And all of the undiscussed moves were made by a user Sportzlove who is now blocked for disruption. Pkr206 we had a move discussion with consensus not to move right now, so unless something has dramatically changed which requires a new RM (which it hasn't in my opinion), then all articles should be moved back to match consensus. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:11, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As per WP:RMUM, I have moved them all back to the names that they were prior to the RM which had no consensus to move any of them. None of these pages should be moved again without a WP:RM consensus to do so. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:17, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As per RM it satisfied but we still wait for season start. See what is the result of discussion. Goodknowme (talk) 17:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]