Talk:Bear's Rib

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bear's Rib. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060426230052/http://www.axel-jacob.de:80/chiefs20.html to http://www.axel-jacob.de/chiefs20.html#rib

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

potentially useful sources

I'm going to try expanding this page. I couldnt find a page for Bear's rib on encyclopedia britannica but I did find this source. I'm not sure if this would be useful or not so I'm just going to leave it here in the meantime whilst I find other sources on them. https://dc.library.okstate.edu/digital/collection/kapplers/id/29700/ AssanEcho (talk) 20:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only source I could find just by looking up " "Bear's Rib" native american " (I put quotations around their name to make the search specific) was this history.net article https://www.historynet.com/he-who-has-no-ears/ from 2016. I searched on the sources discussions archive and it seems that the only discussion about the sites reliablity was in 2022 [1] which stated that the site whilst not perfect was good enough to cite. I also found an editor who used a history.net article as a reliable citation during the discussion of a despute or something... idk im not looking that deep into this beyond the context they used the source in which seems to be postitive [2].

I'll be basing my decision to use it as a source on that decision that was made. I know its not a very good or long discussion but its something to work off of and if you have issue with me doing this feel free to revert and discuss. AssanEcho (talk) 21:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]