Jump to content

Talk:Arlene Dahl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Birthyear

[edit]

Was Arlene born in 1923 or 1928? The date was recently changed with no proof given. Hotwine8 03:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did a search and so far I haven't found a definite date. Roaming27 00:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
She was born in 1925 per the 1930 United States census. Someone made her younger. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 20:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC). See 1930 US census data. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct that she was probably born in 1925, because I posted the 1930 Census on another site. :) Stutzey (talk) 21:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)stutzey[reply]

File:Arlene Dahl - 1946.JPG Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Arlene Dahl - 1946.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Arlene Dahl - 1946.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who gives a damn about a copyright on a picture for crying out loud? Leave the freaking thing alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.23.21.81 (talk) 13:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We're obligated to do as much as we can to adhere to copyright laws. Just because it is inconvenient does not mean we (or anyone) can simply ignore it. Huntster (t @ c) 22:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]