Talk:Aita (disambiguation)

On 10 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Aita. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Requested move 10 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 22:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aita (disambiguation) → Aita
Aita → Aita (mythology)

– The title has different meanings, probably the deity is not the primary one. See also Special:WhatLinksHere/Aita MrKeefeJohn (talk) 14:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Of the entries on the disambiguation page, there are only two that are called Aita, rather than AITA or a partial disambiguation where Aita is a first or last name. Of those, one of those is an article about a river that is four sentences long that looks like a database entry simply documenting it exists, and the other is an article about a regional musical style that is three sentences long and contains no references. The Etruscan deity probably does have long-term significance over those two, and it receives most of the pageviews as well. Egsan Bacon (talk) 03:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the entries are not two, but three. I mean Aita, Aita (river) and Aita (Morocco). And there should be also Aita (given name) and Aita (surname) MrKeefeJohn (talk) 21:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I add [1] and it seems that Aita it's the most relevant topic.MrKeefeJohn (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Names are not to be discounted, and the qualities of the other articles are inappropriate measures of the topics' significance. A Google Scholar search shows no clear primary topic. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, and per Hameltion. BD2412 T 00:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose The deity is indeed primary, as all other uses fall under WP:DIFFCAPS or WP:PTM, or have massively fewer views. Names are naturally partial title matches unless the person in question is commonly referred to only as that name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Religion has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Disambiguation has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, A google search brings up the subreddit first, then the Etruscan god. Also, I feel like the shortness argument is not valid; the god, while not a stub, only has 6,000 bytes of info (of which I am assuming the majority are in the citations and bibliography). ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 15:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: the god appears to be the primary topic for the mixed-case version, while the Reddit is primary for AITA. PamD 17:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per Egsan Bacon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the pageviews, and the deity likely having greater long-term significance. I don't think the Reddit topic poses a problem, as it seems always to be referred to in all caps, and so is covered by WP:DIFFCAPS. – Michael Aurel (talk) 04:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination, Hameltion, BD2412 and Mitch199811. There are eleven entries listed upon the Aita (disambiguation) page and the six-sentence stub delineating the Etruscan deity Aita does not confirm historical renown of such overwhelming extent as to dwarf the combined notability of the ten remaining entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 08:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.