Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Singapore

To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, the talk page of the following project pages redirect here:

Centralized discussions

WikiProject Singapore was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on February 2010.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by .

Article alerts

Article alerts

Articles for deletion

28 Jan 2025 – SepPure Technologies (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Mekomo (t · c); see discussion (4 participants)
27 Jan 2025 – Toku (company) (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by NiftyyyNofteeeee (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
27 Jan 2025 – Singdarin (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Clubette (t · c); see discussion (4 participants; relisted)
23 Jan 2025 – AXS Pte Ltd (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by CNMall41 (t · c); see discussion (6 participants; relisted)
14 Jan 2025 – List of Hindu empires and dynasties (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Mr.Hanes (t · c); see discussion (18 participants; relisted)

Redirects for discussion

13 Jan 2025 – Banana à milanesa (talk · edit · hist) →Banana fritter was RfDed by Consarn (t · c); see discussion

Files for discussion

24 Jan 2025 – File:Wong Chik Yeok.png (talk · edit · hist) (on Killing of Wong Chik Yeok) was FfDed by Robertsky (t · c); see discussion

Good article nominees

02 Feb 2025 – Marine Terrace MRT station (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Icepinner (t · c); start discussion
26 Jan 2025 – Simei MRT station (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Icepinner (t · c); see discussion
22 Jan 2025 – Sengkang LRT line (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by ZKang123 (t · c); start discussion
23 Dec 2024 – Bukit Brown Cemetery (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Actuall7 (t · c); start discussion
12 Dec 2024 – Jehovah's Witnesses in Singapore (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Kingoflettuce (t · c); start discussion
20 Nov 2024 – Bedok MRT station (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Imbluey2 (t · c); start discussion
04 Nov 2024 – Amos Yee (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by OpalYosutebito (t · c); see discussion
31 Oct 2024 – Halimah Yacob (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Pangalau (t · c); see discussion
31 Jan 2025 – Lakeside MRT station (talk · edit · hist) GA nominated by Icepinner (t · c) was closed

Good article reassessment for Fort Pasir Panjang

Fort Pasir Panjang has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

Good article reassessment for Kelvin Tan

Kelvin Tan has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Old National Library Building

Old National Library Building has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National Day Parade and among others

@Robertsky and Z1720: After I seen the Template:Singapore_National_Day_Parade, I was considering on writing or making an article akin to the opening and closing ceremonies of the 2024 Summer Olympics since that there were articles and would be useful for archival purposes, including next year celebrating the 60th anniversary since independence. But there are reviews like no-such articles exist or not necessary. I leave you to decide. Sculture65 (talk) 04:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: Furthermore, I left a topic in the List of major crimes in Singapore_(2020–present)'s talk page and hoping to improve the articles for better clarity and organization itself. Do also let me know. Sculture65 (talk) 04:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review

I have nominated Toa Payoh ritual murders for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Denise Phua

Denise Phua has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 04:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:LGBTQ topics in Singaporean literature#Requested move 24 November 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:LGBTQ topics in Singaporean literature#Requested move 24 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --MikutoH ^talk! 03:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Central Executive Committee (PAP)#Requested move 5 December 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Central Executive Committee (PAP)#Requested move 5 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Feeglgeef (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need some help List of major crimes in Singapore_(2020–present)

Dear @Robertsky, Justanothersgwikieditor, and Number 57:, I pinged is that I noted the edits by that particular someone I not gonna name, but that one happened to have edited was somewhat new to the Wikipedia (having joined less than three months ago, I think the person was still new to it), and apparently reverting or reversing some of the edits (including mine) that has some issues, along with the editing methods. I just do not want to engage into conflicts against the users involved, but I also not sure on what I am going to do either and if I will interfere, it will become worse. Need help to discuss that in a proper manner, thank you so much! Sculture65 (talk) 07:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sculture65, If it is a content dispute, try engaging the other editor on the article talk page first. I think it is not proper for me or the rest to step in without knowing specifically which edits you have objections to, and also without knowing how the other editor will respond to an attempt for discussion. There's some advice on how to go about doing at WP:RCD. – robertsky (talk) 09:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@robertsky, I not too experienced on how to resolve disputes, and besides the user was new. I read on the RCD, and just to ask is WP:DRN OK? Sculture65 (talk) 10:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum, I also noted on the user talk page and it seems to be like being harsh at one other who think that he is right and everyone is wrong. I not sure on what can I do besides RCD and DRN. Sculture65 (talk) 11:36, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sculture65 If you look at an existing DRN case, you will realise that first question is "Have you discussed this on a talk page? which the answer is a no. So without this first step, DRN will not do anything about it. Ideally discuss it on the article talkpage instead of a user talkpage to reduce influence and sense of "vandalism" on either personal talkpage. Until that is done, I believed we are unable to make any comments as we will be making assumptions. I noted you are on a break, have a good rest and enjoy the festivities first. ~ JASWE (talk) 05:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:SMRT infobox colour

A discussion is ongoing at Template talk:SMRT infobox colour on whether to keep the new or old format of the infobox station name template that's on top of every MRT article.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Article 12 of the Constitution of Singapore

Article 12 of the Constitution of Singapore has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Article 14 of the Constitution of Singapore

Article 14 of the Constitution of Singapore has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]