Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Documentation
[edit]For discussion of the Coordinators list
Discussion
[edit]Continuing from my talk page
[edit]Would this work for a B-class checklist?
<!-- B-Class checklist --> <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points out outside of a plot section are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1= <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2= <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3= <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4= <!-- 5. If possible, it contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5= <!-- Reviews and collaborations --> |A-Class= |collaboration-candidate= |past-collaboration= |peer-review= |old-peer-review=
In other thoughts:
- Should we tag our PR as inactive and just start up an A-class process instead? It would be of greater benefit to the project, IMO, and it should also help editors more. I think that between us two, Liveste, and (maybe) a requirement to make nominators review another A-class nom we should be able to do alright as long as we aren't flooded.
- Should we also tag the newsletter with an inactive tag? This seems like a foregone conclusion...
—Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 09:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Parameters seem good to me. Tag newsletter as inactive seems ok - but with a message that with an editor it can soon be revived. It might encourage someone to volunteer. I'd leave the Peer review for the minute and see how a A-class process went first. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 13:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Alright. I'm just trying to throw ideas out there...maybe that Coords working group is influencing me too much. ;)
- What nomenclature should we use? I.e. Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Assessment/ or set up a new Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Review/ ? —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 23:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Parameters seem good to me. Tag newsletter as inactive seems ok - but with a message that with an editor it can soon be revived. It might encourage someone to volunteer. I'd leave the Peer review for the minute and see how a A-class process went first. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 13:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
One last newsletter
[edit]I got one together here, Kevin; please check it out and make whatever changes you deem necessary. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 23:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- perhaps a bit negative in view - I wouldn't myself have been that down on things. But I don't feel strongly enough about it to make changes. Good for you to put this together. Are you able to send it out? :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was trying to shock. :) I toned it down a bit; double-check quick? Is there anything big missing? And I'll leave a note on Tucherianbot's talk page after you check it out once more :) —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 21:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, go for it. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was trying to shock. :) I toned it down a bit; double-check quick? Is there anything big missing? And I'll leave a note on Tucherianbot's talk page after you check it out once more :) —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 21:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Coordinators.
[edit]According to the Coordinators page, the Coordinators term should have been up on March 5, and there should have been another election. The project seems to be declining a bit activity wise, so I think we need to get things going. I'll post a message on the Coordinators talk-pages. Let's see if we can get the Project up and running again. Wikipedia needs it. Alan16 (talk) 19:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
I am currently working on 3 novel articles and would love some additional feedback and any help that can be given. And I have an issue on the fact that there has been no new election. Is this project behind? Tetobigbro talk 04:18, 3 June 2010 (UTC)