Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 7

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This template is redundant as it is not used (so far as I can discover) and it does not separate biological and geological SSSIs. Template:SSSIs Kent does separate different classes of SSSI and it is used in articles. Dudley Miles (talk) 23:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template is not used in Article nor Category space. Largely redundant with {{Proterozoic footer}}hike395 (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 12:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all redlinks, finished in last place in Group B, and squad membership is already in 2012 African Women's Championship squads Frietjes (talk) 22:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 19:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Africa Women's Cup of Nations is a major tournament, as it is a top-level continental tournament, making it as major as UEFA Women's Euro or the Gold Cup. There has been previous consensus for a top-level continental tournament to be the criteria for including squad navboxes. Joeykai (talk) 21:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 15. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 12:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 15. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 12:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Biblioworm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 19:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and broken. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).