Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 13
November 13
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Hoax, creator blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Template:CM Blas Kids (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No article for "CM Blas Kids" exists, and Google searches turn-up very little. None of the articles included in the template appear to mention "CM Blas Kids." —jameslucas (" " / +) 20:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Appears to be a vandal/hoax, now using IP to try to include this in Tom and Jerry article XyzSpaniel Talk Page 15:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, probably a hoax. in any event, not a notable grouping. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - it's a hoax EvergreenFir (talk) 17:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep after changes Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Gbmlink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template relies on a dead script from Toolserver. If someone can resurrect it with some other means with its parameter Template:OS coord then it is salvagable. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep Now Fixed —hike395 (talk) 14:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Second nomination, subsequent to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_August_13#Template:Outreachwiki_case_study
It has not been used, and the end link at toolserver is dead. A template can be recreated at this name if it is ever needed. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, unused and broken. Frietjes (talk) 15:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
unused template that calls upon toolserver, broken script. If not deleted, please shell out dead link — billinghurst sDrewth 10:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, unused and broken. Frietjes (talk) 15:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Lonelypages (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template that uses dead toolserver, and has not functional use — billinghurst sDrewth 09:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, nearly unused and broken. Frietjes (talk) 15:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No active uses, and not actively linked for use. Can be retired. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, unused. Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Template:TS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No longer required, the service was retired long ago. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Utilises a dead toolserver app. Template should be replaced or redesigned to utilise Wikipedia:UCB. Retained in this form should be seem as archaic, and the deprecation should go the next step. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:52, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Toolserver (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The endpoint of the template is now well dead, and the template is now of no active value, and has little to zero value in being retained. It should now either be removed, or just have the notice about being closed down. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
WP:EXISTING -- two links (title and first season [1928]). Not enough to navigate... Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 02:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- delete, can be recreated if more articles are written. Frietjes (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).