Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 November 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 11

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Adding additional search engines and/or namespace restriction/detection could be discussed on the talkpage

Template:Wpsearch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary. Why would we link to Google searches of Wikipedia, and not those of other commercial search engines? I have just removed the only seven instances in article space (on disambiguation pages); the rest of the links to it seem to be largely in the documentation of other search pages. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 27. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 27. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Public art header with long notes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Public art header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Public art header with long notes with Template:Public art header.
These templates need to be merged with |architect=, |dimensions=, |material= and |owner= made optional parameters. Ham (talk) 15:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Public art row with long notes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Public art row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Public art row with long notes with Template:Public art row.
These templates need to be merged with |architect=, |dimensions=, |material= and |owner= made optional parameters. Ham (talk) 15:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, navigational aide is useful, and convention has it that composers have navboxes Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nino Rota (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We don't do navbox like this for performers in the movie industry connecting their work. ...William 14:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete and replace with another quote template Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:14, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sikhi2max (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to generic quote/ citation templates. Used in only one article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TOT F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN - only four genuinely related blue links. Not currently a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 10:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:57, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Cross Straits, Hong Kong & Macau Football Competition for the Youth (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN only two links includsing parent article. Not a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 10:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:53, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rajnavy Rayong F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only four links including the parent club article. Not a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PSAP MVP & Best Goal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No links at all, inherently not an aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Maltese Youth League Section B 2008-09 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Blue links link only to senior teams, not the junior teams and there is no WP article for the league this navbox is meant to aid. Fenix down (talk) 09:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Maltese Youth League Section B 2008-09 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Blue links link only to senior teams, not the junior teams and there is no WP article for the league this navbox is meant to aid. Fenix down (talk) 09:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Maltese Youth League Section A 2009-10 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Blue links link only to senior teams, not the junior teams and there is no WP article for the league this navbox is meant to aid. Fenix down (talk) 09:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Maltese Youth League Section A 2008-09 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Blue links link only to senior teams, not the junior teams and there is no WP article for the league this navbox is meant to aid. Fenix down (talk) 09:56, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aiolikos F.C. seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only three links including the parent article. Not a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:50, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Al-Hilal Seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only two links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:47, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Al.Oruba F.C. seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only three links including the parent club article. Not a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Al.Oruba Football Club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only one link including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Template:Army United F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only four relevant links including the parent club article. Not a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:44, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. No objections to deletion, no quorum

Template:Waikato FC squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only four links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, way out-of-date. If someone wants to recreate it with current information, and keep it up-to-date, go ahead and do so. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Costuleni squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only three links including the parent club article. Not a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:24, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • If it is not being updated, especially as there is not even a full first eleven to list is it really useful? To me it is counter productive in its current state as the squad is materially different compared to the parent article. I think it is better to delete the current template if no one is going to update but with no prejudice towards recreation if someone is prepared to monitor it. Fenix down (talk) 10:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Template:FS Metta/LU squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only two links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FK Liepājas Metalurgs squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only four links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, way out-of-date. If someone wants to recreate it with current information, and keep it up-to-date, go ahead and do so. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Jūrmala squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only three links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • If it is not being updated, especially as there is not even a full first eleven to list is it really useful? To me it is counter productive in its current state as the squad is materially different compared to the parent article. I think it is better to delete the current template if no one is going to update but with no prejudice towards recreation if someone is prepared to monitor it. Fenix down (talk) 10:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ilūkstes NSS squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only two links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, way out-of-date. If someone wants to recreate it with current information, and keep it up-to-date, go ahead and do so. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FB Gulbene squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only four links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:17, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • One of those is the parent article though. Additionally, if it is not being updated, especially as there is not even a full first eleven to list is it really useful? To me it is counter productive in its current state as the squad is materially different compared to the parent article. I think it is better to delete the current template if no one is going to update but with no prejudice towards recreation if someone is prepared to monitor it. Fenix down (talk) 11:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, way out-of-date. If someone wants to recreate it with current information, and keep it up-to-date, go ahead and do so. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FK Jelgava squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only three links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deportes Savio squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only two links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, way out-of-date. If someone wants to recreate it with current information, and keep it up-to-date, go ahead and do so. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Mika squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only four links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

** perhaps update the template?!? Fenix down (talk) 13:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • If it is not being updated, especially as there is not even a full first eleven to list is it really useful? To me it is counter productive in its current state as the squad is materially different compared to the parent article. I think it is better to delete the current template if no one is going to update but with no prejudice towards recreation if someone is prepared to monitor it. Fenix down (talk) 11:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, way out-of-date. If someone wants to recreate it with current information, and keep it up-to-date, go ahead and do so. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Ararat Yerevan squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only three links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:08, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • If it is not being updated, especially as there is not even a full first eleven to list is it really useful? To me it is counter productive in its current state as the squad is materially different compared to the parent article. I think it is better to delete the current template if no one is going to update but with no prejudice towards recreation if someone is prepared to monitor it. Fenix down (talk) 11:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:JK Narva Trans squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, only four links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 08:46, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • One of those links is the parent club though so doesn't really count. There's only really three links to players or staff. Still unclear how this is really useful it just clogs up the article. Fenix down (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Templates for a set of hoax articles. Jac16888 Talk 21:47, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Finn Swift songs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Finn Swift (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finn Swift. This is a cluster of articles that appear to contain very little fact and much fiction. Pichpich (talk) 03:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.