Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 March 13

< March 12	March 14 >

March 13

Template:KDR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KDR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, non-functional Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and this might meet CSD G2 (test page).--eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete, I fixed it, but it's not clear why or if it is needed. Frietjes (talk) 13:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rihanna sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rihanna sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A batch of similar templates were deleted recently (see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 17#Template:Robert De Niro sidebar) and an administrator approved a speedy deletion on Template:Beyoncé sidebar given the TfD discussion for the other sidebars.. but the speedy deletion was declined here. Gloss • talk 22:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 13:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete per precedent. BananaLanguage (talk) 21:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AIAssessment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AIAssessment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was used for Wikipedia:Article Incubator; however, the Article Incubator has been "shut down" and essentially replaced by the "Draft:" namespace. In effect, {{AIAssessment}} no longer serves its intended purpose, or possibly no longer any purpose at all. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My first inclination was to agree to deletion, but I wonder if there is an assessment process for the Draft namespace - if so, then the template could be renamed and adjusted for use there. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 09:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Trying to get components of the AI deleted seems to me to be forum shopping, since the community has already agreed to retain the pages. I personally never used this template, but it was a part of the process for several years, and IMO needs to remain as a reference for use by editors other than admins. Unscintillating (talk) 10:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Unscintillating: if Mark Historical is an option for templates, that could be an option as well. I am aware of the consensus to keep the WP:AI pages, but this template doesn't serve a purpose (in i's current form) unless some changes are made to either itself or its documentation. Steel1943 (talk) 14:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that it doesn't serve a purpose in its current form. It is a reference for use by editors other than admins. A deletion would create a hole that could not be filled by editors who are not admins. Marking it "historical" or "reference only" is fine, but doing so IMO did not and does not require a deletion process and the time of admins to administrate the deletion process. Unscintillating (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, perhaps turning into something useful for Draft space or marking historical per Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_9#Template:Article_Incubator —PC-XT+ 21:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pacific-12 Conference color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:30, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pacific-12 Conference color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{CollegePrimaryStyle}} and {{CollegeSecondaryStyle}}. Frietjes (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tennis team infoboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge the two cup team templates, but no consensus for the college template. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox college tennis team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (12 transclusions)

Template:Infobox Davis Cup team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (84)

Template:Infobox Fed Cup team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (6)

Should be merged as a generic ~~{{Infobox college tennis team}}~~ {{Infobox tennis team}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean as {{Infobox tennis team}}? I'm not a tennis expert but the Davis Cup isn't played by college teams.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; sorry. Fixed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The {{Infobox college tennis team}} is a separate template and should probably stay that way but it seems to me that {{Infobox Davis Cup team}} and {{Infobox Fed Cup team}} could easily be merged after a discussion at WP:TENNIS.--Wolbo (talk) 12:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In what way separate, and why should it remain so? This is the forum for discussing template mergers and deletions; we don't need to to open another (but by all means post a neutral pointer to this one on that project's talk page). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a notice at WT:TENNIS —PC-XT+ 17:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox NRL Season Advanced

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox NRL Season Advanced (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only four transclusions. Apparent fork of {{Infobox NRL Team Season}}; also redundant to {{Infobox rugby league team season }}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Heartland Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 06:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Heartland Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox rugby tournament}} or some other, more generic, template. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Currie Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:30, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Currie Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only five transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox rugby tournament}} or some other, more generic, template. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – now zero transclusions. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 11:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – unused and redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Rugby Union Tri Nations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 April 8 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Jr Rugby World Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 April 8 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Asian Five Nations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 April 8 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.