Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 28

[edit]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Libby Roderick (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

all red links. Frietjes (talk) 23:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KCO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no active directly related links. Frietjes (talk) 22:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge. -FASTILY (TALK) 02:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PUFresolved (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{oldpuffull}} (which is more widely used); if the decision is to delete, there are only 60 transclusions, so it should be a simple matter of using AutoWikiBrowser to relink all transclusions to oldpuffull. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiMapia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

One use; replaceable by {{cite map}}. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 12:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox NI Civil Parish (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As creator of this infobox, i've merged it with Template:Infobox Townlands to decrease redundancy, and as such request that it be deleted as it now serves no purpose. Mabuska (talk) 11:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Programming Block Barnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unlikely to be used, as the "programming block project" only has one member. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Single ship class templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was No consensus. The consensus here seems to be evenly split between "keep (and maybe add succession info to give them a minimum of usefulness)" and "delete after substing". Anomie 20:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bainbridge class cruiser (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Long Beach class cruiser (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Truxtun class cruiser (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Ship templates for classes with only one ship have limited navigation value. The template will never be able to expand. So we have only three links total per template. Brad (talk) 22:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.